CMT vs AZZ vs IIIN Stock Comparison

Core Molding Technologies, Azz and Insteel Industries Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AZZ Azz Inc
$137.17 +0.1% 1M +38.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.09B
P/E
24.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.75B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
6 wins
IIIN Insteel Industries Inc
$28.36 -3.8% 1M -7.4% 1Y
Market cap
$549.23M
P/E
18.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$739.51M
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Azz leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Azz 6, Insteel Industries 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMTAZZIIINLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $191.06M $4.09B $549.23M AZZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.0x 24.4x 18.6x IIIN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 48.6x 18.6x 13.8x IIIN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -7.9% +9.5% +14.2% IIIN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.9% 9.6% — AZZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.2% 11.4% — AZZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.9% +38.9% -7.4% AZZ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.6%/yr +20.9%/yr -6.9%/yr AZZ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.1% 32.1% 41.4% AZZ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 57/100 68/100 IIIN

Percentile Scorecard

CMTAZZIIIN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMTAZZIIIN
Valuation 82 #38 of 203 73 #55 of 203 84 #34 of 203
Growth 7 #175 of 188 62 #72 of 188 32 #129 of 188
Profitability 35 #119 of 183 72 #52 of 183 63 #68 of 183
Financial Health 69 #68 of 217 56 #97 of 217 –
Shareholder Returns 70 #46 of 153 24 #117 of 153 95 #9 of 153
Overall 53 57 68
  • CMT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • AZZ ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • IIIN ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMTAZZIIINSPY
1 month -1.4%+0.1%-3.8% -0.2%
3 months -5.8%-6.3%-13.0% +3.9%
6 months -18.7%-3.1%+12.1% +8.2%
Year to date +13.9%+28.0%-10.5% +12.9%
1 year +25.9%+38.9%-7.4% +12.3%
3 years -11.4%+195.2%+5.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year -3.9%+43.5%+1.7% +23.3%
5 years +97.3%+158.7%-29.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year +14.6%+20.9%-6.9% +10.9%
10 years +29.2%+158.1%+8.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +2.6%+9.9%+0.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCMTAZZIIINSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.1%32.1%41.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 41.6%30.2%51.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.591.180.98 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.621.21-0.18 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.0%-46.8%-49.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.5%-14.4%-25.6% -1.2%
52-week high $28.35$160.17$38.11 $779.14
52-week low $17.56$97.64$24.48 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMTAZZIIIN
P/E now vs peer median 26.7xmedian 25.2x 24.6xmedian 25.2x 18.7xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.9x 2.4xmedian 1.9x 0.7xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.6xmedian 14.0x 12.0xmedian 14.0x —median 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -23.5xmedian 21.7x 19.1xmedian 21.7x -58.5xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 2.3x 2.9xmedian 2.3x 1.4xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.93median 1.32 0.28median 1.32 -6.39median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMTAZZIIIN
Revenue $254.42M $1.75B $739.51M
Gross profit $46.19M $423.83M $75.68M
Operating income $9.22M $287.42M –
Net income $7.35M $167.46M $29.55M
Free cash flow -$8.30M $214.45M –
EPS (diluted) $0.84 $5.56 $1.52
Cash & equivalents $12.13M $1.95M $37.48M
Total debt – $468.47M –
Shares (diluted) 8.71M 30.12M 19.49M
Enterprise value $74.96M $4.08B $549.23M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMTAZZIIIN
P/E 26.7x 24.6x 18.7x
P/FCF -23.5x 19.1x -58.5x
P/Operating cash flow 11.7x 14.0x 15.1x
P/S 0.8x 2.4x 0.7x
P/B 1.2x 2.9x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 4.1x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 8.6x 12.0x –
EV/EBIT 19.9x 15.9x –
EV/Revenue 0.7x 2.6x 0.7x
EV/FCF -22.1x 21.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.0x 15.6x 15.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.93 0.28 -6.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMTAZZIIIN
Revenue growth (1Y) -7.9% 9.5% 14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -12.9% 5.2% 4.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.4% 11.0% -19.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -9.9% 8.9% 5.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -26.4% 21.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -29.0% 11.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) -21.5% -46.7% -28.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -28.3% 99.0% -3.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -22.3% -46.5% -27.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -28.5% 87.1% -2.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -30.0% -42.0% 33.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -21.9% 20.3% -36.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -165.4% -47.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -33.3% 35.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMTAZZIIIN
Gross margin 18.2% 24.3% –
EBITDA margin 8.4% 21.8% –
Operating margin 3.6% 16.5% –
Pretax margin 3.7% 12.9% –
Net margin 2.9% 9.6% –
FCF margin -3.3% 12.3% –
Operating cash flow margin 6.5% 16.7% 4.9%
Return on equity 4.6% 12.0% 7.9%
Return on assets 3.1% 7.3% 6.2%
Return on invested capital 4.2% 11.4% –
Return on capital employed 4.9% 14.1% –
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.8x 1.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 1.7x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.8% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMTAZZIIIN
Debt / assets – 20.0% –
Debt / equity – 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.2x –
Debt / FCF – 2.2x –
Liabilities / assets 29.2% 39.5% –
Equity / assets 70.8% 60.5% 79.0%
Interest coverage 56.6x 6.3x –
Current ratio 2.0x 1.8x 3.7x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.8x –
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score 4.19 4.51 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMTAZZIIIN
Dividend yield – 0.6% 3.9%
Net buyback yield 1.6% – –
Shareholder yield 1.6% 0.6% 3.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMTAZZIIIN
Forward P/E 48.6xFY2026 18.6xFY2026 13.8xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $0.47FY2026 $7.37FY2026 $2.05FY2027
EPS growth, next FY -69.1%FY2026 +19.1%FY2026 +35.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +314.9% +12.1% +7.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $283.16MFY2026 $1.97BFY2026 $759.46MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +3.4%FY2026 +19.4%FY2026 +2.7%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +2.1% -8.1% +4.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMTAZZIIIN
Held by institutions 75.1% 94.6% 82.1%
Institutions holding 92 364 187
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.5% +1.1% +0.9%
Institutions buying 44 196 122
Institutions selling 26 119 48
Buyers to sellers 1.69 1.65 2.54

