CHRW vs TLSS vs CPRT Stock Comparison

C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Transportation & Logistics Systems and Copart Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LSTR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CPRT Copart Inc
$31.06 +14.1% 1M -27.8% 1Y
Market cap
$30.96B
P/E
20.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.67B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Copart leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Copart 6, Transportation & Logistics Systems 2, C. H. Robinson Worldwide 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHRWTLSSCPRTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.89B $1.18B $30.96B CPRT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.8x -1,268x 20.9x CPRT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.8x — 18.7x CPRT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.4% — +0.4% CHRW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.7% — 31.8% CPRT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 21.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.7x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -12.3% +1,900.0% -27.8% TLSS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.8%/yr +58.5%/yr -4.4%/yr TLSS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.2% — 33.4% CPRT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 32/100 66/100 CPRT

Percentile Scorecard

CHRWTLSSCPRT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHRWTLSSCPRT
Valuation 26 #102 of 137 7 #128 of 137 23 #106 of 137
Growth 43 #73 of 127 89 #15 of 127 49 #65 of 127
Profitability 49 #64 of 125 – 77 #30 of 125
Financial Health 40 #89 of 147 0 #147 of 147 95 #8 of 147
Shareholder Returns 63 #33 of 87 – 84 #15 of 87
Overall 44 32 66
  • CHRW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • TLSS ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CPRT ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHRWTLSSCPRTSPY
1 month -15.3%+1,900.0%+14.1% -2.0%
3 months -13.7%+1,900.0%+5.6% -2.2%
6 months -20.1%+1,900.0%-6.3% +4.2%
Year to date -17.0%+1,900.0%-20.7% +10.6%
1 year -12.3%+1,900.0%-27.8% +10.4%
3 years +63.4%+1,900.0%-32.4% +73.6%
3 years, per year +17.8%+171.6%-12.2% +20.2%
5 years +39.0%+900.0%-20.0% +61.6%
5 years, per year +6.8%+58.5%-4.4% +10.1%
10 years +93.7%-96.0%+377.4% +261.3%
10 years, per year +6.8%-27.5%+16.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCHRWTLSSCPRTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.2%—33.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.4%—33.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.69—0.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.27—-0.83 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.2%-92.5%-58.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.2%-75.0%-27.8% -3.2%
52-week high $209.42$0.80$43.00 $779.14
52-week low $124.61$0.01$26.27 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHRWTLSSCPRT
P/E now vs peer median 23.7xmedian 15.1x -1,268xmedian 15.1x 19.9xmedian 15.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.0x —median 1.0x 6.2xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.5xmedian 8.2x —median 8.2x 14.2xmedian 8.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 29.8xmedian 12.7x -4,557xmedian 12.7x 22.7xmedian 12.7x
P/B now vs peer median 9.8xmedian 1.2x -55.3xmedian 1.2x 3.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.20median 0.68 -20.71median 0.68 3.01median 0.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHRWTLSSCPRT
Revenue $18.22B – $4.67B
Gross profit $2.86B – $2.70B
Operating income $884.59M -$1.15M $1.65B
Net income $668.81M -$1.06M $1.48B
Free cash flow $519.78M -$258.49K $1.27B
EPS (diluted) $5.58 $0.00 $1.55
Cash & equivalents $193.13M $29.08K $1.91B
Total debt $1.87B $175.00K –
Shares (diluted) 119.75M 5.89B 956.86M
Enterprise value $15.22B $1.18B $15.37B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHRWTLSSCPRT
P/E 23.7x -1,268x 19.9x
P/FCF 29.8x -4,557x 22.7x
P/Operating cash flow 29.0x -4,557x 17.9x
P/S 0.8x – 6.2x
P/B 9.8x -55.3x 3.2x
P/Tangible book 10.0x -55.3x 3.2x
EV/EBITDA 17.5x – 14.2x
EV/EBIT 19.4x -1,027x 16.3x
EV/Revenue 0.9x – 5.8x
EV/FCF 33.0x -4,557x 21.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 32.1x -4,557x 16.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.20 -20.71 3.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHRWTLSSCPRT
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.4% – 0.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.4% – 6.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.9% – -0.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.3% – 4.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.9% 24.9% -2.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.7% 31.0% 3.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.5% -43.9% -4.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 51.8% 6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.9% 73.6% -2.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 61.2% 6.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -39.1% 63.4% -10.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.5% 55.5% 5.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -39.4% 63.4% 3.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.5% 57.1% 14.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHRWTLSSCPRT
Gross margin 15.7% – 57.9%
EBITDA margin 5.4% – 40.5%
Operating margin 4.9% – 35.4%
Pretax margin 4.5% – 39.3%
Net margin 3.7% – 31.8%
FCF margin 2.9% – 27.2%
Operating cash flow margin 2.9% – 34.4%
Return on equity 41.7% – 16.6%
Return on assets 10.9% -4,668% 15.0%
Return on invested capital 21.3% – –
Return on capital employed 29.2% – 18.1%
Asset turnover 3.0x – 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 0.2x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHRWTLSSCPRT
Debt / assets 29.3% 572.2% –
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.7x – –
Debt / FCF 3.6x -0.7x –
Liabilities / assets 75.3% 69,686% 9.3%
Equity / assets 24.7% -69,586% 90.7%
Interest coverage – -57.5x –
Current ratio 1.3x 0.0x 7.9x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.0x 3.9x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x 2.7x
Altman Z-score 6.83 – 21.26

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHRWTLSSCPRT
Dividend yield 1.9% – –
Net buyback yield 4.2% – 4.8%
Shareholder yield 6.0% – 4.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHRWTLSSCPRT
Forward P/E 21.8xFY2026 – 18.7xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $6.12FY2026 $0.00FY2023 $1.66FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +20.2%FY2026 – +7.1%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +19.0% – +3.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.98BFY2026 $31.69MFY2023 $4.64BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +16.9%FY2026 – -0.6%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +1.5% +288.2% +12.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHRWTLSSCPRT
Held by institutions 100.0% – 83.8%
Institutions holding 893 – 1,060
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.7% – +5.7%
Institutions buying 446 – 530
Institutions selling 319 – 396
Buyers to sellers 1.40 – 1.34

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHRWTLSSCPRT
CHRW 1.00 – 0.17
TLSS – – –
CPRT 0.17 – 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHRW, TLSS and CPRT?

Copart (CPRT) is the largest by market capitalisation: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) $15.89B, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) $1.18B, Copart (CPRT) $30.96B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHRW, TLSS and CPRT?

Copart (CPRT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 23.8x, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) -1,268x, Copart (CPRT) 20.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Copart (CPRT) is cheapest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 21.8x, Copart (CPRT) 18.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +10.4%, Copart (CPRT) +0.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Copart (CPRT) has the highest net margin (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 3.7%, Copart (CPRT) 31.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) returned the most: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -12.3%, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) +1,900.0%, Copart (CPRT) -27.8%. Over five years, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) compounded fastest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +6.8%/yr, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) +58.5%/yr, Copart (CPRT) -4.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Copart (CPRT) has been the steadiest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 45.2%, Copart (CPRT) 33.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHRW, TLSS and CPRT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Copart (CPRT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.