CMP vs EAF vs USLM Stock Comparison

Compass Minerals International, Graftech International and United States Lime & Minerals Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ODC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
EAF Graftech International Ltd
$10.68 -3.5% 1M -37.3% 1Y
Market cap
$309.95M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$509.08M
Div. yield
–
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

United States Lime & Minerals leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (United States Lime & Minerals 8, Compass Minerals International 2, Graftech International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMPEAFUSLMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $967.43M $309.95M $3.16B USLM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 52.6x -1.6x 23.5x USLM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.8x — 22.7x USLM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.5% -2.5% +7.0% USLM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.4% -38.4% 35.7% USLM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.2% -12.9% — CMP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.9x -23.1x — EAF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.7% -37.3% -18.4% CMP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.7%/yr -36.9%/yr +35.5%/yr USLM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.2% 112.2% 39.0% USLM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 22/100 73/100 USLM

Percentile Scorecard

CMPEAFUSLM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMPEAFUSLM
Valuation 73 #45 of 162 21 #129 of 162 49 #83 of 162
Growth 64 #53 of 147 7 #137 of 147 57 #64 of 147
Profitability 59 #51 of 122 25 #92 of 122 83 #22 of 122
Financial Health 17 #137 of 165 20 #132 of 165 96 #7 of 165
Shareholder Returns – 40 #65 of 107 81 #21 of 107
Overall 53 22 73
  • CMP ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • EAF ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • USLM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMPEAFUSLMSPY
1 month -1.7%-3.5%-1.6% -0.8%
3 months -25.3%+37.1%-4.2% +3.5%
6 months -16.2%+12.3%-14.7% +7.0%
Year to date +13.2%-31.1%-8.4% +12.2%
1 year +19.7%-37.3%-18.4% +13.0%
3 years -9.0%-68.0%+185.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year -3.1%-31.6%+41.9% +23.1%
5 years -66.6%-90.0%+356.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -19.7%-36.9%+35.5% +11.0%
10 years -69.2%—+718.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year -11.1%—+23.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCMPEAFUSLMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.2%112.2%39.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.4%128.7%44.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.661.961.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.38-0.33-0.47 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.3%-96.1%-45.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.7%-40.7%-21.4% -1.8%
52-week high $33.51$18.01$139.46 $779.14
52-week low $16.54$5.23$97.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMPEAFUSLM
P/E now vs peer median 51.0xmedian 12.8x -1.4xmedian 12.8x 23.4xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 3.1x 0.6xmedian 3.1x 8.3xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 7.0x -29.4xmedian 7.0x 14.9xmedian 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.0xmedian 15.2x -1.8xmedian 15.2x 34.3xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 2.1x -0.7xmedian 2.1x 4.5xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 2.89median 0.29 0.02median 0.29 0.83median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMPEAFUSLM
Revenue $1.29B $509.08M $376.92M
Gross profit $222.50M -$34.13M $182.84M
Operating income $115.50M -$107.10M $158.71M
Net income $18.40M -$195.63M $134.42M
Free cash flow $77.90M -$158.11M $91.81M
R&D – $6.05M –
EPS (diluted) $0.44 $-7.38 $4.67
Cash & equivalents $56.30M $134.31M $402.64M
Total debt $716.60M $1.20B –
Shares (diluted) 42.25M 26.51M 28.78M
Enterprise value $730.63M -$228.39M $1.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMPEAFUSLM
P/E 51.0x -1.4x 23.4x
P/FCF 12.0x -1.8x 34.3x
P/Operating cash flow 6.0x -2.5x 19.3x
P/S 0.7x 0.6x 8.3x
P/B 3.5x -0.7x 4.5x
P/Tangible book 3.6x -0.7x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 7.0x -29.4x 14.9x
EV/EBIT 13.8x -12.6x 17.3x
EV/Revenue 1.2x 2.7x 7.3x
EV/FCF 20.5x -8.6x 29.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.2x -12.0x 16.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.89 0.02 0.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMPEAFUSLM
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.5% -2.5% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.9% -11.4% 12.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 29.5% -1,814% 9.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -1.3% -30.9% 26.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 800.0% -70.6% 9.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.3% -57.0% 29.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 115.2% 4.2% 7.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 18.7% -72.9% 28.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 115.1% 6.3% 7.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.7% -71.1% 28.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -18.8% -29.5% 7.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.6% -43.6% 25.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -33.5% -31.3% -14.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 97.0% -79.2% 21.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMPEAFUSLM
Gross margin 17.2% -6.7% 48.5%
EBITDA margin 17.5% -9.0% 49.0%
Operating margin 8.9% -21.0% 42.1%
Pretax margin 3.2% -36.8% 45.7%
Net margin 1.4% -38.4% 35.7%
FCF margin 6.0% -31.1% 24.4%
Operating cash flow margin 12.1% -22.2% 43.1%
Return on equity 6.8% – 19.8%
Return on assets 1.4% -18.9% 18.4%
Return on invested capital 5.2% -12.9% –
Return on capital employed 10.4% -12.1% 22.3%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 8.5x 0.6x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 1.1% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMPEAFUSLM
Debt / assets 52.9% 117.4% –
Debt / equity 2.7x -3.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.9x -23.1x –
Debt / FCF 9.2x -7.6x –
Liabilities / assets 80.5% 138.0% 6.9%
Equity / assets 19.5% -38.0% 93.1%
Interest coverage 52.5x -1.1x –
Current ratio 2.0x 3.5x 27.5x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.4x 25.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.9x 22.2x
Altman Z-score 1.92 -0.85 39.86

