CLH vs OSK vs WCN Stock Comparison

Clean Harbors, Oshkosh and Waste Connections Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ECVT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CLH Clean Harbors Inc
$296.10 -7.1% 1M +40.7% 1Y
Market cap
$15.10B
P/E
28.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.56B
Div. yield
–
Hazardous Waste Industrials
6 wins
OSK Oshkosh Corp
$145.51 +8.7% 1M +18.0% 1Y
Market cap
$8.91B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.76B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
3 wins
WCN Waste Connections, Inc.
$188.09 +22.3% 1M +12.2% 1Y
Market cap
$48.09B
P/E
45.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.76B
Div. yield
0.01%
Solid Waste Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Clean Harbors leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Clean Harbors 6, Oshkosh 3, Waste Connections 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLHOSKWCNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.10B $8.91B $48.09B WCN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.6x 17.9x 45.3x OSK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.7x 14.3x 34.6x OSK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.1% +4.2% +5.7% CLH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.0% 4.6% 10.9% WCN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% 10.2% 7.4% CLH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.6x 2.9x OSK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +40.7% +18.0% +12.2% CLH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.5%/yr +5.4%/yr +6.9%/yr CLH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.0% 39.7% 25.6% CLH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 66/100 54/100 CLH

Percentile Scorecard

CLHOSKWCN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLHOSKWCN
Valuation 67 #6 of 16 89 #24 of 203 27 #12 of 16
Growth 77 #4 of 14 39 #115 of 189 62 #6 of 14
Profitability 85 #3 of 14 59 #77 of 187 77 #4 of 14
Financial Health 73 #5 of 16 51 #109 of 221 20 #13 of 16
Shareholder Returns 43 #5 of 8 91 #15 of 152 86 #2 of 8
Overall 69 66 54
  • CLH ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • OSK ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • WCN ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLHOSKWCNSPY
1 month -7.1%+8.7%+22.3% -2.3%
3 months -4.8%-2.0%+12.2% -0.7%
6 months -4.6%-2.9%+17.1% +4.8%
Year to date +26.3%+15.8%+7.3% +10.3%
1 year +40.7%+18.0%+12.2% +10.3%
3 years +91.5%+54.0%+41.2% +73.0%
3 years, per year +24.2%+15.5%+12.2% +20.1%
5 years +176.1%+30.2%+39.7% +61.9%
5 years, per year +22.5%+5.4%+6.9% +10.1%
10 years +576.8%+164.4%+278.8% +258.6%
10 years, per year +21.1%+10.2%+14.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCLHOSKWCNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.0%39.7%25.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.1%38.5%23.1% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.291.34-0.20 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.620.450.48 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -30.9%-43.5%-25.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.5%-18.2%0.0% -3.5%
52-week high $327.10$177.94$188.09 $779.14
52-week low $201.73$118.59$149.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLHOSKWCN
P/E now vs peer median 29.6xmedian 30.9x 18.1xmedian 25.6x 45.0xmedian 30.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 3.4x 0.8xmedian 1.9x 4.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.5xmedian 15.1x 9.7xmedian 14.4x 18.0xmedian 15.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.2xmedian 18.0x 9.5xmedian 22.5x 38.5xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 2.9x 2.0xmedian 2.2x 6.0xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 2.04median 2.73 48.64median 1.36 5.13median 2.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLHOSKWCN
Revenue $6.56B $10.76B $9.76B
Gross profit $2.17B $1.66B $4.15B
Operating income $864.39M $734.30M $1.66B
Net income $528.36M $498.50M $1.06B
Free cash flow $500.54M $942.10M $1.23B
EPS (diluted) $9.99 $8.01 $4.18
Cash & equivalents $423.54M $558.00M $98.18M
Total debt $2.89B $1.10B $9.32B
Shares (diluted) 52.90M 62.24M 253.86M
Enterprise value $12.44B $7.22B $47.72B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLHOSKWCN
P/E 29.6x 18.1x 45.0x
P/FCF 31.2x 9.5x 38.5x
P/Operating cash flow 15.3x 7.9x 18.9x
P/S 2.4x 0.8x 4.9x
P/B 5.0x 2.0x 6.0x
P/Tangible book 6.9x 2.3x 8.0x
EV/EBITDA 13.5x 9.7x 18.0x
EV/EBIT 20.8x 12.9x 34.1x
EV/Revenue 2.7x 0.9x 5.8x
EV/FCF 35.9x 10.0x 46.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.6x 8.3x 22.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.04 48.64 5.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLHOSKWCN
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.1% 4.2% 5.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.1% 4.6% 8.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.2% -10.1% 7.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.0% 2.4% 10.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 32.6% -22.8% 47.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.4% -1.5% 8.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 36.0% -25.2% 64.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 13.4% -1.5% 8.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 38.1% -22.4% 68.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.5% 0.4% 8.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.0% 16.3% 8.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.1% 36.2% 6.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 11.2% 26.0% 8.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.1% 69.7% 2.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLHOSKWCN
Gross margin 33.1% 15.4% 42.5%
EBITDA margin 20.3% 9.1% 32.2%
Operating margin 13.2% 6.8% 17.0%
Pretax margin 10.9% 5.9% 14.2%
Net margin 8.0% 4.6% 10.9%
FCF margin 7.6% 8.8% 12.6%
Operating cash flow margin 15.5% 10.5% 25.7%
Return on equity 17.5% 11.0% 13.3%
Return on assets 6.6% 4.9% 5.0%
Return on invested capital 10.9% 10.2% 7.4%
Return on capital employed 12.8% 10.5% 8.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.1x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 2.3x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.4% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLHOSKWCN
Debt / assets 34.9% 10.7% 43.6%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.2x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 0.6x 2.9x
Debt / FCF 5.8x 1.2x 7.6x
Liabilities / assets 62.4% 55.6% 63.0%
Equity / assets 37.6% 44.4% 37.0%
Interest coverage – 6.1x 4.8x
Current ratio 1.9x 1.7x 0.7x
Quick ratio 1.6x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.2x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.67 3.19 3.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLHOSKWCN
Dividend yield – 1.5% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 1.3% 3.8% 2.3%
Shareholder yield 1.3% 5.3% 3.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 32.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 28.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 9.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 10.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLHOSKWCN
Forward P/E 28.7xFY2026 14.3xFY2026 34.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.29FY2026 $10.00FY2026 $5.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +41.3%FY2026 -7.3%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.3% +46.4% +18.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.28BFY2026 $10.70BFY2026 $10.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% +5.3% 0.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLHOSKWCN
Held by institutions 93.5% 100.0% 85.2%
Institutions holding 660 600 831
Change in shares held, QoQ 0.0% +5.1% +1.3%
Institutions buying 308 310 412
Institutions selling 246 188 303
Buyers to sellers 1.25 1.65 1.36

