CMBT vs DAC vs TNK Stock Comparison

Cmb.Tech, Danaos and Teekay Tankers Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (STNG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CMBT Cmb.Tech Nv
$16.49 -16.2% 1M +81.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.21B
P/E
4.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.89B
Div. yield
5.09%
Marine Shipping Industrials
5 wins
DAC Danaos Corp
$148.76 -10.4% 1M +61.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.72B
P/E
5.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
3.09%
Marine Shipping Industrials
3 wins
TNK Teekay Tankers Ltd.
$81.89 -19.1% 1M +34.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.83B
P/E
4.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.15B
Div. yield
1.22%
Marine Shipping Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Cmb.Tech leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Cmb.Tech 5, Teekay Tankers 3, Danaos 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMBTDACTNKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.21B $2.72B $2.83B CMBT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.4x 5.1x 4.8x CMBT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.5x 5.2x 3.7x TNK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +84.9% +2.5% +15.6% CMBT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.6% 51.3% 51.3% TNK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.8x 0.0x — DAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.09% 3.09% 1.22% CMBT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +81.2% +61.9% +34.2% CMBT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +10.8%/yr +16.0%/yr +42.3%/yr TNK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.4% 23.6% 41.0% DAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 72/100 71/100 DAC

Percentile Scorecard

CMBTDACTNK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMBTDACTNK
Valuation 60 #55 of 137 85 #22 of 137 81 #27 of 137
Growth 93 #10 of 127 46 #69 of 127 68 #41 of 127
Profitability 78 #28 of 125 84 #21 of 125 94 #8 of 125
Financial Health 17 #122 of 147 90 #15 of 147 98 #4 of 147
Shareholder Returns 76 #22 of 90 56 #40 of 90 14 #78 of 90
Overall 65 72 71
  • CMBT ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • DAC ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • TNK ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMBTDACTNKSPY
1 month -16.2%-10.4%-19.1% -5.9%
3 months +0.4%+4.0%+6.2% -4.6%
6 months +11.7%+12.5%+0.8% +0.2%
Year to date +70.9%+58.0%+53.3% +7.5%
1 year +81.2%+61.9%+34.2% +8.2%
3 years -8.1%+126.7%+54.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year -2.8%+31.4%+15.5% +19.0%
5 years +66.7%+110.0%+483.7% +56.5%
5 years, per year +10.8%+16.0%+42.3% +9.4%
10 years +129.0%+308.7%+376.1% +251.5%
10 years, per year +8.6%+15.1%+16.9% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureCMBTDACTNKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.4%23.6%41.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.0%20.9%43.8% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.560.600.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.012.630.84 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.7%-51.7%-53.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.2%-12.5%-24.5% -5.9%
52-week high $20.92$170.09$108.49 $779.14
52-week low $9.10$91.86$51.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMBTDACTNK
P/E now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 14.1x 5.1xmedian 14.1x 4.8xmedian 14.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 0.9x 2.6xmedian 0.9x 2.5xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 7.8x 3.2xmedian 7.8x 2.5xmedian 7.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 11.7x 3.4xmedian 11.7x 8.7xmedian 11.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.2x 0.7xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.38median 0.68 0.94median 0.68 1.46median 0.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMBTDACTNK
Revenue $2.89B $1.06B $1.15B
Gross profit $2.22B $847.70M $866.07M
Operating income $1.21B $510.90M $549.35M
Net income $839.57M $540.80M $592.00M
Free cash flow $787.73M $807.90M $326.32M
EPS (diluted) $3.73 $29.26 $17.02
Cash & equivalents $151.57M $1.01B $735.01M
Total debt $5.45B $1.21B –
Shares (diluted) 229.44M 18.48M 34.78M
Enterprise value $4.62B -$1.40B -$1.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMBTDACTNK
P/E 4.4x 5.1x 4.8x
P/FCF 6.6x 3.4x 8.7x
P/Operating cash flow 6.6x 3.8x 5.2x
P/S 1.8x 2.6x 2.5x
P/B 1.7x 0.7x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 0.7x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 9.5x 3.2x 2.5x
EV/EBIT 8.7x 5.3x 2.9x
EV/Revenue 3.6x 2.6x 1.4x
EV/FCF 13.3x 3.3x 5.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.3x 3.8x 3.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.38 0.94 1.46

