CIB vs GS vs MS Stock Comparison

Grupo Cibest, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CIB Grupo Cibest S.A.
$95.79 +0.8% 1M +68.3% 1Y
Market cap
$92.13B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
4.95%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
6 wins
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$912.08 -2.5% 1M +15.5% 1Y
Market cap
$265.82B
P/E
12.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
1.97%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
1 win
MS Morgan Stanley
$186.98 -4.7% 1M +12.6% 1Y
Market cap
$293.92B
P/E
14.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$80.16B
Div. yield
2.22%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Grupo Cibest leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Grupo Cibest 6, Morgan Stanley 2, Goldman Sachs 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCIBGSMSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $92.13B $265.82B $293.92B MS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 12.8x 14.6x CIB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.9x 12.1x 13.7x CIB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +18.7% +16.2% GS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -5.9% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.95% 1.97% 2.22% CIB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +68.3% +15.5% +12.6% CIB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +21.6%/yr +17.1%/yr +12.8%/yr CIB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.7% 31.9% 28.4% MS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 47/100 53/100 CIB

Percentile Scorecard

CIBGSMS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCIBGSMS
Valuation 72 #102 of 360 18 #294 of 360 31 #248 of 360
Growth – 96 #8 of 191 94 #13 of 191
Profitability 14 #144 of 168 – –
Financial Health 57 #76 of 175 – –
Shareholder Returns 95 #19 of 341 27 #251 of 341 34 #225 of 341
Overall 59 47 53
  • CIB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCIBGSMSSPY
1 month +0.8%-2.5%-4.7% -0.2%
3 months +7.4%-11.7%-11.6% +3.9%
6 months +39.4%-1.6%-1.8% +8.2%
Year to date +50.6%+3.8%+5.3% +12.9%
1 year +68.3%+15.5%+12.6% +12.3%
3 years +275.5%+214.6%+165.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +55.5%+46.6%+38.5% +23.3%
5 years +165.2%+119.9%+82.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year +21.6%+17.1%+12.8% +10.9%
10 years +149.1%+413.1%+452.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.6%+17.8%+18.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCIBGSMSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.7%31.9%28.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.4%32.2%29.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.781.631.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.030.480.44 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.9%-34.0%-35.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.2%-20.8%-18.2% -1.2%
52-week high $103.26$1,152.07$228.55 $779.14
52-week low $56.73$773.70$154.37 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCIBGSMS
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 12.1x 12.8xmedian 12.1x 14.6xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 3.4x 3.8xmedian 3.4x 3.7xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.2xmedian 10.9x -6.4xmedian 10.9x -16.3xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 1.2x 2.1xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.34 0.26median 1.34 0.47median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCIBGSMS
Revenue – $69.70B $80.16B
Net income $5.74T – –
Free cash flow -$426.96B – –
EPS (diluted) – $69.89 $12.65
Cash & equivalents $27.74T $177.00B –
Total debt $31.85T – –
Shares (diluted) – 304.90M 1.57B
Enterprise value -$147.80T $265.82B $293.92B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCIBGSMS
P/E 0.0x 12.8x 14.6x
P/FCF -0.2x -6.4x -16.3x
P/Operating cash flow -0.1x – –
P/S 0.0x 3.8x 3.7x
P/B 0.0x 2.1x –
P/Tangible book 0.0x 2.1x –
EV/EBITDA 1.4x – –
EV/EBIT 1.6x – –
EV/Revenue – 3.8x 3.7x
EV/FCF 88.0x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 58.4x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.26 0.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCIBGSMS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 18.7% 16.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 15.3% 14.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 12.2% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) – 39.0% 29.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 49.3% 30.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCIBGSMS
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin – – –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity 2.3% – –
Return on assets 2.6% – 1.2%
Return on invested capital -5.9% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCIBGSMS
Debt / assets 8.8% – –
Debt / equity 0.1x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x – –
Debt / FCF -74.6x – –
Liabilities / assets – 94.3% –
Equity / assets 100.0% 5.7% –
Interest coverage -1.0x – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCIBGSMS
Dividend yield 4.9% 2.0% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 4.9% 2.0% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCIBGSMS
Forward P/E 7.9xFY2026 12.1xFY2026 13.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $12.20FY2026 $75.07FY2026 $13.66FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +179.2%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026 +33.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.5% -6.8% -4.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $9.57BFY2026 $68.80BFY2026 $80.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +45.0%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026 +13.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.0% +4.5% +13.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCIBGSMS
Held by institutions 4.2% 72.1% 85.7%
Institutions holding 212 3,149 2,742
Change in shares held, QoQ +20.8% +1.1% +1.5%
Institutions buying 110 1,552 1,468
Institutions selling 82 1,124 939
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.38 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CIBGSMS
CIB 1.00 0.32 0.25
GS 0.32 1.00 0.86
MS 0.25 0.86 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CIB, GS and MS?

Morgan Stanley (MS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grupo Cibest (CIB) $92.13B, Goldman Sachs (GS) $265.82B, Morgan Stanley (MS) $293.92B.

Which stock is cheaper, CIB, GS and MS?

Grupo Cibest (CIB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grupo Cibest (CIB) 0.0x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.8x, Morgan Stanley (MS) 14.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grupo Cibest (CIB) is cheapest (Grupo Cibest (CIB) 7.9x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.1x, Morgan Stanley (MS) 13.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Goldman Sachs (GS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%, Morgan Stanley (MS) +16.2%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Grupo Cibest (CIB) returned the most: Grupo Cibest (CIB) +68.3%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +15.5%, Morgan Stanley (MS) +12.6%. Over five years, Grupo Cibest (CIB) compounded fastest (Grupo Cibest (CIB) +21.6%/yr, Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.1%/yr, Morgan Stanley (MS) +12.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Grupo Cibest (CIB) has the highest dividend yield: Grupo Cibest (CIB) 4.95%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 1.97%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 2.22%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Morgan Stanley (MS) has been the steadiest (Grupo Cibest (CIB) 33.7%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 31.9%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 28.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CIB, GS and MS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grupo Cibest (CIB) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.