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMTAZZIIIN
CMT 1.00 0.17 0.17
AZZ 0.17 1.00 0.37
IIIN 0.17 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CMT, AZZ and IIIN?

Azz (AZZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) $191.06M, Azz (AZZ) $4.09B, Insteel Industries (IIIN) $549.23M.

Which stock is cheaper, CMT, AZZ and IIIN?

Insteel Industries (IIIN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 26.0x, Azz (AZZ) 24.4x, Insteel Industries (IIIN) 18.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Insteel Industries (IIIN) is cheapest (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 48.6x, Azz (AZZ) 18.6x, Insteel Industries (IIIN) 13.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Insteel Industries (IIIN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) -7.9%, Azz (AZZ) +9.5%, Insteel Industries (IIIN) +14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Azz (AZZ) has the highest net margin (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 2.9%, Azz (AZZ) 9.6%). On return on invested capital, Azz (AZZ) leads (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 4.2%, Azz (AZZ) 11.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Azz (AZZ) returned the most: Core Molding Technologies (CMT) +25.9%, Azz (AZZ) +38.9%, Insteel Industries (IIIN) -7.4%. Over five years, Azz (AZZ) compounded fastest (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) +14.6%/yr, Azz (AZZ) +20.9%/yr, Insteel Industries (IIIN) -6.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Azz (AZZ) has been the steadiest (Core Molding Technologies (CMT) 42.1%, Azz (AZZ) 32.1%, Insteel Industries (IIIN) 41.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CMT, AZZ and IIIN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Azz (AZZ) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.