CLS vs TTMI vs UCTT Stock Comparison

Celestica, Ttm Technologies and Ultra Clean Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FLEX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CLS Celestica Inc
$282.93 -22.8% 1M -16.2% 1Y
Market cap
$35.68B
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.23B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
7 wins
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$87.63 -28.6% 1M +37.9% 1Y
Market cap
$9.23B
P/E
34.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.83B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Celestica leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Celestica 7, Ttm Technologies 3, Ultra Clean Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLSTTMIUCTTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $35.68B $9.23B $2.50B CLS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.4x 34.5x 93.4x CLS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.5x 16.6x 18.4x TTMI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +61.6% +37.6% +15.8% CLS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.8% 7.0% 1.1% TTMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.0% 10.1% 3.2% CLS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.9x 1.3x 2.0x CLS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.2% +37.9% +91.3% UCTT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +95.9%/yr +46.0%/yr +2.0%/yr CLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.1% 90.3% 90.2% CLS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 61/100 43/100 TTMI

Percentile Scorecard

CLSTTMIUCTT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLSTTMIUCTT
Valuation 65 #40 of 112 66 #39 of 112 61 #37 of 94
Growth 89 #13 of 108 90 #12 of 108 54 #43 of 92
Profitability 78 #24 of 104 62 #40 of 104 33 #59 of 88
Financial Health 57 #51 of 116 28 #84 of 116 10 #87 of 96
Shareholder Returns 18 #64 of 78 – 55 #33 of 72
Overall 61 61 43
  • CLS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • TTMI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • UCTT ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLSTTMIUCTTSPY
1 month -22.8%-28.6%-32.0% +0.7%
3 months -19.8%-24.1%-34.3% +3.7%
6 months -30.9%-44.6%-30.0% +7.1%
Year to date -4.3%+27.0%+115.9% +12.8%
1 year -16.2%+37.9%+91.3% +11.9%
3 years +1,171.6%+657.4%+128.7% +85.2%
3 years, per year +133.5%+96.5%+31.8% +22.8%
5 years +2,781.2%+561.9%+10.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +95.9%+46.0%+2.0% +10.9%
10 years +2,275.6%+547.7%+555.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year +37.3%+20.5%+20.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCLSTTMIUCTTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.1%90.3%90.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 86.4%97.4%94.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.393.823.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.200.421.01 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.0%-66.6%-70.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.1%-60.4%-61.6% -1.2%
52-week high $472.40$221.47$142.59 $779.14
52-week low $246.25$58.45$21.65 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLSTTMIUCTT
P/E now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 32.9x 34.5xmedian 32.9x 93.4xmedian 46.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.9x 2.4xmedian 2.9x 1.0xmedian 7.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.3xmedian 20.0x 17.0xmedian 20.0x 15.4xmedian 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 65.4xmedian 30.2x 624.4xmedian 30.2x -15.2xmedian 40.1x
P/B now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 2.9x 4.5xmedian 2.9x 3.1xmedian 4.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.08 0.15median 1.08 0.37median 2.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLSTTMIUCTT
Revenue $18.23B $3.83B $2.44B
Gross profit $2.09B $850.77M $393.80M
Operating income $1.50B $424.51M $105.50M
Net income $1.25B $268.52M $31.50M
Free cash flow $545.40M $14.79M -$164.00M
R&D $168.90M $32.31M $34.90M
EPS (diluted) $10.23 $2.49 $0.58
Cash & equivalents $3.96B $876.35M $270.90M
Total debt $818.80M $1.64B $635.10M
Shares (diluted) 121.80M 107.70M 46.20M
Enterprise value $30.21B $6.94B $1.42B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLSTTMIUCTT
P/E 27.4x 34.5x 93.4x
P/FCF 65.4x 624.4x -15.2x
P/Operating cash flow 25.4x 27.5x -23.0x
P/S 2.0x 2.4x 1.0x
P/B 5.7x 4.5x 3.1x
P/Tangible book 6.0x 5.1x 3.7x
EV/EBITDA 19.3x 17.0x 15.4x
EV/EBIT 21.6x 23.6x 27.1x
EV/Revenue 1.8x 2.6x 1.2x
EV/FCF 59.7x 676.3x -17.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 23.1x 29.8x -26.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.15 0.37

