CHA vs SBUX vs DPZ Stock Comparison

Chagee Holdings, Starbucks and Dominos Pizza Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CAVA) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CHA Chagee Holdings Ltd.
$11.69 +2.1% 1M -29.4% 1Y
Market cap
$1.95B
P/E
14.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.84B
Div. yield
–
Quick-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
SBUX Starbucks Corp
$103.20 +8.3% 1M +20.8% 1Y
Market cap
$120.14B
P/E
60.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$38.34B
Div. yield
–
Quick-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
DPZ Dominos Pizza Inc
$309.45 +5.9% 1M -24.7% 1Y
Market cap
$10.34B
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.07B
Div. yield
–
Quick-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Starbucks leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Starbucks 5, Chagee Holdings 3, Dominos Pizza 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHASBUXDPZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.95B $120.14B $10.34B SBUX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.3x 60.6x 17.0x CHA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.0x 42.0x 17.4x CHA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.5% +4.5% +4.5% DPZ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.4% 5.2% 12.0% DPZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 31.4% 85.1% DPZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x 4.3x SBUX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -29.4% +20.8% -24.7% SBUX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -0.5%/yr -8.7%/yr SBUX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.6% 27.5% 32.2% SBUX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 36/100 53/100 CHA

Percentile Scorecard

CHASBUXDPZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHASBUXDPZ
Valuation 92 #5 of 50 6 #47 of 50 47 #27 of 50
Growth 4 #45 of 47 17 #39 of 47 35 #31 of 47
Profitability 71 #14 of 46 78 #11 of 46 91 #5 of 46
Financial Health 98 #2 of 51 42 #30 of 51 14 #44 of 51
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 32 36 #21 of 32 81 #7 of 32
Overall 73 36 53
  • CHA ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • SBUX ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • DPZ ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHASBUXDPZSPY
1 month +2.1%+8.3%+5.9% +0.9%
3 months +3.4%-0.9%-14.0% +5.9%
6 months +9.5%-2.2%-6.9% +8.5%
Year to date +0.5%+22.6%-25.8% +13.3%
1 year -29.4%+20.8%-24.7% +12.4%
3 years —+12.1%-9.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year —+3.9%-3.1% +23.5%
5 years —-2.7%-36.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year —-0.5%-8.7% +11.0%
10 years —+92.8%+84.3% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+6.8%+6.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCHASBUXDPZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.6%27.5%32.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.9%24.9%33.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.250.540.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.560.76-0.77 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.3%-40.2%-49.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.4%-4.9%-29.4% -0.9%
52-week high $16.55$108.55$438.42 $779.14
52-week low $9.16$79.60$283.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHASBUXDPZ
P/E now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 20.8x 59.3xmedian 20.8x 16.8xmedian 20.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.1x 3.1xmedian 1.1x 2.0xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.0x 27.4xmedian 13.0x 13.5xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 17.6x 32.3xmedian 17.6x 16.0xmedian 17.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 3.2x -15.3xmedian 3.2x -2.6xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.08 -3.09median 1.08 2.17median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHASBUXDPZ
Revenue $1.84B $38.34B $5.07B
Gross profit – – $2.03B
Operating income $151.10M $2.98B $999.84M
Net income $140.02M $1.98B $609.38M
Free cash flow $233.21M $3.64B $635.69M
EPS (diluted) $0.83 $1.73 $18.40
Cash & equivalents $963.92M $3.45B $229.04M
Total debt – $13.28B $4.89B
Shares (diluted) 164.71M 1.14B 33.11M
Enterprise value -$2.76B $107.76B $9.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHASBUXDPZ
P/E 13.9x 59.3x 16.8x
P/FCF 9.6x 32.3x 16.0x
P/Operating cash flow 9.6x 23.6x 13.4x
P/S 1.2x 3.1x 2.0x
P/B 1.8x -15.3x -2.6x
P/Tangible book 1.8x -15.0x -2.6x
EV/EBITDA – 27.4x 13.5x
EV/EBIT 7.2x 42.8x 14.8x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 3.3x 2.9x
EV/FCF 4.7x 35.0x 23.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.7x 25.5x 19.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -3.09 2.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHASBUXDPZ
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.5% 4.5% 4.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 3.1% 4.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 5.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 6.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -54.0% -24.9% 7.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -17.8% 2.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -50.7% -24.7% 3.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -19.4% 5.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -68.9% -24.9% 6.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -19.2% 7.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -27.1% 1.7% 4.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -1.2% 10.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -27.1% 61.6% 0.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 6.9% 10.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHASBUXDPZ
Gross margin – – 40.0%
EBITDA margin – 12.1% 21.6%
Operating margin 8.2% 7.8% 19.7%
Pretax margin 10.6% 8.0% 15.4%
Net margin 7.4% 5.2% 12.0%
FCF margin 12.6% 9.5% 12.5%
Operating cash flow margin 12.6% 13.0% 15.0%
Return on equity 12.0% – –
Return on assets 8.1% 6.7% 34.5%
Return on invested capital – 31.4% 85.1%
Return on capital employed 11.5% 15.3% –
Asset turnover 1.1x 1.3x 2.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 2.5x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.0% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHASBUXDPZ
Debt / assets 1.5% 46.9% 276.6%
Debt / equity 0.0x -1.7x -1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x 4.3x
Debt / FCF 0.1x 3.6x 7.7x
Liabilities / assets 30.8% 127.1% 323.9%
Equity / assets 69.2% -27.1% -223.9%
Interest coverage – 5.4x 5.0x
Current ratio 3.4x 0.8x 0.5x
Quick ratio 3.0x 0.5x 0.3x
Cash ratio 2.9x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 4.90 3.14 2.02