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMBTDACTNK
Revenue growth (1Y) 84.9% 2.5% 15.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 31.2% 1.9% -6.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 80.8% 2.6% 34.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 30.8% 0.5% -1.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 146.6% 38.7% 112.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.4% -8.1% -1.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 274.8% 17.7% 109.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 1.8% 3.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -20.7% 23.5% 109.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.8% 5.4% 3.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 184.9% 17.2% 70.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.8% 6.4% -1.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 184.9% -22.0% 8.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 9.8% 4.4% -15.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMBTDACTNK
Gross margin 76.7% 80.3% 75.1%
EBITDA margin 38.4% 80.1% 55.1%
Operating margin 42.0% 48.4% 47.6%
Pretax margin 28.5% 51.3% 51.9%
Net margin 29.6% 51.3% 51.3%
FCF margin 27.3% 76.6% 28.3%
Operating cash flow margin 27.3% 67.8% 46.9%
Return on equity – 13.6% 25.9%
Return on assets – 10.2% 23.8%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – 10.0% 23.4%
Asset turnover – 0.2x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.3x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMBTDACTNK
Debt / assets 61.8% 22.2% –
Debt / equity 1.7x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 4.8x 0.0x –
Debt / FCF 6.9x 1.5x –
Liabilities / assets 64.6% 25.5% 8.3%
Equity / assets 35.4% 74.5% 91.7%
Interest coverage 2.3x 19.6x 208.7x
Current ratio 1.1x 9.3x 10.0x
Quick ratio 0.7x 8.8x 8.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 8.2x 8.2x
Altman Z-score 1.56 2.86 10.18

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMBTDACTNK
Dividend yield 5.1% 3.1% 1.2%
Net buyback yield – 1.1% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 5.1% 4.2% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMBTDACTNK
Forward P/E 6.5xFY2026 5.2xFY2026 3.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.55FY2026 $28.38FY2026 $22.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +264.3%FY2026 +8.0%FY2026 +221.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -21.6% -6.3% -36.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.12BFY2026 $1.11BFY2026 $1.31BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +27.8%FY2026 +7.1%FY2026 +157.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.9% +7.5% -33.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMBTDACTNK
Held by institutions 20.1% 20.8% 57.2%
Institutions holding 170 136 241
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.7% +4.1% -4.7%
Institutions buying 78 72 142
Institutions selling 51 36 70
Buyers to sellers 1.53 2.00 2.03

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMBTDACTNK
CMBT 1.00 0.53 0.67
DAC 0.53 1.00 0.54
TNK 0.67 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CMBT, DAC and TNK?

Cmb.Tech (CMBT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cmb.Tech (CMBT) $5.21B, Danaos (DAC) $2.72B, Teekay Tankers (TNK) $2.83B.

Which stock is cheaper, CMBT, DAC and TNK?

Cmb.Tech (CMBT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 4.4x, Danaos (DAC) 5.1x, Teekay Tankers (TNK) 4.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Teekay Tankers (TNK) is cheapest (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 6.5x, Danaos (DAC) 5.2x, Teekay Tankers (TNK) 3.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cmb.Tech (CMBT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cmb.Tech (CMBT) +84.9%, Danaos (DAC) +2.5%, Teekay Tankers (TNK) +15.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Teekay Tankers (TNK) has the highest net margin (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 29.6%, Danaos (DAC) 51.3%, Teekay Tankers (TNK) 51.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cmb.Tech (CMBT) returned the most: Cmb.Tech (CMBT) +81.2%, Danaos (DAC) +61.9%, Teekay Tankers (TNK) +34.2%. Over five years, Teekay Tankers (TNK) compounded fastest (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) +10.8%/yr, Danaos (DAC) +16.0%/yr, Teekay Tankers (TNK) +42.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Cmb.Tech (CMBT) has the highest dividend yield: Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 5.09%, Danaos (DAC) 3.09%, Teekay Tankers (TNK) 1.22%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Danaos (DAC) has been the steadiest (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 40.4%, Danaos (DAC) 23.6%, Teekay Tankers (TNK) 41.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CMBT, DAC and TNK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cmb.Tech (CMBT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.