CMBT vs GTMAY vs OMAB Stock Comparison

Cmb.Tech, Grupo Tmm Sab and Central North Airport Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CMBT Cmb.Tech Nv
$18.76 -1.0% 1M +99.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.19B
P/E
4.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.89B
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
2 wins
GTMAY Grupo Tmm Sab
$3.28 +19.3% 1M +32,700.0% 1Y
Market cap
$572.53M
P/E
35.4x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Grupo Tmm Sab leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Grupo Tmm Sab 3, Central North Airport 2, Cmb.Tech 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMBTGTMAYOMABLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.19B $572.53M $4.96B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.9x 35.4x 16.7x CMBT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.4x 4.6x 15.5x GTMAY
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +84.9% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.6% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +99.8% +32,700.0% -0.2% GTMAY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.2%/yr +40.5%/yr +16.2%/yr GTMAY
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.1% 779.1% 31.4% OMAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 — 46/100 CMBT

Percentile Scorecard

CMBTGTMAYOMAB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMBTGTMAYOMAB
Valuation 56 #60 of 136 6 #128 of 136 28 #98 of 136
Growth 95 #7 of 121 – –
Profitability 75 #29 of 112 – –
Financial Health 17 #117 of 140 55 #63 of 140 34 #93 of 140
Shareholder Returns 65 #29 of 80 – 76 #20 of 80
Overall 61 – 46
  • CMBT ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • GTMAY ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMBTGTMAYOMABSPY
1 month -1.0%+19.3%+3.7% +0.7%
3 months +17.2%+19.3%-5.2% +3.7%
6 months +36.2%-6.0%-3.3% +7.1%
Year to date +94.4%+143.0%-5.7% +12.8%
1 year +99.8%+32,700.0%-0.2% +11.9%
3 years +5.2%+583.3%+70.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +1.7%+89.8%+19.4% +22.8%
5 years +77.8%+446.7%+111.9% +67.6%
5 years, per year +12.2%+40.5%+16.2% +10.9%
10 years +143.6%+71.7%+118.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year +9.3%+5.6%+8.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCMBTGTMAYOMABSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.1%779.1%31.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.5%1,620.8%28.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.553.411.10 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.4941.97-0.01 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.7%-99.5%-42.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.3%-6.0%-24.0% -1.2%
52-week high $20.92$3.49$134.98 $779.14
52-week low $9.09$0.01$88.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMBTGTMAYOMAB
P/E now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 16.5x 35.4xmedian 16.5x 16.7xmedian 16.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 0.9x 5.8xmedian 0.9x 5.6xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.1xmedian 8.8x —median 8.8x —median 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 11.9x -31.7xmedian 11.9x 12.2xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.2x 4.3xmedian 1.2x 7.8xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.43median 0.84 —median 0.84 —median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMBTGTMAYOMAB
Revenue $2.89B – –
Gross profit $2.22B – –
Operating income $1.21B – –
Net income $839.57M – –
Free cash flow $787.73M – –
EPS (diluted) $3.73 – –
Cash & equivalents $151.57M $27.51M $172.32M
Total debt $5.45B $90.00M $746.90M
Shares (diluted) 229.44M – –
Enterprise value $3.60B $524.31M $4.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMBTGTMAYOMAB
P/E 5.0x 35.4x 16.7x
P/FCF 7.5x -31.7x 12.2x
P/Operating cash flow 7.5x – –
P/S 2.1x 5.8x 5.6x
P/B 1.9x 4.3x 7.8x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 4.5x -10.0x
EV/EBITDA 10.1x – –
EV/EBIT 9.3x – –
EV/Revenue 3.9x – –
EV/FCF 14.2x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 14.2x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.43 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMBTGTMAYOMAB
Revenue growth (1Y) 84.9% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 31.2% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 80.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 30.8% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 146.6% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.4% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 274.8% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.6% – –
EPS growth (1Y) -20.7% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.8% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 184.9% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 184.9% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMBTGTMAYOMAB
Gross margin 76.7% – –
EBITDA margin 38.5% – –
Operating margin 42.0% – –
Pretax margin 28.5% – –
Net margin 29.6% – –
FCF margin 27.3% – –
Operating cash flow margin 27.3% – –
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets – – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMBTGTMAYOMAB
Debt / assets 61.8% 23.0% 43.4%
Debt / equity 1.7x 0.4x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.8x – –
Debt / FCF 6.9x – –
Liabilities / assets 64.6% 47.5% 63.1%
Equity / assets 35.4% 52.5% 36.9%
Interest coverage 2.3x – –
Current ratio 1.1x 1.5x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.0x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.5x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 1.63 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMBTGTMAYOMAB
Dividend yield 4.5% – 5.3%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 4.5% – 5.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMBTGTMAYOMAB
Forward P/E 7.4xFY2026 4.6xFY2023 15.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.54FY2026 $0.72FY2023 $6.60FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +262.9%FY2026 – +3.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -21.7% – +28.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.12BFY2026 $97.26MFY2023 $933.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +27.8%FY2026 – +1.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.9% – +19.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMBTGTMAYOMAB
Held by institutions 20.1% – 12.3%
Institutions holding 170 – 163
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.7% – +5.4%
Institutions buying 78 – 77
Institutions selling 51 – 59
Buyers to sellers 1.53 – 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMBTGTMAYOMAB
CMBT 1.00 0.02 0.08
GTMAY 0.02 1.00 0.04
OMAB 0.08 0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CMBT, GTMAY and OMAB?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cmb.Tech (CMBT) $4.19B, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) $572.53M, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.96B.

Which stock is cheaper, CMBT, GTMAY and OMAB?

Cmb.Tech (CMBT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 4.9x, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 35.4x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) is cheapest (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 7.4x, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 4.6x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 15.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) returned the most: Cmb.Tech (CMBT) +99.8%, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) +32,700.0%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -0.2%. Over five years, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) compounded fastest (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) +12.2%/yr, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) +40.5%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +16.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Central North Airport (OMAB) has been the steadiest (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 40.1%, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 779.1%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CMBT, GTMAY and OMAB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.