CIEN vs DOX vs GILT Stock Comparison

Ciena, Amdocs and Gilat Satellite Networks Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CSCO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CIEN Ciena Corp
$349.15 -1.6% 1M +84.5% 1Y
Market cap
$45.23B
P/E
69.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.02B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
4 wins
DOX Amdocs Ltd
$62.22 +8.0% 1M -26.1% 1Y
Market cap
$6.98B
P/E
15.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.65B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Ciena leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ciena 4, Gilat Satellite Networks 3, Amdocs 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCIENDOXGILTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $45.23B $6.98B $458.79M CIEN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 69.1x 15.3x 15.2x GILT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 45.9x 7.9x 13.0x DOX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.6% +0.1% +39.5% GILT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.9% 9.8% 6.2% CIEN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 0.9x -2.9x GILT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +84.5% -26.1% -44.3% CIEN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +45.1%/yr -4.4%/yr -0.3%/yr CIEN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 77.9% 29.8% 69.5% DOX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 64/100 57/100 DOX

Percentile Scorecard

CIENDOXGILT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCIENDOXGILT
Valuation 21 #89 of 112 90 #12 of 112 85 #18 of 112
Growth 94 #7 of 108 14 #93 of 108 64 #40 of 108
Profitability 84 #18 of 104 83 #19 of 104 46 #57 of 104
Financial Health 41 #69 of 116 37 #74 of 116 79 #25 of 116
Shareholder Returns 36 #50 of 78 95 #5 of 78 10 #70 of 78
Overall 55 64 57
  • CIEN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • DOX ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • GILT ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCIENDOXGILTSPY
1 month -1.6%+8.0%-19.0% +0.7%
3 months -6.1%+12.6%-26.8% +3.7%
6 months -33.8%-3.8%-56.4% +7.1%
Year to date +49.3%-22.7%-37.8% +12.8%
1 year +84.5%-26.1%-44.3% +11.9%
3 years +750.3%-21.2%+38.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year +104.2%-7.7%+11.4% +22.8%
5 years +543.1%-20.1%-1.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +45.1%-4.4%-0.3% +10.9%
10 years +1,689.6%+6.3%+82.1% +262.0%
10 years, per year +33.4%+0.6%+6.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCIENDOXGILTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 77.9%29.8%69.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 82.7%32.6%74.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.800.252.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.08-0.87-0.64 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.7%-49.5%-64.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -44.3%-27.2%-61.4% -1.2%
52-week high $627.00$85.49$20.85 $779.14
52-week low $176.45$49.87$7.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCIENDOXGILT
P/E now vs peer median 75.8xmedian 32.9x 15.1xmedian 32.9x 15.8xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 2.9x 1.5xmedian 2.9x 1.2xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 55.9xmedian 20.0x 9.0xmedian 20.0x 8.1xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 60.8xmedian 30.2x 7.9xmedian 30.2x 30.5xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 16.2xmedian 2.9x 2.0xmedian 2.9x 1.1xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 1.69median 1.08 -4.14median 1.08 0.23median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCIENDOXGILT
Revenue $6.02B $4.65B $487.79M
Gross profit $2.65B $1.78B $147.93M
Operating income $738.95M $626.70M $29.58M
Net income $654.41M $457.53M $30.27M
Free cash flow $814.36M $858.80M $19.47M
R&D $924.94M $343.21M $46.44M
EPS (diluted) $4.48 $4.17 $0.50
Cash & equivalents $2.45B $206.45M $144.81M
Total debt $3.23B $3.25B $123.15M
Shares (diluted) 145.97M 109.66M 60.40M
Enterprise value $38.79B $5.99B -$211.17M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCIENDOXGILT
P/E 75.8x 15.1x 15.8x
P/FCF 60.8x 7.9x 30.5x
P/Operating cash flow 47.0x 9.0x 73.7x
P/S 8.2x 1.5x 1.2x
P/B 16.2x 2.0x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 17.3x 2.2x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 55.9x 9.0x 8.1x
EV/EBIT 67.9x 11.9x 14.8x
EV/Revenue 8.3x 1.6x 0.9x
EV/FCF 61.6x 8.7x 22.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 47.5x 10.0x 54.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.69 -4.14 0.23