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLHOSKWCN
CLH 1.00 0.15 0.37
OSK 0.15 1.00 0.07
WCN 0.37 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLH, OSK and WCN?

Waste Connections (WCN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Clean Harbors (CLH) $15.10B, Oshkosh (OSK) $8.91B, Waste Connections (WCN) $48.09B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLH, OSK and WCN?

Oshkosh (OSK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Clean Harbors (CLH) 28.6x, Oshkosh (OSK) 17.9x, Waste Connections (WCN) 45.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Oshkosh (OSK) is cheapest (Clean Harbors (CLH) 28.7x, Oshkosh (OSK) 14.3x, Waste Connections (WCN) 34.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Clean Harbors (CLH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Clean Harbors (CLH) +10.1%, Oshkosh (OSK) +4.2%, Waste Connections (WCN) +5.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Waste Connections (WCN) has the highest net margin (Clean Harbors (CLH) 8.0%, Oshkosh (OSK) 4.6%, Waste Connections (WCN) 10.9%). On return on invested capital, Clean Harbors (CLH) leads (Clean Harbors (CLH) 10.9%, Oshkosh (OSK) 10.2%, Waste Connections (WCN) 7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Clean Harbors (CLH) returned the most: Clean Harbors (CLH) +40.7%, Oshkosh (OSK) +18.0%, Waste Connections (WCN) +12.2%. Over five years, Clean Harbors (CLH) compounded fastest (Clean Harbors (CLH) +22.5%/yr, Oshkosh (OSK) +5.4%/yr, Waste Connections (WCN) +6.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Clean Harbors (CLH) 0.00%, Oshkosh (OSK) 0.00%, Waste Connections (WCN) 0.01%. Clean Harbors (CLH) and Oshkosh (OSK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Clean Harbors (CLH) has been the steadiest (Clean Harbors (CLH) 25.0%, Oshkosh (OSK) 39.7%, Waste Connections (WCN) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLH, OSK and WCN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Clean Harbors (CLH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.