CIB vs BAC vs GS Stock Comparison

Grupo Cibest, Bank Of America and Goldman Sachs Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CIB Grupo Cibest S.A.
$95.79 +0.8% 1M +68.3% 1Y
Market cap
$48.28B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins
BAC Bank Of America Corp /De/
$50.68 -10.6% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$364.39B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$121.10B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
5 wins
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$912.08 -2.5% 1M +15.5% 1Y
Market cap
$278.10B
P/E
13.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Bank Of America leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Bank Of America 5, Grupo Cibest 4, Goldman Sachs 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCIBBACGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $48.28B $364.39B $278.10B BAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 11.3x 13.1x CIB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.9x 11.2x 12.1x CIB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +9.7% +18.7% GS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 26.5% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -5.9% 13.1% — BAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x -1.6x — BAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +68.3% -4.4% +15.5% CIB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +21.6%/yr +1.2%/yr +17.1%/yr CIB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.7% 21.8% 31.9% BAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 70/100 47/100 BAC

Percentile Scorecard

CIBBACGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCIBBACGS
Valuation 72 #102 of 360 96 #17 of 360 18 #294 of 360
Growth – 82 #35 of 191 96 #8 of 191
Profitability 14 #144 of 168 73 #46 of 168 –
Financial Health 57 #76 of 175 24 #133 of 175 –
Shareholder Returns 95 #19 of 341 76 #84 of 341 27 #251 of 341
Overall 59 70 47
  • CIB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • BAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCIBBACGSSPY
1 month +0.8%-10.6%-2.5% -0.2%
3 months +7.4%-19.1%-11.7% +3.9%
6 months +39.4%-3.8%-1.6% +8.2%
Year to date +50.6%-7.9%+3.8% +12.9%
1 year +68.3%-4.4%+15.5% +12.3%
3 years +275.5%+101.4%+214.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +55.5%+26.3%+46.6% +23.3%
5 years +165.2%+6.1%+119.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year +21.6%+1.2%+17.1% +10.9%
10 years +149.1%+199.7%+413.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.6%+11.6%+17.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCIBBACGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.7%21.8%31.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.4%25.6%32.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.780.721.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.03-0.200.48 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.9%-49.0%-34.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.2%-21.8%-20.8% -1.2%
52-week high $103.26$64.82$1,152.07 $779.14
52-week low $56.73$46.72$773.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCIBBACGS
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 12.1x 11.3xmedian 12.1x 12.8xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 3.4x 2.9xmedian 3.4x 3.8xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 5.0x 1.4xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -0.2xmedian 10.9x 3.8xmedian 10.9x -6.4xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 1.2x 1.2xmedian 1.2x 2.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.34 1.40median 1.34 0.26median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCIBBACGS
Revenue – $121.10B $69.70B
Net income $5.74T $33.66B –
Free cash flow -$426.96B $94.74B –
EPS (diluted) – $4.41 $69.89
Cash & equivalents $27.74T $229.75B $177.00B
Total debt $31.85T $399.84B –
Shares (diluted) – 7.29B 304.90M
Enterprise value -$149.11T -$2.01T $278.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCIBBACGS
P/E 0.0x 11.3x 12.8x
P/FCF -0.2x 3.8x -6.4x
P/Operating cash flow -0.1x 3.8x –
P/S 0.0x 2.9x 3.8x
P/B 0.0x 1.2x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 0.0x 1.2x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 1.4x 1.4x –
EV/EBIT 1.6x 1.4x –
EV/Revenue – 1.4x 3.8x
EV/FCF 88.0x 1.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 58.4x 1.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.40 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCIBBACGS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 9.7% 18.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 6.4% 15.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 12.2% 20.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 4.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 27.5% 39.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 8.0% 49.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 517.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 517.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 28.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCIBBACGS
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 99.4% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 36.2% –
Net margin – 26.5% –
FCF margin – 78.2% –
Operating cash flow margin – 78.2% –
Return on equity 2.3% 11.2% –
Return on assets 2.6% 1.0% –
Return on invested capital -5.9% 13.1% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 2.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – 3.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCIBBACGS
Debt / assets 8.8% 11.4% –
Debt / equity 0.1x 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x -1.6x –
Debt / FCF -74.6x 4.2x –
Liabilities / assets – 91.4% 94.3%
Equity / assets 100.0% 8.6% 5.7%
Interest coverage -1.0x 1.6x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCIBBACGS
Dividend yield 4.9% 2.3% 2.0%
Net buyback yield – 6.6% –
Shareholder yield 4.9% 8.9% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 10.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCIBBACGS
Forward P/E 7.9xFY2026 11.2xFY2026 12.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $12.20FY2026 $4.52FY2026 $75.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +179.2%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.5% +19.9% -6.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $9.57BFY2026 $127.79BFY2026 $68.80BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +45.0%FY2026 +13.0%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.0% -2.4% +4.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCIBBACGS
Held by institutions 4.2% 75.0% 72.1%
Institutions holding 212 3,614 3,149
Change in shares held, QoQ +20.8% +0.7% +1.1%
Institutions buying 110 1,827 1,552
Institutions selling 82 1,342 1,124
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.36 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CIBBACGS
CIB 1.00 0.23 0.32
BAC 0.23 1.00 0.57
GS 0.32 0.57 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CIB, BAC and GS?

Bank Of America (BAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grupo Cibest (CIB) $48.28B, Bank Of America (BAC) $364.39B, Goldman Sachs (GS) $278.10B.

Which stock is cheaper, CIB, BAC and GS?

Grupo Cibest (CIB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grupo Cibest (CIB) 0.0x, Bank Of America (BAC) 11.3x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 13.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grupo Cibest (CIB) is cheapest (Grupo Cibest (CIB) 7.9x, Bank Of America (BAC) 11.2x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Goldman Sachs (GS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bank Of America (BAC) +9.7%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Grupo Cibest (CIB) returned the most: Grupo Cibest (CIB) +68.3%, Bank Of America (BAC) -4.4%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +15.5%. Over five years, Grupo Cibest (CIB) compounded fastest (Grupo Cibest (CIB) +21.6%/yr, Bank Of America (BAC) +1.2%/yr, Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Grupo Cibest (CIB) 0.00%, Bank Of America (BAC) 0.03%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 0.00%. Grupo Cibest (CIB) and Goldman Sachs (GS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bank Of America (BAC) has been the steadiest (Grupo Cibest (CIB) 33.7%, Bank Of America (BAC) 21.8%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 31.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CIB, BAC and GS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bank Of America (BAC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.