CHRW vs USFD vs LSTR Stock Comparison

C. H. Robinson Worldwide, US Foods Holding and Landstar System Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EXPD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
USFD US Foods Holding Corp.
$102.82 +9.7% 1M +40.8% 1Y
Market cap
$22.52B
P/E
30.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$40.13B
Div. yield
–
Food Distribution Consumer Staples
4 wins
LSTR Landstar System Inc
$141.37 -16.1% 1M +13.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.84B
P/E
30.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.29B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Landstar System leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Landstar System 5, US Foods Holding 4, C. H. Robinson Worldwide 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHRWUSFDLSTRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.66B $22.52B $4.84B USFD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.9x 30.9x 30.2x CHRW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.8x 22.9x 23.0x CHRW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.4% +3.8% +10.7% LSTR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 1.8% 3.0% LSTR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 9.9% 17.9% LSTR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.1x -1.1x LSTR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.5% +40.8% +13.6% USFD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.6%/yr +24.3%/yr -4.3%/yr USFD
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.4% 30.1% 40.1% USFD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 48/100 51/100 LSTR

Percentile Scorecard

CHRWUSFDLSTR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHRWUSFDLSTR
Valuation 27 #100 of 136 33 #27 of 40 26 #101 of 136
Growth 53 #58 of 121 51 #19 of 38 24 #92 of 121
Profitability 41 #66 of 112 49 #19 of 36 56 #50 of 112
Financial Health 22 #110 of 140 26 #30 of 40 86 #21 of 140
Shareholder Returns 35 #52 of 80 82 #6 of 28 63 #30 of 80
Overall 36 48 51
  • CHRW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • USFD ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail
  • LSTR ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHRWUSFDLSTRSPY
1 month -14.9%+9.7%-16.1% +0.7%
3 months -13.3%+2.3%-16.5% +3.7%
6 months -29.9%+10.0%-23.2% +7.1%
Year to date -20.7%+36.5%-1.6% +12.8%
1 year -1.5%+40.8%+13.6% +11.9%
3 years +58.1%+172.9%-14.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +16.5%+39.8%-5.0% +22.8%
5 years +31.4%+196.6%-19.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year +5.6%+24.3%-4.3% +10.9%
10 years +88.5%+351.0%+100.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +6.5%+16.3%+7.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCHRWUSFDLSTRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.4%30.1%40.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.1%25.3%46.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.550.170.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.031.350.34 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.2%-32.8%-41.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.2%-7.3%-37.3% -1.2%
52-week high $209.42$110.96$225.37 $779.14
52-week low $127.43$70.05$121.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHRWUSFDLSTR
P/E now vs peer median 22.6xmedian 16.5x 30.9xmedian 22.1x 29.9xmedian 16.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.9x 0.6xmedian 0.5x 0.9xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.8x 15.9xmedian 9.5x 17.5xmedian 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.2xmedian 11.9x 23.5xmedian 16.0x 30.2xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 9.4xmedian 1.2x 5.2xmedian 2.8x 5.7xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.15median 0.84 1.32median 1.07 -1.74median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHRWUSFDLSTR
Revenue $18.22B $40.13B $5.29B
Gross profit – $7.05B –
Operating income $884.59M $1.26B $214.56M
Net income $668.81M $728.00M $160.38M
Free cash flow – $946.00M $157.62M
EPS (diluted) $5.58 $3.29 $4.73
Cash & equivalents $193.13M $56.00M $297.32M
Total debt – $5.41B $68.71M
Shares (diluted) 119.75M 221.00M 33.87M
Enterprise value $14.66B $22.32B $3.28B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHRWUSFDLSTR
P/E 22.6x 30.9x 29.9x
P/FCF 26.2x 23.5x 30.2x
P/Operating cash flow 27.9x 16.2x 27.8x
P/S 0.8x 0.6x 0.9x
P/B 9.4x 5.2x 5.7x
P/Tangible book 9.4x 6.3x 5.7x
EV/EBITDA – 15.9x 17.5x
EV/EBIT – 21.9x 20.9x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.7x 0.8x
EV/FCF – 29.2x 28.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.9x 20.2x 26.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.15 1.32 -1.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHRWUSFDLSTR
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.4% 3.8% 10.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.4% 4.7% -2.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 4.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.9% 7.2% 19.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.7% 11.2% -18.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.5% 31.6% 16.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 16.0% -18.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.9% 38.8% 19.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 23.4% -17.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -39.1% 7.1% -19.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.5% 5.7% -29.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 1.5% -20.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 0.6% -30.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHRWUSFDLSTR
Gross margin – 17.6% –
EBITDA margin – 4.3% 4.8%
Operating margin – 3.1% 4.1%
Pretax margin – 2.4% 4.0%
Net margin – 1.8% 3.0%
FCF margin – 2.4% 3.0%
Operating cash flow margin 2.9% 3.4% 3.2%
Return on equity – 16.9% 19.2%
Return on assets – 5.1% 9.0%
Return on invested capital – 9.9% 17.9%
Return on capital employed – 12.2% 21.3%
Asset turnover 3.0x 2.8x 3.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 1.9x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.2% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHRWUSFDLSTR
Debt / assets – 37.7% 3.8%
Debt / equity – 1.3x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.1x -1.1x
Debt / FCF – 5.7x 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 75.3% 70.2% 54.1%
Equity / assets 24.7% 29.8% 45.9%
Interest coverage – 4.1x 111.1x
Current ratio 1.3x 1.1x 1.8x
Quick ratio – 0.6x 1.7x
Cash ratio – 0.0x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – 4.76 8.93

