CLEV vs ROK vs FTV Stock Comparison

Concrete Leveling Systems, Rockwell Automation and Fortive Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MTD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc
$444.02 +3.0% 1M +22.7% 1Y
Market cap
$49.93B
P/E
41.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.97B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
4 wins
FTV Fortive Corp
$64.13 +15.0% 1M +30.5% 1Y
Market cap
$19.63B
P/E
30.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.40B
Div. yield
0.00%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fortive leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Fortive 5, Rockwell Automation 4, Concrete Leveling Systems 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLEVROKFTVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.12M $49.93B $19.63B ROK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -298.3x 41.6x 30.1x FTV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 35.5x 20.0x FTV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6,824.8% +11.3% +7.0% CLEV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -54.4% 13.4% 14.8% FTV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 21.0% 8.1% ROK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -5.2x 1.3x 2.4x CLEV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -5.8% +22.7% +30.5% FTV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -18.0%/yr +6.8%/yr -3.3%/yr ROK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 204.1% 31.3% 27.0% FTV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 54/100 49/100 ROK

Percentile Scorecard

CLEVROKFTV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLEVROKFTV
Valuation 6 #190 of 203 16 #170 of 203 49 #105 of 203
Growth 98 #5 of 188 51 #93 of 188 25 #141 of 188
Profitability 43 #105 of 184 96 #9 of 184 75 #46 of 184
Financial Health 5 #207 of 217 34 #143 of 217 38 #135 of 217
Shareholder Returns – 74 #41 of 153 58 #65 of 153
Overall 38 54 49
  • CLEV ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ROK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • FTV ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLEVROKFTVSPY
1 month -28.6%+3.0%+15.0% +0.9%
3 months -35.0%-3.3%+7.7% +5.9%
6 months +66.7%+10.9%+3.9% +8.5%
Year to date +62.5%+14.1%+16.2% +13.3%
1 year -5.8%+22.7%+30.5% +12.4%
3 years -40.9%+69.5%-1.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year -16.1%+19.2%-0.5% +23.5%
5 years -62.9%+39.0%-15.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year -18.0%+6.8%-3.3% +11.0%
10 years -72.3%+273.8%+27.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year -12.1%+14.1%+2.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCLEVROKFTVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 204.1%31.3%27.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 497.2%31.8%26.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.481.400.61 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.030.721.13 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.1%-45.6%-46.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.1%-10.3%0.0% -0.9%
52-week high $1.05$495.08$64.16 $779.14
52-week low $0.34$348.51$49.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLEVROKFTV
P/E now vs peer median -298.3xmedian 25.4x 41.1xmedian 25.4x 29.6xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 162.4xmedian 1.9x 5.5xmedian 1.9x 4.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -260.6xmedian 14.3x 24.9xmedian 14.3x 16.9xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 201.5xmedian 21.8x 32.8xmedian 21.8x 17.6xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median -14.2xmedian 2.2x 14.1xmedian 2.2x 3.2xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.41 -9.36median 1.41 -11.18median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLEVROKFTV
Revenue $56.16K $8.97B $4.40B
Gross profit $54.81K $4.41B $2.79B
Operating income -$21.26K $1.77B $863.00M
Net income -$30.56K $1.20B $651.90M
Free cash flow $45.24K $1.50B $1.09B
R&D – $716.00M $268.20M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $10.76 $2.15
Cash & equivalents $1.12K $479.00M $377.30M
Total debt $755.04K $13.81B $3.51B
Shares (diluted) 14.03M 111.60M 303.90M
Enterprise value $9.07M $48.12B $18.15B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLEVROKFTV
P/E -298.3x 41.1x 29.6x
P/FCF 201.5x 32.8x 17.6x
P/Operating cash flow 201.5x 28.5x 15.9x
P/S 162.4x 5.5x 4.3x
P/B -14.2x 14.1x 3.2x
P/Tangible book -14.2x 17.7x 4.7x
EV/EBITDA -260.6x 24.9x 16.9x
EV/EBIT -437.6x 29.4x 25.8x
EV/Revenue 165.7x 5.8x 5.1x
EV/FCF 205.7x 34.6x 20.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 205.7x 30.1x 18.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -9.36 -11.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLEVROKFTV
Revenue growth (1Y) 6,825% 11.3% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 283.6% 1.3% -9.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9,811% 1.9% 6.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 355.2% 7.5% -7.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 58.3% -7.1% 22.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 19.0% 2.9% -8.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 81.2% 23.8% 8.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 38.3% -5.5% -7.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 55.1% 25.2% 18.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -4.4% -2.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 936.2% 13.8% -1.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.2% 22.8% -4.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 936.2% 13.9% -3.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.2% 23.6% -4.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLEVROKFTV
Gross margin 97.6% 49.1% 63.5%
EBITDA margin -63.6% 23.3% 29.9%
Operating margin -37.9% 19.7% 19.6%
Pretax margin -54.4% 14.7% 16.8%
Net margin -54.4% 13.4% 14.8%
FCF margin 80.6% 16.8% 24.7%
Operating cash flow margin 80.6% 19.3% 27.3%
Return on equity – 30.9% 10.8%
Return on assets -94.4% 9.8% 5.6%
Return on invested capital – 21.0% 8.1%
Return on capital employed – 23.6% 8.4%
Asset turnover 1.7x 0.8x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.5x 1.4x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.0% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLEVROKFTV
Debt / assets 819.3% 29.4% 30.6%
Debt / equity -0.3x 0.9x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -5.2x 1.3x 2.4x
Debt / FCF 4.1x 2.2x 3.2x
Liabilities / assets 2,905% 68.5% 48.2%
Equity / assets -2,805% 31.5% 51.8%
Interest coverage -2.2x 12.8x 4.9x
Current ratio 0.0x 1.1x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.0x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score -92.77 6.00 3.44

