CHRW vs MVNC vs LSTR Stock Comparison

C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Marvion and Landstar System Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CPRT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MVNC Marvion Inc.
$0.12 +1,100.0% 1M +300.0% 1Y
Market cap
$46.80M
P/E
110.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.63M
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
4 wins
LSTR Landstar System Inc
$147.53 -15.0% 1M +14.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.06B
P/E
31.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.29B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

C. H. Robinson Worldwide leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (C. H. Robinson Worldwide 5, Marvion 4, Landstar System 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHRWMVNCLSTRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.69B $46.80M $5.06B CHRW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.5x 110.4x 31.6x CHRW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.8x — 24.6x CHRW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.4% +124.8% +10.7% MVNC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.7% 9.9% 3.0% MVNC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 21.3% — 17.9% CHRW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.7x -1.7x -1.1x MVNC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.4% +300.0% +14.9% MVNC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.4%/yr -64.6%/yr -4.1%/yr CHRW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.1% 497.6% 40.2% LSTR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 43/100 35/100 49/100 LSTR

Percentile Scorecard

CHRWMVNCLSTR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHRWMVNCLSTR
Valuation 25 #103 of 137 2 #134 of 137 22 #107 of 137
Growth 42 #73 of 124 84 #21 of 124 24 #95 of 124
Profitability 49 #63 of 122 32 #83 of 122 55 #56 of 122
Financial Health 40 #88 of 147 22 #115 of 147 87 #20 of 147
Shareholder Returns 61 #34 of 85 – 58 #36 of 85
Overall 43 35 49
  • CHRW ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • MVNC ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • LSTR ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHRWMVNCLSTRSPY
1 month -18.4%+1,100.0%-15.0% -2.3%
3 months -12.4%+1,100.0%-16.5% -0.7%
6 months -20.2%+1,100.0%-16.6% +4.8%
Year to date -19.9%+500.0%+2.7% +10.3%
1 year -16.4%+300.0%+14.9% +10.3%
3 years +57.6%-92.0%-13.3% +73.0%
3 years, per year +16.4%-56.9%-4.6% +20.1%
5 years +36.2%-99.4%-18.7% +61.9%
5 years, per year +6.4%-64.6%-4.1% +10.1%
10 years +88.0%-80.0%+105.3% +258.6%
10 years, per year +6.5%-14.9%+7.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCHRWMVNCLSTRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.1%497.6%40.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.4%965.0%46.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.691.190.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.360.600.37 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.2%-100.0%-41.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.5%-60.0%-34.5% -3.5%
52-week high $209.42$0.30$225.37 $779.14
52-week low $124.61$0.01$121.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHRWMVNCLSTR
P/E now vs peer median 22.8xmedian 16.1x 116.7xmedian 16.1x 31.2xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.9x 12.5xmedian 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.1xmedian 8.1x 97.3xmedian 8.1x 18.3xmedian 8.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 29.0xmedian 11.4x -95.4xmedian 11.4x 31.6xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.5xmedian 1.2x -11.1xmedian 1.2x 6.0xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.16median 0.75 3.90median 0.75 -1.81median 0.75

