CLH vs IRM vs ECVT Stock Comparison

Clean Harbors, Iron Mountain and Ecovyst Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SHC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CLH Clean Harbors Inc
$309.47 -0.7% 1M +42.0% 1Y
Market cap
$15.92B
P/E
30.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.56B
Div. yield
–
Hazardous Waste Industrials
8 wins
IRM Iron Mountain Inc
$118.43 +6.3% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$34.52B
P/E
82.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.56B
Div. yield
0.03%
Facility Services Industrials
1 win
ECVT Ecovyst Inc.
$10.23 +4.3% 1M +23.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.10B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$869.26M
Div. yield
–
Commodity Chemicals Basic Materials
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Clean Harbors leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Clean Harbors 8, Ecovyst 2, Iron Mountain 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLHIRMECVTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.92B $34.52B $1.10B IRM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.1x 82.5x -17.9x CLH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.1x 51.0x 15.3x ECVT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.1% +17.4% +39.8% ECVT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.0% 5.5% -7.1% CLH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% 7.6% 3.8% CLH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 6.7x 2.5x CLH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +42.0% +16.9% +23.3% CLH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.4%/yr +21.0%/yr -2.6%/yr CLH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 24.9% 33.2% 32.6% CLH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 47/100 58/100 CLH

Percentile Scorecard

CLHIRMECVT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLHIRMECVT
Valuation 60 #7 of 16 20 #91 of 113 72 #27 of 94
Growth 77 #4 of 14 91 #10 of 96 34 #61 of 92
Profitability 92 #2 of 14 67 #31 of 91 51 #43 of 86
Financial Health 64 #6 of 15 8 #112 of 122 40 #56 of 93
Shareholder Returns – 51 #33 of 66 94 #5 of 71
Overall 73 47 58
  • CLH ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • IRM ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ECVT ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLHIRMECVTSPY
1 month -0.7%+6.3%+4.3% +0.7%
3 months -2.5%-5.0%-15.5% +3.7%
6 months -1.0%-6.0%-27.9% +7.1%
Year to date +32.0%+42.8%+5.1% +12.8%
1 year +42.0%+16.9%+23.3% +11.9%
3 years +103.1%+103.2%+12.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +26.7%+26.7%+4.1% +22.8%
5 years +175.0%+159.5%-12.4% +67.6%
5 years, per year +22.4%+21.0%-2.6% +10.9%
10 years +558.7%+260.7%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +20.7%+13.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCLHIRMECVTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 24.9%33.2%32.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.9%34.3%33.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.261.160.71 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.690.510.71 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -30.9%-40.0%-59.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.4%-11.0%-31.7% -1.2%
52-week high $327.10$133.06$14.97 $779.14
52-week low $201.73$78.86$7.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLHIRMECVT
P/E now vs peer median 30.9xmedian 30.9x 84.2xmedian 21.9x -18.3xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 3.2x 4.7xmedian 0.9x 1.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 14.0x 20.6xmedian 11.9x 9.3xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 32.6xmedian 17.3x -71.8xmedian 14.4x 14.7xmedian 15.5x
P/B now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 2.8x -27.5xmedian 2.4x 1.9xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 2.13median 2.44 32.23median 0.97 0.42median 1.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLHIRMECVT
Revenue $6.56B $7.56B $869.26M
Gross profit $2.17B $4.10B $185.09M
Operating income $864.39M $1.42B $81.98M
Net income $528.36M $434.46M -$61.34M
Free cash flow $500.54M -$490.92M $76.10M
EPS (diluted) $9.99 $1.40 $-0.55
Cash & equivalents $423.54M $204.79M $87.76M
Total debt $2.89B $17.35B $492.95M
Shares (diluted) 52.90M 299.85M 110.84M
Enterprise value $13.27B $33.72B $566.18M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLHIRMECVT
P/E 30.9x 84.2x -18.3x
P/FCF 32.6x -71.8x 14.7x
P/Operating cash flow 16.0x 21.3x 7.4x
P/S 2.5x 4.7x 1.3x
P/B 5.2x -27.5x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 7.3x -14.0x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA 14.0x 20.6x 9.3x
EV/EBIT 21.6x 36.9x 18.6x
EV/Revenue 2.8x 6.9x 1.8x
EV/FCF 37.3x -106.7x 20.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.3x 31.7x 10.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.13 32.23 0.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLHIRMECVT
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.1% 17.4% 39.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.1% 13.0% 4.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.2% 13.5% 25.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.0% 11.1% -4.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 32.6% 35.4% 26.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.4% 12.8% -7.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 36.0% 867.3% -345.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 13.4% 4.1% -42.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 38.1% 897.5% -368.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.5% 2.6% -43.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.0% 31.7% 3.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.1% 17.2% -4.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 11.2% 50.3% -14.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.1% -60.8% -9.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLHIRMECVT
Gross margin 33.1% 54.2% 21.3%
EBITDA margin 20.3% 33.6% 18.9%
Operating margin 13.2% 18.8% 9.4%
Pretax margin 10.9% 6.7% 6.1%
Net margin 8.0% 5.5% -7.1%
FCF margin 7.6% -6.5% 8.8%
Operating cash flow margin 15.5% 21.9% 17.5%
Return on equity 17.5% – -10.6%
Return on assets 6.6% 2.0% -4.6%
Return on invested capital 10.9% 7.6% 3.8%
Return on capital employed 12.8% 7.5% 6.9%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 3.8x -2.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 1.8% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLHIRMECVT
Debt / assets 34.9% 79.0% 34.7%
Debt / equity 0.9x -13.5x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x 6.7x 2.5x
Debt / FCF 5.8x -35.3x 6.5x
Liabilities / assets 62.4% 105.8% 58.7%
Equity / assets 37.6% -5.8% 41.3%
Interest coverage – – 3.4x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.7x 1.7x
Quick ratio 1.6x 0.6x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 3.75 1.79 1.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLHIRMECVT
Dividend yield – 2.9% –
Net buyback yield 1.3% – 5.5%
Shareholder yield 1.3% 2.9% 5.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 229.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -203.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 16.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 11.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLHIRMECVT
Forward P/E 30.1xFY2026 51.0xFY2026 15.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.29FY2026 $2.32FY2026 $0.67FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +41.3%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026 +71.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.3% +28.0% +25.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.28BFY2026 $8.36BFY2026 $1.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026 +50.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% +2.2% -8.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLHIRMECVT
Held by institutions 93.5% 86.2% 99.9%
Institutions holding 659 1,162 209
Change in shares held, QoQ 0.0% +1.9% -2.2%
Institutions buying 307 599 127
Institutions selling 246 377 54
Buyers to sellers 1.25 1.59 2.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLHIRMECVT
CLH 1.00 0.17 0.20
IRM 0.17 1.00 0.19
ECVT 0.20 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLH, IRM and ECVT?

