CLBT vs ZS vs FTNT Stock Comparison

Cellebrite DI, Zscaler and Fortinet Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd.
$11.92 +7.7% 1M -35.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.95B
P/E
50.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$514.29M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
2 wins
ZS Zscaler, Inc.
$255.80 +28.3% 1M -22.2% 1Y
Market cap
$39.40B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$174.08 -1.3% 1M +102.7% 1Y
Market cap
$99.41B
P/E
43.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.88B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Fortinet leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Fortinet 6, Cellebrite DI 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLBTZSFTNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.95B $39.40B $99.41B FTNT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 50.2x -648.7x 43.6x FTNT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 44.1x 56.2x 48.6x CLBT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.8% — +20.2% FTNT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.4% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.9% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.5x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -35.5% -22.2% +102.7% FTNT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.3%/yr -4.3%/yr +21.0%/yr FTNT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 63.9% 71.1% 43.2% FTNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 — 52/100 CLBT

Percentile Scorecard

CLBTZSFTNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLBTZSFTNT
Valuation 78 #28 of 124 15 #105 of 124 31 #86 of 124
Growth 78 #26 of 113 – 67 #38 of 113
Profitability 93 #9 of 109 – 96 #5 of 109
Financial Health 66 #44 of 127 32 #87 of 127 15 #108 of 127
Shareholder Returns 40 #38 of 63 – –
Overall 71 – 52
  • CLBT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ZS ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FTNT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLBTZSFTNTSPY
1 month +7.7%+28.3%-1.3% +0.9%
3 months -20.9%+66.4%+13.6% +5.9%
6 months -6.2%+89.9%+102.2% +8.5%
Year to date -33.9%+13.7%+119.2% +13.3%
1 year -35.5%-22.2%+102.7% +12.4%
3 years +84.8%+65.7%+209.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year +22.7%+18.3%+45.8% +23.5%
5 years +6.7%-19.8%+158.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year +1.3%-4.3%+21.0% +11.0%
10 years ——+2,637.1% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——+39.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCLBTZSFTNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 63.9%71.1%43.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.5%82.4%38.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.550.950.98 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.56-0.312.38 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.1%-76.4%-38.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.2%-23.9%-10.6% -0.9%
52-week high $19.28$336.27$194.75 $779.14
52-week low $10.44$118.05$75.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLBTZSFTNT
P/E now vs peer median 49.0xmedian 37.9x -648.7xmedian 37.9x 55.9xmedian 37.9x
P/S now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 4.4x 12.4xmedian 4.4x 16.2xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 34.5xmedian 34.5x —median 34.5x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.7xmedian 26.6x 48.9xmedian 26.6x 41.4xmedian 26.6x
P/B now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 3.4x 16.1xmedian 3.4x 56.8xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.06median 1.24 —median 1.24 1.96median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLBTZSFTNT
Revenue $514.29M – $7.88B
Gross profit $426.66M – –
Operating income $55.86M – $2.60B
Net income $58.76M – $2.28B
Free cash flow $158.73M – –
R&D $129.82M – $857.40M
EPS (diluted) $0.24 – $3.08
Cash & equivalents $141.25M $928.35M $3.75B
Total debt $71.94M – –
Shares (diluted) 249.90M 160.22M 739.90M
Enterprise value $1.69B $25.52B $99.41B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLBTZSFTNT
P/E 49.0x -648.7x 55.9x
P/FCF 18.7x 48.9x 41.4x
P/Operating cash flow 18.9x – 34.6x
P/S 5.8x 12.4x 16.2x
P/B 5.5x 16.1x 56.8x
P/Tangible book 7.1x 17.5x 56.8x
EV/EBITDA 34.5x – –
EV/EBIT 48.4x – –
EV/Revenue 5.3x – 16.2x
EV/FCF 17.0x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 17.2x – 34.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.06 – 1.96

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLBTZSFTNT
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.8% – 20.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 20.5% – 15.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.8% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.9% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -9.7% – 27.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 61.2% – 28.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 138.9% – 21.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 51.0% – 25.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 132.6% – 25.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 46.2% – 28.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.2% – 50.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.9% – 17.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -0.9% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.9% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLBTZSFTNT
Gross margin 83.0% – –
EBITDA margin 15.2% – –
Operating margin 10.9% – –
Pretax margin 14.7% – –
Net margin 11.4% – –
FCF margin 30.9% – –
Operating cash flow margin 30.6% – 46.8%
Return on equity 11.2% – 120.1%
Return on assets 6.0% – 20.0%
Return on invested capital 7.9% – –
Return on capital employed 9.2% – –
Asset turnover 0.5x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.7x – 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 11.1% – 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLBTZSFTNT
Debt / assets 2.5% – –
Debt / equity 0.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -3.5x – –
Debt / FCF 0.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 45.9% 67.0% 81.2%
Equity / assets 54.1% 33.0% 18.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.6x 1.7x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.6x –
Cash ratio 0.8x 1.2x –
Altman Z-score 4.79 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLBTZSFTNT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.4% – –
Shareholder yield -0.4% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLBTZSFTNT
Forward P/E 44.1xFY2026 56.2xFY2027 48.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.27FY2026 $4.55FY2027 $3.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -12.9%FY2026 +8.1%FY2027 +29.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +33.3% +27.0% +0.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $593.75MFY2026 $4.07BFY2027 $8.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.8%FY2026 +21.5%FY2027 +23.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.1% +19.4% +13.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLBTZSFTNT
Held by institutions 51.4% 51.4% 68.6%
Institutions holding 199 734 1,567
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.4% -3.9% +23.7%
Institutions buying 117 416 854
Institutions selling 60 236 549
Buyers to sellers 1.95 1.76 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLBTZSFTNT
CLBT 1.00 0.35 0.34
ZS 0.35 1.00 0.59
FTNT 0.34 0.59 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLBT, ZS and FTNT?

Fortinet (FTNT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cellebrite DI (CLBT) $2.95B, Zscaler (ZS) $39.40B, Fortinet (FTNT) $99.41B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLBT, ZS and FTNT?

Fortinet (FTNT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 50.2x, Zscaler (ZS) -648.7x, Fortinet (FTNT) 43.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) is cheapest (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 44.1x, Zscaler (ZS) 56.2x, Fortinet (FTNT) 48.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fortinet (FTNT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +17.8%, Fortinet (FTNT) +20.2%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortinet (FTNT) returned the most: Cellebrite DI (CLBT) -35.5%, Zscaler (ZS) -22.2%, Fortinet (FTNT) +102.7%. Over five years, Fortinet (FTNT) compounded fastest (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +1.3%/yr, Zscaler (ZS) -4.3%/yr, Fortinet (FTNT) +21.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortinet (FTNT) has been the steadiest (Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 63.9%, Zscaler (ZS) 71.1%, Fortinet (FTNT) 43.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLBT, ZS and FTNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortinet (FTNT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.