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHRWUSFDLSTR
Dividend yield 2.0% – 2.6%
Net buyback yield – 4.8% 2.1%
Shareholder yield 2.0% 4.8% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHRWUSFDLSTR
Forward P/E 20.8xFY2026 22.9xFY2026 23.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.12FY2026 $4.49FY2026 $6.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.2%FY2026 +12.8%FY2026 +85.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.0% +18.5% +27.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.98BFY2026 $40.01BFY2026 $5.45BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.9%FY2026 +1.5%FY2026 +15.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.5% +11.9% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHRWUSFDLSTR
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 892 671 544
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.7% +1.6% -2.8%
Institutions buying 445 310 297
Institutions selling 319 275 153
Buyers to sellers 1.39 1.13 1.94

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHRWUSFDLSTR
CHRW 1.00 -0.04 0.66
USFD -0.04 1.00 -0.09
LSTR 0.66 -0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHRW, USFD and LSTR?

US Foods Holding (USFD) is the largest by market capitalisation: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) $14.66B, US Foods Holding (USFD) $22.52B, Landstar System (LSTR) $4.84B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHRW, USFD and LSTR?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 21.9x, US Foods Holding (USFD) 30.9x, Landstar System (LSTR) 30.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is cheapest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 20.8x, US Foods Holding (USFD) 22.9x, Landstar System (LSTR) 23.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Landstar System (LSTR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +10.4%, US Foods Holding (USFD) +3.8%, Landstar System (LSTR) +10.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Landstar System (LSTR) has the highest net margin (US Foods Holding (USFD) 1.8%, Landstar System (LSTR) 3.0%). On return on invested capital, Landstar System (LSTR) leads (US Foods Holding (USFD) 9.9%, Landstar System (LSTR) 17.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year US Foods Holding (USFD) returned the most: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -1.5%, US Foods Holding (USFD) +40.8%, Landstar System (LSTR) +13.6%. Over five years, US Foods Holding (USFD) compounded fastest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +5.6%/yr, US Foods Holding (USFD) +24.3%/yr, Landstar System (LSTR) -4.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, US Foods Holding (USFD) has been the steadiest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 48.4%, US Foods Holding (USFD) 30.1%, Landstar System (LSTR) 40.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHRW, USFD and LSTR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Landstar System (LSTR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.