CLMB vs ARW vs INGM Stock Comparison

Climb Global Solutions, Arrow Electronics and Ingram Micro Holding Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CDW) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ARW Arrow Electronics, Inc.
$220.63 -4.1% 1M +90.0% 1Y
Market cap
$10.66B
P/E
13.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$35.92B
Div. yield
–
Technology Distribution Technology
7 wins
INGM Ingram Micro Holding Corp
$28.59 +6.1% 1M +30.1% 1Y
Market cap
$6.48B
P/E
14.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$58.59B
Div. yield
0.01%
Technology Distribution Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Arrow Electronics leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Arrow Electronics 7, Climb Global Solutions 3, Ingram Micro Holding 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLMBARWINGMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $747.58M $10.66B $6.48B ARW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 31.4x 13.1x 14.0x ARW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.2x 9.6x 8.8x INGM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.2% +26.1% +14.8% ARW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.1% 2.3% 0.8% CLMB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.5% 10.2% 8.5% CLMB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.4x 2.3x ARW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +25.4% +90.0% +30.1% ARW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +44.5%/yr +13.8%/yr — CLMB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.3% 37.5% 44.0% ARW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 52/100 52/100 ARW

Percentile Scorecard

CLMBARWINGM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLMBARWINGM
Valuation 27 #37 of 50 76 #13 of 50 69 #16 of 50
Growth 71 #14 of 45 80 #10 of 45 93 #4 of 45
Profitability 59 #17 of 40 41 #24 of 40 33 #27 of 40
Financial Health 34 #40 of 60 32 #41 of 60 22 #47 of 60
Shareholder Returns 11 #25 of 28 33 #19 of 28 41 #17 of 28
Overall 40 52 52
  • CLMB ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services
  • ARW ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services
  • INGM ranked among 65 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLMBARWINGMSPY
1 month +27.8%-4.1%+6.1% +0.7%
3 months +56.5%+3.7%-5.8% +3.7%
6 months +150.8%+17.5%-7.1% +7.1%
Year to date +62.8%+100.2%+34.0% +12.8%
1 year +25.4%+90.0%+30.1% +11.9%
3 years +281.1%+96.1%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +56.2%+25.2%— +22.8%
5 years +529.2%+90.6%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +44.5%+13.8%— +10.9%
10 years +870.8%+262.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +25.5%+13.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCLMBARWINGMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.3%37.5%44.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.7%34.8%47.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.511.481.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.452.400.68 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.5%-38.2%-40.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-8.9%-9.6% -1.2%
52-week high $41.84$242.14$31.64 $779.14
52-week low $16.68$101.87$19.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLMBARWINGM
P/E now vs peer median 32.2xmedian 17.5x 13.9xmedian 17.5x 14.3xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 0.7x 0.3xmedian 0.7x 0.1xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.3xmedian 10.4x 9.7xmedian 10.4x 7.6xmedian 10.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.9xmedian 13.3x 13.6xmedian 13.3x 43.5xmedian 13.3x
P/B now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 1.5x 1.6xmedian 1.5x 1.5xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 1.31median 1.28 -1.50median 1.28 —median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLMBARWINGM
Revenue $770.74M $35.92B $58.59B
Gross profit $119.50M $4.06B $3.85B
Operating income $30.74M $1.21B $1.06B
Net income $23.78M $811.67M $462.23M
Free cash flow $30.10M $825.46M $154.57M
EPS (diluted) $1.30 $15.65 $1.99
Cash & equivalents $66.95M $244.63M $1.00B
Total debt – $10.85B $3.90B
Shares (diluted) 18.32M 51.87M 231.77M
Enterprise value $545.73M $9.61B $1.89B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLMBARWINGM
P/E 32.2x 13.9x 14.3x
P/FCF 25.9x 13.6x 43.5x
P/Operating cash flow 24.2x 12.0x 22.4x
P/S 1.0x 0.3x 0.1x
P/B 5.8x 1.6x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 7.7x 1.6x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA 18.3x 9.7x 7.6x
EV/EBIT 23.2x 10.9x 9.1x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 0.4x 0.2x
EV/FCF 23.7x 15.9x 62.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.2x 14.1x 32.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.31 -1.50 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLMBARWINGM
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.2% 26.1% 14.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 32.1% 0.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.0% 26.4% 10.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 26.3% -3.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -2.1% 68.5% 30.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 26.5% -13.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 11.4% 73.6% 59.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.2% -12.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 10.3% 75.3% 62.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 24.6% -9.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -27.6% 69.4% 189.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.8% 39.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -26.4% 76.3% 133.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.2% 45.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLMBARWINGM
Gross margin 15.5% 11.3% 6.6%
EBITDA margin 5.0% 3.8% 2.2%
Operating margin 4.0% 3.4% 1.8%
Pretax margin 4.2% 2.9% 1.2%
Net margin 3.1% 2.3% 0.8%
FCF margin 3.9% 2.3% 0.3%
Operating cash flow margin 4.2% 2.6% 0.5%
Return on equity 18.4% 11.7% 10.7%
Return on assets 4.8% 2.2% 2.1%
Return on invested capital 17.5% 10.2% 8.5%
Return on capital employed 26.7% 14.4% 15.2%
Asset turnover 1.6x 1.0x 2.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.2x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.1% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLMBARWINGM
Debt / assets – 5.7% 16.9%
Debt / equity – 0.3x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.4x 2.3x
Debt / FCF – 2.6x 25.2x
Liabilities / assets 74.1% 81.6% 81.0%
Equity / assets 25.9% 18.4% 19.0%
Interest coverage – – 3.6x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.2x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.0x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3.30 1.71 3.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLMBARWINGM
Dividend yield 0.1% – 1.2%
Net buyback yield 0.3% 1.0% 1.8%
Shareholder yield 0.4% 1.0% 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 17.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 52.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 36.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLMBARWINGM
Forward P/E 31.2xFY2026 9.6xFY2026 8.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.34FY2026 $23.06FY2026 $3.25FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.5%FY2026 +109.3%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +39.6% +9.8% +10.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $714.50MFY2026 $41.84BFY2026 $55.78BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.5%FY2026 +35.6%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.9% -3.8% +3.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLMBARWINGM
Held by institutions 80.1% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 135 633 228
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.3% -2.6% +1.0%
Institutions buying 75 359 165
Institutions selling 45 196 44
Buyers to sellers 1.67 1.83 3.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLMBARWINGM
CLMB 1.00 0.09 0.14
ARW 0.09 1.00 0.38
INGM 0.14 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLMB, ARW and INGM?

Arrow Electronics (ARW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) $747.58M, Arrow Electronics (ARW) $10.66B, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) $6.48B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLMB, ARW and INGM?

Arrow Electronics (ARW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 31.4x, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 13.1x, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 14.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) is cheapest (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 31.2x, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 9.6x, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Arrow Electronics (ARW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) +24.2%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) +26.1%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +14.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has the highest net margin (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 3.1%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 2.3%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.8%). On return on invested capital, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) leads (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 17.5%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 10.2%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Arrow Electronics (ARW) returned the most: Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) +25.4%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) +90.0%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +30.1%. Over five years, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) compounded fastest (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) +44.5%/yr, Arrow Electronics (ARW) +13.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 0.00%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 0.00%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.01%. Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) and Arrow Electronics (ARW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Arrow Electronics (ARW) has been the steadiest (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 56.3%, Arrow Electronics (ARW) 37.5%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 44.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLMB, ARW and INGM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Arrow Electronics (ARW) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.