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHRWMVNCLSTR
Revenue $18.22B $3.63M $5.29B
Gross profit $2.86B $1.68M –
Operating income $884.59M $266.11K $214.56M
Net income $668.81M $415.72K $160.38M
Free cash flow $519.78M $32.24K $157.62M
EPS (diluted) $5.58 $0.00 $4.73
Cash & equivalents $193.13M $727.30K $297.32M
Total debt $1.87B $2.75M $68.71M
Shares (diluted) 119.75M 382.34M 33.87M
Enterprise value $15.02B $44.65M $3.50B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHRWMVNCLSTR
P/E 22.8x 116.7x 31.2x
P/FCF 29.0x -95.4x 31.6x
P/Operating cash flow 28.2x 98.7x 29.0x
P/S 0.8x 12.5x 0.9x
P/B 9.5x -11.1x 6.0x
P/Tangible book 9.8x -11.1x 6.0x
EV/EBITDA 17.1x 97.3x 18.3x
EV/EBIT 18.9x 205.3x 21.9x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 12.3x 0.9x
EV/FCF 32.2x -93.8x 29.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 31.4x 97.0x 27.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.16 3.90 -1.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHRWMVNCLSTR
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.4% 124.8% 10.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.4% -32.9% -2.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.9% 100.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.3% -18.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.9% 133.9% 19.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.7% 26.4% -18.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.5% 147.0% 16.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 26.7% -18.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.9% 127.2% 19.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.7% 29.9% -17.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -39.1% 345.8% -19.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.5% 33.4% -29.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -39.4% 32.9% -20.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.5% 27.3% -30.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHRWMVNCLSTR
Gross margin 15.7% 44.1% –
EBITDA margin 5.4% 12.7% 4.8%
Operating margin 4.9% 6.0% 4.1%
Pretax margin 4.5% 9.8% 4.0%
Net margin 3.7% 9.9% 3.0%
FCF margin 2.9% -13.1% 3.0%
Operating cash flow margin 2.9% 12.7% 3.2%
Return on equity 41.7% – 19.2%
Return on assets 10.9% 6.4% 9.0%
Return on invested capital 21.3% – 17.9%
Return on capital employed 29.2% – 21.3%
Asset turnover 3.0x 0.6x 3.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 1.3x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHRWMVNCLSTR
Debt / assets 29.3% 0.0% 3.8%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.0x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.7x -1.7x -1.1x
Debt / FCF 3.6x 0.0x 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 75.3% 167.3% 54.1%
Equity / assets 24.7% -67.3% 45.9%
Interest coverage – 1.0x 111.1x
Current ratio 1.3x 0.2x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.2x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 6.78 1.16 9.05

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHRWMVNCLSTR
Dividend yield 2.0% – 2.5%
Net buyback yield 4.3% – 2.0%
Shareholder yield 6.2% – 4.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHRWMVNCLSTR
Forward P/E 21.8xFY2026 – 24.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.12FY2026 – $6.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.2%FY2026 – +85.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.0% – +27.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.98BFY2026 – $5.45BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.9%FY2026 – +15.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.5% – +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHRWMVNCLSTR
Held by institutions 100.0% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 893 – 544
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.7% – -2.8%
Institutions buying 446 – 297
Institutions selling 319 – 153
Buyers to sellers 1.40 – 1.94

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHRWMVNCLSTR
CHRW 1.00 -0.02 0.66
MVNC -0.02 1.00 -0.05
LSTR 0.66 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHRW, MVNC and LSTR?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is the largest by market capitalisation: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) $15.69B, Marvion (MVNC) $46.80M, Landstar System (LSTR) $5.06B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHRW, MVNC and LSTR?

C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 23.5x, Marvion (MVNC) 110.4x, Landstar System (LSTR) 31.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) is cheapest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 21.8x, Landstar System (LSTR) 24.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Marvion (MVNC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +10.4%, Marvion (MVNC) +124.8%, Landstar System (LSTR) +10.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Marvion (MVNC) has the highest net margin (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 3.7%, Marvion (MVNC) 9.9%, Landstar System (LSTR) 3.0%). On return on invested capital, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) leads (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 21.3%, Landstar System (LSTR) 17.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marvion (MVNC) returned the most: C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) -16.4%, Marvion (MVNC) +300.0%, Landstar System (LSTR) +14.9%. Over five years, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) compounded fastest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) +6.4%/yr, Marvion (MVNC) -64.6%/yr, Landstar System (LSTR) -4.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Landstar System (LSTR) has been the steadiest (C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) 45.1%, Marvion (MVNC) 497.6%, Landstar System (LSTR) 40.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHRW, MVNC and LSTR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, C. H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.