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHASBUXDPZ
Dividend yield 7.9% 2.4% 2.5%
Net buyback yield – -0.1% 3.7%
Shareholder yield 7.9% 2.3% 6.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHASBUXDPZ
Forward P/E 8.0xFY2026 42.0xFY2026 17.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.47FY2026 $2.46FY2026 $17.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +67.0%FY2026 +15.5%FY2026 +1.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.9% +21.5% +10.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.22BFY2026 $35.66BFY2026 $5.29BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.1%FY2026 -4.1%FY2026 +7.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.4% +5.4% +3.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHASBUXDPZ
Held by institutions 8.9% 85.6% 100.0%
Institutions holding 47 2,401 733
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.3% +4.9% +2.4%
Institutions buying 28 1,098 381
Institutions selling 15 991 288
Buyers to sellers 1.87 1.11 1.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHASBUXDPZ
CHA 1.00 0.03 0.19
SBUX 0.03 1.00 0.24
DPZ 0.19 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHA, SBUX and DPZ?

Starbucks (SBUX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Chagee Holdings (CHA) $1.95B, Starbucks (SBUX) $120.14B, Dominos Pizza (DPZ) $10.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHA, SBUX and DPZ?

Chagee Holdings (CHA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Chagee Holdings (CHA) 14.3x, Starbucks (SBUX) 60.6x, Dominos Pizza (DPZ) 17.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Chagee Holdings (CHA) is cheapest (Chagee Holdings (CHA) 8.0x, Starbucks (SBUX) 42.0x, Dominos Pizza (DPZ) 17.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Dominos Pizza (DPZ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Chagee Holdings (CHA) -2.5%, Starbucks (SBUX) +4.5%, Dominos Pizza (DPZ) +4.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Dominos Pizza (DPZ) has the highest net margin (Chagee Holdings (CHA) 7.4%, Starbucks (SBUX) 5.2%, Dominos Pizza (DPZ) 12.0%). On return on invested capital, Dominos Pizza (DPZ) leads (Starbucks (SBUX) 31.4%, Dominos Pizza (DPZ) 85.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Starbucks (SBUX) returned the most: Chagee Holdings (CHA) -29.4%, Starbucks (SBUX) +20.8%, Dominos Pizza (DPZ) -24.7%. Over five years, Starbucks (SBUX) compounded fastest (Starbucks (SBUX) -0.5%/yr, Dominos Pizza (DPZ) -8.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Starbucks (SBUX) has been the steadiest (Chagee Holdings (CHA) 52.6%, Starbucks (SBUX) 27.5%, Dominos Pizza (DPZ) 32.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHA, SBUX and DPZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Starbucks (SBUX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.