CIEN vs IOTR vs KHOBF Stock Comparison

Ciena, iOThree and Kheoba Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (UI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CIEN Ciena Corp
$349.15 -1.6% 1M +84.5% 1Y
Market cap
$45.23B
P/E
69.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.02B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
2 wins
IOTR iOThree Ltd
$2.06 0.0% 1M -34.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.73M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Ciena leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Ciena 2, Kheoba 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCIENIOTRKHOBFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $45.23B $4.73M $20.23M CIEN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 69.1x -4.7x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 45.9x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.6% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.9% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +84.5% -34.4% 0.0% CIEN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +45.1%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 77.9% 146.0% 0.0% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

CIENIOTRKHOBF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCIENIOTRKHOBF
Valuation 21 #89 of 112 57 #49 of 112 –
Growth 94 #7 of 108 – –
Profitability 84 #18 of 104 – –
Financial Health 41 #69 of 116 50 #59 of 116 81 #21 of 108
Shareholder Returns 36 #50 of 78 – –
Overall 55 – –
  • CIEN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • IOTR ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • KHOBF ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCIENIOTRKHOBFSPY
1 month -1.6%0.0%0.0% +0.7%
3 months -6.1%-33.8%0.0% +3.7%
6 months -33.8%-24.5%0.0% +7.1%
Year to date +49.3%-15.6%0.0% +12.8%
1 year +84.5%-34.4%0.0% +11.9%
3 years +750.3%—— +85.2%
3 years, per year +104.2%—— +22.8%
5 years +543.1%—— +67.6%
5 years, per year +45.1%—— +10.9%
10 years +1,689.6%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +33.4%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCIENIOTRKHOBFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 77.9%146.0%0.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 82.7%125.2%— 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.801.410.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.08-0.24— 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.7%-96.2%-37.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.3%-61.4%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $627.00$5.33$2.50 $779.14
52-week low $176.45$1.56$2.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCIENIOTRKHOBF
P/E now vs peer median 75.8xmedian 32.9x -4.7xmedian 32.9x —median 28.0x
P/S now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 2.9x 0.3xmedian 2.9x —median 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 55.9xmedian 20.0x —median 20.0x —median 16.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 60.8xmedian 30.2x -1.7xmedian 30.2x —median 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 2.9x 1.1xmedian 2.9x 122.0xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.69median 1.08 —median 1.08 —median 0.89

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCIENIOTRKHOBF
Revenue $6.02B – –
Gross profit $2.65B – –
Operating income $738.95M – –
Net income $654.41M – –
Free cash flow $814.36M – –
R&D $924.94M – –
EPS (diluted) $4.48 – –
Cash & equivalents $2.45B $2.12M $318.16K
Total debt $3.23B $376.70K –
Shares (diluted) 145.97M 2.64M 8.09M
Enterprise value $38.79B $329.51K $19.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCIENIOTRKHOBF
P/E 75.8x -4.7x –
P/FCF 60.8x -1.7x –
P/Operating cash flow 47.0x – –
P/S 8.2x 0.3x –
P/B 16.2x 1.1x 122.0x
P/Tangible book 17.3x 1.2x 125.8x
EV/EBITDA 55.9x – –
EV/EBIT 67.9x – –
EV/Revenue 8.3x – –
EV/FCF 61.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 47.5x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.69 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCIENIOTRKHOBF
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.6% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.5% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 40.6% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.3% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 200.1% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.1% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 364.5% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 43.5% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 359.9% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.8% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 34.5% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 201.2% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 34.5% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 95.4% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCIENIOTRKHOBF
Gross margin 44.1% – –
EBITDA margin 14.9% – –
Operating margin 12.3% – –
Pretax margin 12.1% – –
Net margin 10.9% – –
FCF margin 13.5% – –
Operating cash flow margin 17.5% – –
Return on equity 22.0% – –
Return on assets 9.3% – –
Return on invested capital 12.4% – –
Return on capital employed 13.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.9x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x – –
Stock comp / revenue 3.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCIENIOTRKHOBF
Debt / assets 40.4% 4.4% –
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x – –
Debt / FCF 4.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 61.8% 47.3% 49.8%
Equity / assets 38.2% 52.7% 50.2%
Interest coverage 10.6x – –
Current ratio 3.8x 1.8x 2.0x
Quick ratio 2.8x 1.0x 2.0x
Cash ratio 1.9x 0.7x 1.9x
Altman Z-score 7.21 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCIENIOTRKHOBF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -1.0% – –
Shareholder yield -1.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCIENIOTRKHOBF
Forward P/E 45.9xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $7.60FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +187.9%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +64.7% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.86BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +43.8%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +18.0% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCIENIOTRKHOBF
Held by institutions 92.9% – –
Institutions holding 1,221 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.7% – –
Institutions buying 730 – –
Institutions selling 379 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.93 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CIENIOTRKHOBF
CIEN 1.00 0.06 –
IOTR 0.06 1.00 –
KHOBF – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CIEN, IOTR and KHOBF?

Ciena (CIEN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ciena (CIEN) $45.23B, iOThree (IOTR) $4.73M, Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ciena (CIEN) returned the most: Ciena (CIEN) +84.5%, iOThree (IOTR) -34.4%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (Ciena (CIEN) 77.9%, iOThree (IOTR) 146.0%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CIEN, IOTR and KHOBF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ciena (CIEN) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.