CLS vs PLXS vs FN Stock Comparison

Celestica, Plexus and Fabrinet Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CLS Celestica Inc
$259.98 -32.9% 1M -25.5% 1Y
Market cap
$28.30B
P/E
22.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.23B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
7 wins
PLXS Plexus Corp
$216.78 -20.6% 1M +51.0% 1Y
Market cap
$5.49B
P/E
29.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.60B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins
FN Fabrinet
$363.37 -21.6% 1M -18.0% 1Y
Market cap
$12.14B
P/E
25.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.64B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Celestica leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Celestica 7, Plexus 3, Fabrinet 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLSPLXSFNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $28.30B $5.49B $12.14B CLS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.7x 29.6x 25.7x CLS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.5x 20.5x 21.4x PLXS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +61.6% +14.2% +35.7% CLS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.8% 4.0% 10.2% FN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.0% 11.3% — CLS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.9x -0.1x — CLS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -25.5% +51.0% -18.0% PLXS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +89.8%/yr +18.6%/yr +25.5%/yr CLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 80.6% 43.0% 79.7% PLXS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 52/100 56/100 CLS

Percentile Scorecard

CLSPLXSFN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLSPLXSFN
Valuation 67 #38 of 112 52 #54 of 112 40 #68 of 112
Growth 90 #12 of 108 41 #64 of 108 58 #46 of 108
Profitability 77 #25 of 104 54 #48 of 104 70 #32 of 104
Financial Health 57 #51 of 116 40 #70 of 116 59 #48 of 116
Shareholder Returns 19 #69 of 85 74 #23 of 85 52 #41 of 85
Overall 62 52 56
  • CLS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • PLXS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLSPLXSFNSPY
1 month -32.9%-20.6%-21.6% -2.0%
3 months -30.0%-21.7%-31.6% -2.2%
6 months -37.8%-18.2%-45.0% +4.2%
Year to date -12.1%+47.5%-20.2% +10.6%
1 year -25.5%+51.0%-18.0% +10.4%
3 years +913.2%+118.8%+123.6% +73.6%
3 years, per year +116.5%+29.9%+30.8% +20.2%
5 years +2,357.3%+134.1%+210.9% +61.6%
5 years, per year +89.8%+18.6%+25.5% +10.1%
10 years +2,088.4%+374.6%+844.1% +261.3%
10 years, per year +36.2%+16.9%+25.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCLSPLXSFNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 80.6%43.0%79.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 86.6%46.8%83.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.451.803.21 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.321.19-0.23 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.0%-34.9%-57.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -45.0%-28.6%-51.3% -3.2%
52-week high $472.40$303.82$746.47 $779.14
52-week low $246.25$132.74$314.32 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLSPLXSFN
P/E now vs peer median 25.1xmedian 30.7x 31.2xmedian 30.7x 27.5xmedian 30.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.6x 1.3xmedian 2.6x 2.8xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.5xmedian 18.9x 18.7xmedian 18.9x 22.9xmedian 18.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 60.1xmedian 28.0x 93.5xmedian 28.0x 3,084xmedian 28.0x
P/B now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 2.8x 3.8xmedian 2.8x 5.3xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.07 3.72median 1.07 1.11median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLSPLXSFN
Revenue $18.23B $4.60B $4.64B
Gross profit $2.09B $461.48M $556.51M
Operating income $1.50B $230.67M $462.89M
Net income $1.25B $185.41M $473.03M
Free cash flow $545.40M $61.87M $4.22M
R&D $168.90M – –
EPS (diluted) $10.23 $6.79 $13.05
Cash & equivalents $3.96B $314.05M $346.71M
Total debt $818.80M $275.46M –
Shares (diluted) 121.80M 27.29M 36.25M
Enterprise value $22.82B $4.31B $8.39B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLSPLXSFN
P/E 25.1x 31.2x 27.5x
P/FCF 60.1x 93.5x 3,084x
P/Operating cash flow 23.3x 33.8x 50.7x
P/S 1.8x 1.3x 2.8x
P/B 5.3x 3.8x 5.3x
P/Tangible book 5.5x 3.8x 5.3x
EV/EBITDA 17.5x 18.7x 22.9x
EV/EBIT 19.7x 24.9x 26.2x
EV/Revenue 1.6x 1.2x 2.6x
EV/FCF 54.4x 92.8x 2,877x
EV/Operating cash flow 21.1x 33.6x 47.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 3.72 1.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLSPLXSFN
Revenue growth (1Y) 61.6% 14.2% 35.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.2% 20.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 53.8% 12.7% 34.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 4.5% 18.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 62.0% 13.6% 42.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 4.0% 22.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 73.8% 14.0% 42.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 7.5% 24.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 65.4% 15.0% 42.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 8.4% 24.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 154.8% -49.3% -21.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 31.3% 6.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 37.0% -75.3% -98.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 70.7% -69.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLSPLXSFN
Gross margin 11.5% 10.0% 12.0%
EBITDA margin 9.3% 6.7% 11.4%
Operating margin 8.3% 5.0% 10.0%
Pretax margin 8.0% 4.7% 12.0%
Net margin 6.8% 4.0% 10.2%
FCF margin 3.0% 1.3% 0.1%
Operating cash flow margin 7.7% 3.7% 5.5%
Return on equity 28.7% 12.3% 19.9%
Return on assets 10.0% 5.3% 12.8%
Return on invested capital 25.0% 11.3% –
Return on capital employed 32.1% 14.9% 20.1%
Asset turnover 1.5x 1.3x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 0.9x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 1.0% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLSPLXSFN
Debt / assets 5.4% 7.6% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.9x -0.1x –
Debt / FCF 1.5x 4.5x –
Liabilities / assets 59.0% 57.9% 37.2%
Equity / assets 41.0% 42.1% 62.8%
Interest coverage 21.3x 18.0x –
Current ratio 1.6x 1.5x 2.3x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.7x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.2x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – 4.26 8.40

