CLOQ vs AVGO vs RDVT Stock Comparison

Cyberloq Technologies, Broadcom and Red Violet Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
AVGO Broadcom Inc.
$345.00 -2.8% 1M -10.6% 1Y
Market cap
$1.54T
P/E
40.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$89.10B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
7 wins
RDVT Red Violet, Inc.
$80.46 +1.4% 1M +55.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.13B
P/E
69.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$99.02M
Div. yield
–
Identity and Access Management Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Broadcom leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Broadcom 7, Red Violet 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLOQAVGORDVTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.20M $1.54T $1.13B AVGO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -21.1x 40.3x 69.1x AVGO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 31.3x 54.4x AVGO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +48.7% +20.2% AVGO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 42.9% 16.5% AVGO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 26.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.7x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -31.8% -10.6% +55.2% RDVT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.4%/yr +45.4%/yr +20.4%/yr AVGO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 195.0% 46.3% 48.6% AVGO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 25/100 64/100 82/100 RDVT

Percentile Scorecard

CLOQAVGORDVT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLOQAVGORDVT
Valuation 38 #77 of 124 43 #54 of 94 61 #49 of 124
Growth 27 #83 of 113 90 #10 of 92 96 #6 of 113
Profitability – 93 #7 of 88 98 #3 of 109
Financial Health 10 #115 of 127 35 #63 of 96 98 #4 of 127
Shareholder Returns 24 #48 of 63 59 #30 of 72 58 #27 of 63
Overall 25 64 82
  • CLOQ ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • AVGO ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • RDVT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLOQAVGORDVTSPY
1 month 0.0%-2.8%+1.4% +0.7%
3 months -16.7%-11.0%+17.7% +3.7%
6 months 0.0%-17.4%+115.0% +7.1%
Year to date -28.6%-0.3%+41.3% +12.8%
1 year -31.8%-10.6%+55.2% +11.9%
3 years +50.0%+310.1%+298.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +14.5%+60.1%+58.6% +22.8%
5 years +7.1%+548.9%+152.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year +1.4%+45.4%+20.4% +10.9%
10 years +50.0%+1,937.8%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +4.1%+35.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCLOQAVGORDVTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 195.0%46.3%48.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 302.3%48.5%49.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.992.180.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.16-0.231.14 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.9%-41.5%-63.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -31.8%-28.4%-2.4% -1.2%
52-week high $0.22$481.57$82.40 $779.14
52-week low $0.07$293.41$34.40 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLOQAVGORDVT
P/E now vs peer median -21.1xmedian 39.0x 43.0xmedian 46.4x 69.6xmedian 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.6x 18.5xmedian 7.8x 11.5xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 32.7x 32.4xmedian 27.5x 37.7xmedian 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -32.1xmedian 27.4x 41.8xmedian 40.1x 33.8xmedian 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median -10.5xmedian 3.2x 16.5xmedian 4.7x 10.2xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.90median 1.23 1.26median 2.10 0.89median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLOQAVGORDVT
Revenue – $89.10B $99.02M
Gross profit – $61.28B $83.87M
Operating income -$641.64K $42.81B $17.72M
Net income -$1.00M $38.27B $16.38M
Free cash flow -$660.70K $39.40B $33.60M
R&D $215.52K $11.84B –
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $7.83 $1.13
Cash & equivalents $49.98K $23.98B $49.97M
Total debt $6.89M $59.42B –
Shares (diluted) 141.33M 4.89B 14.46M
Enterprise value $20.77M $1.47T $950.06M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLOQAVGORDVT
P/E -21.1x 43.0x 69.6x
P/FCF -32.1x 41.8x 33.8x
P/Operating cash flow -32.1x 40.5x 33.3x
P/S – 18.5x 11.5x
P/B -10.5x 16.5x 10.2x
P/Tangible book -4.7x 22.4x 16.1x
EV/EBITDA – 32.4x 37.7x
EV/EBIT -33.8x 39.3x 61.3x
EV/Revenue – 18.9x 11.0x
EV/FCF -32.9x 42.7x 32.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -32.9x 41.4x 31.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.90 1.26 0.89