Iron Mountain (IRM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Clean Harbors (CLH) $15.92B, Iron Mountain (IRM) $34.52B, Ecovyst (ECVT) $1.10B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLH, IRM and ECVT?

Clean Harbors (CLH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Clean Harbors (CLH) 30.1x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 82.5x, Ecovyst (ECVT) -17.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ecovyst (ECVT) is cheapest (Clean Harbors (CLH) 30.1x, Iron Mountain (IRM) 51.0x, Ecovyst (ECVT) 15.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ecovyst (ECVT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Clean Harbors (CLH) +10.1%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +17.4%, Ecovyst (ECVT) +39.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Clean Harbors (CLH) has the highest net margin (Clean Harbors (CLH) 8.0%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 5.5%, Ecovyst (ECVT) -7.1%). On return on invested capital, Clean Harbors (CLH) leads (Clean Harbors (CLH) 10.9%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 7.6%, Ecovyst (ECVT) 3.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Clean Harbors (CLH) returned the most: Clean Harbors (CLH) +42.0%, Iron Mountain (IRM) +16.9%, Ecovyst (ECVT) +23.3%. Over five years, Clean Harbors (CLH) compounded fastest (Clean Harbors (CLH) +22.4%/yr, Iron Mountain (IRM) +21.0%/yr, Ecovyst (ECVT) -2.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Clean Harbors (CLH) 0.00%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 0.03%, Ecovyst (ECVT) 0.00%. Clean Harbors (CLH) and Ecovyst (ECVT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Clean Harbors (CLH) has been the steadiest (Clean Harbors (CLH) 24.9%, Iron Mountain (IRM) 33.2%, Ecovyst (ECVT) 32.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLH, IRM and ECVT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Clean Harbors (CLH) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.