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMPEAFUSLM
Dividend yield – – 0.2%
Net buyback yield – -1.6% 0.1%
Shareholder yield 0.0% -1.6% 0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 5.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 7.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 9.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 14.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMPEAFUSLM
Forward P/E 25.8xFY2026 – 22.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.86FY2026 $-5.68FY2026 $4.84FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +3.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +51.2% – +25.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.21BFY2026 $483.99MFY2026 $426.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.5%FY2026 -4.0%FY2026 +14.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.7% +23.5% +16.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMPEAFUSLM
Held by institutions 91.8% 41.3% 32.5%
Institutions holding 230 90 234
Change in shares held, QoQ -4.3% +2.5% +7.5%
Institutions buying 130 54 139
Institutions selling 56 22 66
Buyers to sellers 2.32 2.45 2.11

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMPEAFUSLM
CMP 1.00 0.24 0.17
EAF 0.24 1.00 0.14
USLM 0.17 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CMP, EAF and USLM?

United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Compass Minerals International (CMP) $967.43M, Graftech International (EAF) $309.95M, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) $3.16B.

Which stock is cheaper, CMP, EAF and USLM?

United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Compass Minerals International (CMP) 52.6x, Graftech International (EAF) -1.6x, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 23.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) is cheapest (Compass Minerals International (CMP) 25.8x, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 22.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Compass Minerals International (CMP) +5.5%, Graftech International (EAF) -2.5%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) has the highest net margin (Compass Minerals International (CMP) 1.4%, Graftech International (EAF) -38.4%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 35.7%). On return on invested capital, Compass Minerals International (CMP) leads (Compass Minerals International (CMP) 5.2%, Graftech International (EAF) -12.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Compass Minerals International (CMP) returned the most: Compass Minerals International (CMP) +19.7%, Graftech International (EAF) -37.3%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) -18.4%. Over five years, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) compounded fastest (Compass Minerals International (CMP) -19.7%/yr, Graftech International (EAF) -36.9%/yr, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) +35.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Compass Minerals International (CMP) 0.00%, Graftech International (EAF) 0.00%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 0.00%. Compass Minerals International (CMP) and Graftech International (EAF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) has been the steadiest (Compass Minerals International (CMP) 51.2%, Graftech International (EAF) 112.2%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 39.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CMP, EAF and USLM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.