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLOQAVGORDVT
Revenue growth (1Y) – 48.7% 20.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 36.0% 19.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 53.0% 22.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 36.3% 23.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.2% 89.4% 80.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -16.4% 39.0% 111.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.6% 102.1% 88.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -13.1% 40.1% 79.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 15.6% 101.0% 89.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -7.3% 34.1% 78.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16.9% 59.8% 29.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -14.2% 31.6% 39.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16.9% 58.1% 28.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -14.2% 31.4% 39.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLOQAVGORDVT
Gross margin – 68.8% 84.7%
EBITDA margin – 58.2% 29.1%
Operating margin – 48.0% 17.9%
Pretax margin – 45.4% 19.4%
Net margin – 42.9% 16.5%
FCF margin – 44.2% 33.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 45.6% 34.4%
Return on equity – 40.8% 15.2%
Return on assets -29.8% 20.8% 14.1%
Return on invested capital – 26.0% –
Return on capital employed – 26.3% 16.0%
Asset turnover – 0.5x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.1x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 9.5% 7.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLOQAVGORDVT
Debt / assets 21.7% 31.6% –
Debt / equity -0.3x 0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.7x –
Debt / FCF -0.9x 1.5x –
Liabilities / assets 177.5% 47.0% 7.3%
Equity / assets -77.5% 53.0% 92.7%
Interest coverage -3.2x 13.7x –
Current ratio 0.0x 2.5x 10.9x
Quick ratio 0.0x 2.2x 10.5x
Cash ratio 0.0x 1.2x 8.3x
Altman Z-score – 12.76 80.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLOQAVGORDVT
Dividend yield – 0.8% –
Net buyback yield -1.5% 0.5% 0.4%
Shareholder yield -1.5% 1.3% 0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLOQAVGORDVT
Forward P/E – 31.3xFY2026 54.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $11.01FY2026 $1.48FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +61.4%FY2026 +13.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +68.8% +15.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $102.00BFY2026 $114.03MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +59.7%FY2026 +26.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +61.2% +1.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLOQAVGORDVT
Held by institutions – 78.1% 69.5%
Institutions holding – 4,800 173
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.7% +0.5%
Institutions buying – 2,638 104
Institutions selling – 1,843 51
Buyers to sellers – 1.43 2.04

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLOQAVGORDVT
CLOQ 1.00 0.06 -0.01
AVGO 0.06 1.00 0.09
RDVT -0.01 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLOQ, AVGO and RDVT?

Broadcom (AVGO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cyberloq Technologies (CLOQ) $21.20M, Broadcom (AVGO) $1.54T, Red Violet (RDVT) $1.13B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLOQ, AVGO and RDVT?

Broadcom (AVGO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cyberloq Technologies (CLOQ) -21.1x, Broadcom (AVGO) 40.3x, Red Violet (RDVT) 69.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Broadcom (AVGO) is cheapest (Broadcom (AVGO) 31.3x, Red Violet (RDVT) 54.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Broadcom (AVGO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Broadcom (AVGO) +48.7%, Red Violet (RDVT) +20.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Broadcom (AVGO) has the highest net margin (Broadcom (AVGO) 42.9%, Red Violet (RDVT) 16.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Red Violet (RDVT) returned the most: Cyberloq Technologies (CLOQ) -31.8%, Broadcom (AVGO) -10.6%, Red Violet (RDVT) +55.2%. Over five years, Broadcom (AVGO) compounded fastest (Cyberloq Technologies (CLOQ) +1.4%/yr, Broadcom (AVGO) +45.4%/yr, Red Violet (RDVT) +20.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Broadcom (AVGO) has been the steadiest (Cyberloq Technologies (CLOQ) 195.0%, Broadcom (AVGO) 46.3%, Red Violet (RDVT) 48.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLOQ, AVGO and RDVT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Broadcom (AVGO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.