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLEVROKFTV
Dividend yield – 1.2% 0.4%
Net buyback yield – 1.4% 6.7%
Shareholder yield – 2.7% 7.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 11.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 7.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -24.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -8.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLEVROKFTV
Forward P/E – 35.5xFY2026 20.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $12.50FY2026 $3.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +18.7%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +12.3% -3.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $8.50BFY2026 $4.63BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.9%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +19.4% -6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLEVROKFTV
Held by institutions – 89.2% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 1,541 803
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.5% +2.8%
Institutions buying – 806 350
Institutions selling – 437 301
Buyers to sellers – 1.84 1.16

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLEVROKFTV
CLEV 1.00 -0.10 0.03
ROK -0.10 1.00 0.36
FTV 0.03 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLEV, ROK and FTV?

Rockwell Automation (ROK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Concrete Leveling Systems (CLEV) $9.12M, Rockwell Automation (ROK) $49.93B, Fortive (FTV) $19.63B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLEV, ROK and FTV?

Fortive (FTV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Concrete Leveling Systems (CLEV) -298.3x, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 41.6x, Fortive (FTV) 30.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fortive (FTV) is cheapest (Rockwell Automation (ROK) 35.5x, Fortive (FTV) 20.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Concrete Leveling Systems (CLEV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Concrete Leveling Systems (CLEV) +6,824.8%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +11.3%, Fortive (FTV) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortive (FTV) has the highest net margin (Concrete Leveling Systems (CLEV) -54.4%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 13.4%, Fortive (FTV) 14.8%). On return on invested capital, Rockwell Automation (ROK) leads (Rockwell Automation (ROK) 21.0%, Fortive (FTV) 8.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortive (FTV) returned the most: Concrete Leveling Systems (CLEV) -5.8%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +22.7%, Fortive (FTV) +30.5%. Over five years, Rockwell Automation (ROK) compounded fastest (Concrete Leveling Systems (CLEV) -18.0%/yr, Rockwell Automation (ROK) +6.8%/yr, Fortive (FTV) -3.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Rockwell Automation (ROK) 0.00%, Fortive (FTV) 0.00%. Concrete Leveling Systems (CLEV) and Rockwell Automation (ROK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortive (FTV) has been the steadiest (Concrete Leveling Systems (CLEV) 204.1%, Rockwell Automation (ROK) 31.3%, Fortive (FTV) 27.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLEV, ROK and FTV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortive (FTV) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.