CHA vs CMG vs YUMC Stock Comparison

Chagee Holdings, Chipotle Mexican Grill and Yum China Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CHA Chagee Holdings Ltd.
$12.25 +7.4% 1M -28.5% 1Y
Market cap
$2.34B
P/E
14.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.84B
Div. yield
7.51%
Quick-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc
$27.98 -10.7% 1M -31.9% 1Y
Market cap
$35.41B
P/E
25.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.42B
Div. yield
–
Quick-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.
$45.41 +12.2% 1M +2.2% 1Y
Market cap
$15.67B
P/E
16.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.44B
Div. yield
2.44%
Quick-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Yum China Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Yum China Holdings 4, Chipotle Mexican Grill 3, Chagee Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHACMGYUMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.34B $35.41B $15.67B CMG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.5x 25.2x 16.2x CHA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.3x 26.1x 14.9x CHA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.5% +7.3% +8.8% YUMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.4% 11.4% 7.8% CMG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 16.5% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -0.7x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 7.51% — 2.44% CHA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -28.5% -31.9% +2.2% YUMC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -4.7%/yr -4.7%/yr CMG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.5% 44.8% 25.5% YUMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 64/100 75/100 YUMC

Percentile Scorecard

CHACMGYUMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHACMGYUMC
Valuation 84 #9 of 50 25 #38 of 50 78 #12 of 50
Growth 4 #45 of 47 41 #28 of 47 50 #24 of 47
Profitability 71 #14 of 46 91 #5 of 46 64 #17 of 46
Financial Health 98 #2 of 51 64 #19 of 51 88 #7 of 51
Shareholder Returns 97 #2 of 33 100 #1 of 33 94 #3 of 33
Overall 71 64 75
  • CHA ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • CMG ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • YUMC ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHACMGYUMCSPY
1 month +7.4%-10.7%+12.2% -0.2%
3 months +5.2%-16.5%-0.3% +3.9%
6 months +12.1%-14.9%-4.1% +8.2%
Year to date +5.3%-24.4%-4.9% +12.9%
1 year -28.5%-31.9%+2.2% +12.3%
3 years —-25.9%-13.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-9.5%-4.7% +23.3%
5 years —-21.3%-21.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-4.7%-4.7% +10.9%
10 years —+279.6%+82.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+14.3%+6.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCHACMGYUMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.5%44.8%25.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.7%50.3%24.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.250.610.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.54-0.710.09 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.3%-59.9%-54.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.5%-31.9%-21.6% -1.2%
52-week high $17.13$41.06$57.95 $779.14
52-week low $9.16$27.51$39.98 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHACMGYUMC
P/E now vs peer median 14.5xmedian 20.6x 25.2xmedian 20.6x 16.2xmedian 20.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.2x 2.8xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.3x 15.8xmedian 13.3x 7.8xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 17.3x 22.6xmedian 17.3x 16.7xmedian 17.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 3.1x 16.1xmedian 3.1x 2.6xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.07 2.21median 1.07 0.98median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHACMGYUMC
Revenue $1.84B $12.42B $12.44B
Gross profit – – $2.14B
Operating income $151.10M $1.82B $1.38B
Net income $140.02M $1.42B $1.05B
Free cash flow $233.21M $1.57B $940.00M
EPS (diluted) $0.83 $1.11 $2.79
Cash & equivalents $963.92M $228.20M $485.00M
Total debt – – $66.00M
Shares (diluted) 164.71M 1.28B 349.00M
Enterprise value -$2.35B $31.39B $10.03B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHACMGYUMC
P/E 14.5x 25.2x 16.2x
P/FCF 10.0x 22.6x 16.7x
P/Operating cash flow 10.0x 15.2x 9.9x
P/S 1.3x 2.8x 1.3x
P/B 1.9x 16.1x 2.6x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 16.1x 2.7x
EV/EBITDA – 15.8x 7.8x
EV/EBIT 7.9x 19.1x 10.4x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 2.8x 1.2x
EV/FCF 5.1x 22.1x 15.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.1x 14.9x 9.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.21 0.98

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHACMGYUMC
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.5% 7.3% 8.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.2% 6.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 9.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 5.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -54.0% -5.6% 12.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 8.3% 10.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -50.7% -7.9% 6.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 8.4% 9.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -68.9% -2.8% 13.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 11.4% 16.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -27.1% 11.3% 9.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.1% -3.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -27.1% 7.0% 12.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 7.8% -4.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHACMGYUMC
Gross margin – – 17.2%
EBITDA margin – 17.7% 14.9%
Operating margin 8.2% 14.7% 11.1%
Pretax margin 10.6% 15.0% 11.5%
Net margin 7.4% 11.4% 7.8%
FCF margin 12.6% 12.6% 7.6%
Operating cash flow margin 12.6% 18.7% 12.7%
Return on equity 12.0% 61.6% 17.3%
Return on assets 8.1% 16.1% 9.7%
Return on invested capital – – 16.5%
Return on capital employed 11.5% 24.2% 16.4%
Asset turnover 1.1x 1.4x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.6x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHACMGYUMC
Debt / assets 1.5% – 0.6%
Debt / equity 0.0x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -0.7x
Debt / FCF 0.1x – 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 30.8% 75.2% 44.2%
Equity / assets 69.2% 24.8% 55.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 3.4x 0.7x 1.0x
Quick ratio 3.0x 0.6x 0.6x
Cash ratio 2.9x 0.5x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 5.02 5.21 3.73

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHACMGYUMC
Dividend yield 7.5% – 2.4%
Net buyback yield – 7.9% 8.3%
Shareholder yield 7.5% 7.9% 10.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 35.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 40.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 24.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 21.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHACMGYUMC
Forward P/E 8.3xFY2026 26.1xFY2026 14.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.47FY2026 $1.07FY2026 $3.04FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +67.0%FY2026 -8.5%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.9% +19.6% +15.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.22BFY2026 $13.54BFY2026 $12.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.1%FY2026 +13.5%FY2026 +4.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.4% +9.7% +6.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHACMGYUMC
Held by institutions 8.9% 89.5% 66.8%
Institutions holding 47 1,197 660
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.3% +0.3% +1.4%
Institutions buying 28 510 261
Institutions selling 15 527 231
Buyers to sellers 1.87 0.97 1.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHACMGYUMC
CHA 1.00 0.16 0.13
CMG 0.16 1.00 0.26
YUMC 0.13 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHA, CMG and YUMC?

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Chagee Holdings (CHA) $2.34B, Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) $35.41B, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) $15.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHA, CMG and YUMC?

Chagee Holdings (CHA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Chagee Holdings (CHA) 14.5x, Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) 25.2x, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) 16.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Chagee Holdings (CHA) is cheapest (Chagee Holdings (CHA) 8.3x, Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) 26.1x, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) 14.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Yum China Holdings (YUMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Chagee Holdings (CHA) -2.5%, Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) +7.3%, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) +8.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) has the highest net margin (Chagee Holdings (CHA) 7.4%, Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) 11.4%, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) 7.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Yum China Holdings (YUMC) returned the most: Chagee Holdings (CHA) -28.5%, Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) -31.9%, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) +2.2%. Over five years, Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) compounded fastest (Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) -4.7%/yr, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) -4.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Chagee Holdings (CHA) has the highest dividend yield: Chagee Holdings (CHA) 7.51%, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) 2.44%. Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) has been the steadiest (Chagee Holdings (CHA) 52.5%, Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) 44.8%, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) 25.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHA, CMG and YUMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.