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCIENDOXGILT
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.6% 0.1% 39.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.5% -1.1% 23.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 40.6% 2.9% 24.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.3% 1.5% 13.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 200.1% -11.9% 31.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.1% -3.0% 10.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 364.5% -18.0% 35.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 43.5% -7.0% 71.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 359.9% -14.5% 27.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.8% -3.7% 67.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 34.5% 1.6% -72.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 201.2% -0.8% -35.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 34.5% 2.8% -48.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 95.4% -3.2% -14.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCIENDOXGILT
Gross margin 44.1% 38.3% 30.3%
EBITDA margin 14.9% 17.9% 11.0%
Operating margin 12.3% 13.5% 6.1%
Pretax margin 12.1% 12.5% 6.3%
Net margin 10.9% 9.8% 6.2%
FCF margin 13.5% 18.5% 4.0%
Operating cash flow margin 17.5% 16.1% 1.7%
Return on equity 22.0% – 5.8%
Return on assets 9.3% 7.2% 4.1%
Return on invested capital 12.4% – –
Return on capital employed 13.1% 13.4% 5.3%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.6x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 3.5% 2.4% 3.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCIENDOXGILT
Debt / assets 40.4% 14.5% 0.3%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.3x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 0.9x -2.9x
Debt / FCF 4.0x 1.1x 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 61.8% 48.1% 28.5%
Equity / assets 38.2% 51.9% 71.5%
Interest coverage 10.6x – –
Current ratio 3.8x 0.9x 2.0x
Quick ratio 2.8x 1.0x 1.5x
Cash ratio 1.9x 0.1x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 7.21 3.94 1.62

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCIENDOXGILT
Dividend yield – 3.6% –
Net buyback yield -1.0% 7.8% -16.6%
Shareholder yield -1.0% 11.4% -16.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCIENDOXGILT
Forward P/E 45.9xFY2026 7.9xFY2026 13.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.60FY2026 $7.92FY2026 $0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +187.9%FY2026 +13.3%FY2026 -3.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +64.7% +4.0% +17.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.86BFY2026 $4.46BFY2026 $525.36MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +43.8%FY2026 -1.6%FY2026 +16.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.0% +5.0% +3.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCIENDOXGILT
Held by institutions 92.9% 93.0% 48.0%
Institutions holding 1,221 447 128
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.7% +0.5% -5.5%
Institutions buying 730 250 65
Institutions selling 379 152 43
Buyers to sellers 1.93 1.64 1.51

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CIENDOXGILT
CIEN 1.00 -0.20 0.36
DOX -0.20 1.00 -0.03
GILT 0.36 -0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CIEN, DOX and GILT?

Ciena (CIEN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ciena (CIEN) $45.23B, Amdocs (DOX) $6.98B, Gilat Satellite Networks (GILT) $458.79M.

Which stock is cheaper, CIEN, DOX and GILT?

Gilat Satellite Networks (GILT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ciena (CIEN) 69.1x, Amdocs (DOX) 15.3x, Gilat Satellite Networks (GILT) 15.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Amdocs (DOX) is cheapest (Ciena (CIEN) 45.9x, Amdocs (DOX) 7.9x, Gilat Satellite Networks (GILT) 13.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Gilat Satellite Networks (GILT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ciena (CIEN) +32.6%, Amdocs (DOX) +0.1%, Gilat Satellite Networks (GILT) +39.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ciena (CIEN) has the highest net margin (Ciena (CIEN) 10.9%, Amdocs (DOX) 9.8%, Gilat Satellite Networks (GILT) 6.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ciena (CIEN) returned the most: Ciena (CIEN) +84.5%, Amdocs (DOX) -26.1%, Gilat Satellite Networks (GILT) -44.3%. Over five years, Ciena (CIEN) compounded fastest (Ciena (CIEN) +45.1%/yr, Amdocs (DOX) -4.4%/yr, Gilat Satellite Networks (GILT) -0.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Amdocs (DOX) has been the steadiest (Ciena (CIEN) 77.9%, Amdocs (DOX) 29.8%, Gilat Satellite Networks (GILT) 69.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CIEN, DOX and GILT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ciena (CIEN) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.