CIB vs FUTU vs MS Stock Comparison

Grupo Cibest, Futu Holdings and Morgan Stanley Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MUFG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CIB Grupo Cibest S.A.
$94.39 -1.7% 1M +62.6% 1Y
Market cap
$90.79B
P/E
50.8x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
5.02%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins
FUTU Futu Holdings Ltd
$97.92 -10.7% 1M -45.5% 1Y
Market cap
$13.73B
P/E
9.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.32B
Div. yield
2.66%
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
5 wins
MS Morgan Stanley
$193.99 +2.0% 1M +18.3% 1Y
Market cap
$304.94B
P/E
15.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$78.04B
Div. yield
2.22%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Futu Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Futu Holdings 5, Grupo Cibest 4, Morgan Stanley 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCIBFUTUMSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.79B $13.73B $304.94B MS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 50.8x 9.6x 15.4x FUTU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.7x 9.5x 14.2x CIB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +44.6% +18.0% FUTU
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 42.7% 25.0% FUTU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 28.9% 12.0% FUTU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.02% 2.66% 2.22% CIB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +62.6% -45.5% +18.3% CIB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.4%/yr +11.6%/yr +14.2%/yr CIB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.8% 61.7% 28.9% MS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 80/100 37/100 FUTU

Percentile Scorecard

CIBFUTUMS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCIBFUTUMS
Valuation 0 #359 of 360 79 #22 of 103 4 #345 of 360
Growth – 86 #11 of 70 86 #48 of 344
Profitability – 97 #3 of 74 23 #265 of 345
Financial Health 49 #172 of 339 55 #45 of 99 2 #331 of 339
Shareholder Returns 96 #14 of 352 82 #8 of 40 70 #105 of 352
Overall 49 80 37
  • CIB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • FUTU ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • MS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCIBFUTUMSSPY
1 month -1.7%-10.7%+2.0% -1.0%
3 months +4.7%-11.2%-11.1% -0.4%
6 months +41.2%-41.7%+0.3% +4.5%
Year to date +48.4%-40.4%+9.3% +12.4%
1 year +62.6%-45.5%+18.3% +13.6%
3 years +248.0%+66.8%+154.4% +76.4%
3 years, per year +51.6%+18.6%+36.5% +20.8%
5 years +174.4%+73.3%+94.2% +63.7%
5 years, per year +22.4%+11.6%+14.2% +10.4%
10 years +151.4%—+491.8% +267.7%
10 years, per year +9.7%—+19.5% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureCIBFUTUMSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.8%61.7%28.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.3%67.4%30.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.811.801.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.85-0.740.63 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.9%-60.2%-35.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.6%-47.9%-15.1% -1.6%
52-week high $103.26$188.11$228.55 $779.14
52-week low $58.06$89.76$154.37 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCIBFUTUMS
P/E now vs peer median 50.8xmedian 12.7x 9.6xmedian 29.7x 15.4xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 13.8xmedian 3.5x 4.1xmedian 3.0x 3.9xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 4.9x —median 13.6x 6.6xmedian 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 36.6xmedian 11.0x —median 15.1x -16.4xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 1.3x 2.8xmedian 2.4x 2.6xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.33 0.23median 0.55 0.52median 1.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCIBFUTUMS
Revenue – $3.32B $78.04B
Gross profit – $2.90B –
Operating income – $2.05B –
Net income – $1.42B $20.37B
Free cash flow – – -$18.58B
R&D – $263.86M –
EPS (diluted) – $10.02 $12.46
Cash & equivalents $8.00B $2.34B $160.14B
Total debt $2.50B $2.01B $392.56B
Shares (diluted) – 141.36M 1.57B
Enterprise value $82.79B $3.46B -$204.15B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCIBFUTUMS
P/E 50.8x 9.6x 15.4x
P/FCF 36.6x – -16.4x
P/Operating cash flow – – -19.6x
P/S 13.8x 4.1x 3.9x
P/B 8.5x 2.8x 2.6x
P/Tangible book 8.5x 2.8x 2.7x
EV/EBITDA – – 6.6x
EV/EBIT – 6.1x 7.0x
EV/Revenue – 3.8x 6.9x
EV/FCF – – -28.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -34.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.23 0.52