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLSTTMIUCTT
Revenue growth (1Y) 61.6% 37.6% 15.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 17.9% 9.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 53.8% 51.3% 16.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 25.9% 7.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 62.0% 120.0% 214.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 94.7% 12.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 73.8% 103.5% 119.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 230.0% 205.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 65.4% 100.0% 116.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 225.7% 250.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 154.8% 6.6% -245.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -55.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 37.0% -58.7% -1,059%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -77.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLSTTMIUCTT
Gross margin 11.5% 22.2% 16.1%
EBITDA margin 9.3% 15.3% 7.6%
Operating margin 8.3% 11.1% 4.3%
Pretax margin 8.0% 9.0% 3.6%
Net margin 6.8% 7.0% 1.1%
FCF margin 3.0% 0.4% -6.7%
Operating cash flow margin 7.7% 8.8% -4.4%
Return on equity 28.7% 13.5% 4.8%
Return on assets 10.0% 5.4% 1.8%
Return on invested capital 25.0% 10.1% 3.2%
Return on capital employed 32.1% 13.2% 6.9%
Asset turnover 1.5x 0.8x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.3x -3.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 1.9% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLSTTMIUCTT
Debt / assets 5.4% 29.6% 30.2%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.8x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.9x 1.3x 2.0x
Debt / FCF 1.5x 111.2x -3.9x
Liabilities / assets 59.0% 63.3% 61.4%
Equity / assets 41.0% 36.7% 38.6%
Interest coverage 21.3x 9.2x 5.8x
Current ratio 1.6x 1.7x 2.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.4x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.5x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – 3.08 3.12

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLSTTMIUCTT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -9.3% – 0.2%
Shareholder yield -9.3% – 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLSTTMIUCTT
Forward P/E 24.5xFY2026 16.6xFY2026 18.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.54FY2026 $5.29FY2026 $2.98FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +93.3%FY2026 +115.0%FY2026 +183.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +77.4% +53.3% +102.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $20.07BFY2026 $4.26BFY2026 $2.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +64.1%FY2026 +46.4%FY2026 +29.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +70.3% +60.2% +38.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLSTTMIUCTT
Held by institutions 69.0% 92.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 875 639 434
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.0% +0.6% +2.5%
Institutions buying 519 396 238
Institutions selling 273 203 162
Buyers to sellers 1.90 1.95 1.47

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLSTTMIUCTT
CLS 1.00 0.60 0.49
TTMI 0.60 1.00 0.66
UCTT 0.49 0.66 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLS, TTMI and UCTT?

Celestica (CLS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Celestica (CLS) $35.68B, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $9.23B, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) $2.50B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLS, TTMI and UCTT?

Celestica (CLS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Celestica (CLS) 27.4x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 34.5x, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 93.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) is cheapest (Celestica (CLS) 24.5x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 16.6x, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 18.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Celestica (CLS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Celestica (CLS) +61.6%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +37.6%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) +15.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ttm Technologies (TTMI) has the highest net margin (Celestica (CLS) 6.8%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 1.1%). On return on invested capital, Celestica (CLS) leads (Celestica (CLS) 25.0%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.1%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 3.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) returned the most: Celestica (CLS) -16.2%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +37.9%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) +91.3%. Over five years, Celestica (CLS) compounded fastest (Celestica (CLS) +95.9%/yr, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +46.0%/yr, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) +2.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Celestica (CLS) has been the steadiest (Celestica (CLS) 80.1%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.3%, Ultra Clean Holdings (UCTT) 90.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLS, TTMI and UCTT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Celestica (CLS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.