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLSPLXSFN
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -10.2% 1.5% 0.0%
Shareholder yield -10.2% 1.5% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLSPLXSFN
Forward P/E 22.5xFY2026 20.5xFY2027 21.4xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $11.54FY2026 $10.58FY2027 $16.97FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +93.3%FY2026 +39.6%FY2027 +20.4%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +77.4% +1.3% +21.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $20.07BFY2026 $5.37BFY2027 $5.84BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +64.1%FY2026 +8.1%FY2027 +25.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +70.3% +20.8% +27.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLSPLXSFN
Held by institutions 69.0% 99.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 876 449 757
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.0% -0.6% -6.6%
Institutions buying 520 246 432
Institutions selling 273 135 246
Buyers to sellers 1.90 1.82 1.76

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLSPLXSFN
CLS 1.00 0.54 0.66
PLXS 0.54 1.00 0.66
FN 0.66 0.66 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLS, PLXS and FN?

Celestica (CLS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Celestica (CLS) $28.30B, Plexus (PLXS) $5.49B, Fabrinet (FN) $12.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLS, PLXS and FN?

Celestica (CLS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Celestica (CLS) 22.7x, Plexus (PLXS) 29.6x, Fabrinet (FN) 25.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Plexus (PLXS) is cheapest (Celestica (CLS) 22.5x, Plexus (PLXS) 20.5x, Fabrinet (FN) 21.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Celestica (CLS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Celestica (CLS) +61.6%, Plexus (PLXS) +14.2%, Fabrinet (FN) +35.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fabrinet (FN) has the highest net margin (Celestica (CLS) 6.8%, Plexus (PLXS) 4.0%, Fabrinet (FN) 10.2%). On return on invested capital, Celestica (CLS) leads (Celestica (CLS) 25.0%, Plexus (PLXS) 11.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Plexus (PLXS) returned the most: Celestica (CLS) -25.5%, Plexus (PLXS) +51.0%, Fabrinet (FN) -18.0%. Over five years, Celestica (CLS) compounded fastest (Celestica (CLS) +89.8%/yr, Plexus (PLXS) +18.6%/yr, Fabrinet (FN) +25.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Plexus (PLXS) has been the steadiest (Celestica (CLS) 80.6%, Plexus (PLXS) 43.0%, Fabrinet (FN) 79.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLS, PLXS and FN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Celestica (CLS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.