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCIBFUTUMS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 44.6% 18.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 41.3% 13.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 50.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 41.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 60.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 50.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 39.8% 36.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 40.3% 26.0%
EPS growth (1Y) – 38.5% 40.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 41.1% 29.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 11.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 27.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 11.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 25.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCIBFUTUMS
Gross margin – 87.4% –
EBITDA margin – – 104.2%
Operating margin – 62.0% –
Pretax margin – 52.3% 33.5%
Net margin – 42.7% 25.0%
FCF margin – – -23.8%
Operating cash flow margin – – -20.0%
Return on equity – 27.7% 17.5%
Return on assets – 4.1% 1.3%
Return on invested capital – 28.9% 12.0%
Return on capital employed – 96.0% –
Asset turnover – 0.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – -0.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – 2.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCIBFUTUMS
Debt / assets 2.5% 5.4% 23.4%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.4x 3.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.9x
Debt / FCF – – -21.1x
Liabilities / assets 89.5% 86.7% 93.0%
Equity / assets 10.5% 13.3% 7.0%
Interest coverage – 8.7x 1.5x
Current ratio – 1.1x –
Quick ratio – 0.1x –
Cash ratio – 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – 0.79 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCIBFUTUMS
Dividend yield 5.0% 2.7% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – – 2.4%
Shareholder yield 5.0% 2.7% 4.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCIBFUTUMS
Forward P/E 7.7xFY2026 9.5xFY2026 14.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $12.20FY2026 $10.31FY2026 $13.66FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +179.2%FY2026 0.0%FY2026 +33.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.5% +29.1% -4.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $9.57BFY2026 $3.02BFY2026 $80.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +45.0%FY2026 +3.0%FY2026 +13.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.0% +19.0% +13.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCIBFUTUMS
Held by institutions 2.2% 31.9% 85.7%
Institutions holding 212 319 2,746
Change in shares held, QoQ +20.8% +7.2% +1.5%
Institutions buying 110 157 1,471
Institutions selling 82 124 940
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.27 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CIBFUTUMS
CIB 1.00 0.29 0.26
FUTU 0.29 1.00 0.35
MS 0.26 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CIB, FUTU and MS?

Morgan Stanley (MS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grupo Cibest (CIB) $90.79B, Futu Holdings (FUTU) $13.73B, Morgan Stanley (MS) $304.94B.

Which stock is cheaper, CIB, FUTU and MS?

Futu Holdings (FUTU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grupo Cibest (CIB) 50.8x, Futu Holdings (FUTU) 9.6x, Morgan Stanley (MS) 15.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grupo Cibest (CIB) is cheapest (Grupo Cibest (CIB) 7.7x, Futu Holdings (FUTU) 9.5x, Morgan Stanley (MS) 14.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Futu Holdings (FUTU) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Futu Holdings (FUTU) +44.6%, Morgan Stanley (MS) +18.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Futu Holdings (FUTU) has the highest net margin (Futu Holdings (FUTU) 42.7%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 25.0%). On return on invested capital, Futu Holdings (FUTU) leads (Futu Holdings (FUTU) 28.9%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 12.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Grupo Cibest (CIB) returned the most: Grupo Cibest (CIB) +62.6%, Futu Holdings (FUTU) -45.5%, Morgan Stanley (MS) +18.3%. Over five years, Grupo Cibest (CIB) compounded fastest (Grupo Cibest (CIB) +22.4%/yr, Futu Holdings (FUTU) +11.6%/yr, Morgan Stanley (MS) +14.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Grupo Cibest (CIB) has the highest dividend yield: Grupo Cibest (CIB) 5.02%, Futu Holdings (FUTU) 2.66%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 2.22%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Morgan Stanley (MS) has been the steadiest (Grupo Cibest (CIB) 33.8%, Futu Holdings (FUTU) 61.7%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 28.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CIB, FUTU and MS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Futu Holdings (FUTU) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.