CFG vs UWMC vs RF Stock Comparison

Citizens Financial, UWM Holdings and Regions Financial Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KEY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.51 +20.8% 1M -74.1% 1Y
Market cap
$511.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.41 +4.3% 1M +17.1% 1Y
Market cap
$24.62B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Regions Financial leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Regions Financial 7, Citizens Financial 3, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCFGUWMCRFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.66B $511.35M $24.62B CFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.0x -13.8x 11.4x RF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.0x 7.9x 10.1x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.6% +26.1% +4.4% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 23.8% -1.0% 28.2% RF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.0% 6.3% 14.6% RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x 10.6x 1.6x RF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.04% RF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.2% -74.1% +17.1% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.6%/yr -26.0%/yr +3.7%/yr CFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.2% 80.2% 23.3% RF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 30/100 35/100 39/100 RF

Percentile Scorecard

CFGUWMCRF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCFGUWMCRF
Valuation 19 #293 of 361 20 #136 of 169 22 #281 of 361
Growth 19 #139 of 172 16 #137 of 162 9 #157 of 172
Profitability 28 #108 of 149 30 #105 of 149 47 #80 of 149
Financial Health 29 #113 of 158 17 #132 of 158 54 #74 of 158
Shareholder Returns 54 #157 of 338 94 #9 of 136 64 #122 of 338
Overall 30 35 39
  • CFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCFGUWMCRFSPY
1 month +0.8%+20.8%+4.3% +0.9%
3 months -8.5%-24.1%-8.1% +5.9%
6 months +1.4%-56.5%+1.4% +8.5%
Year to date +11.8%-65.5%+4.8% +13.3%
1 year +27.2%-74.1%+17.1% +12.4%
3 years +185.5%-69.7%+102.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year +41.9%-32.9%+26.6% +23.5%
5 years +37.8%-77.8%+20.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year +6.6%-26.0%+3.7% +11.0%
10 years +147.8%—+166.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year +9.5%—+10.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCFGUWMCRFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.2%80.2%23.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.4%89.8%25.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.871.470.65 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.08-0.920.73 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.4%-89.5%-44.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.6%-75.2%-12.3% -0.9%
52-week high $74.73$6.10$32.40 $779.14
52-week low $49.71$1.00$24.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCFGUWMCRF
P/E now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 12.1x -13.7xmedian 11.4x 11.3xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 3.2xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 5.1x 15.2xmedian 11.3x 6.5xmedian 5.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.2xmedian 10.8x -0.5xmedian 6.9x 14.5xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 2.5xmedian 0.7x 1.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.02median 1.32 0.27median 0.34 5.17median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCFGUWMCRF
Revenue $8.93B $3.58B $7.62B
Net income $2.27B -$104.96M $2.23B
Free cash flow $1.09B -$4.92B $1.67B
EPS (diluted) $4.99 $-0.11 $2.51
Cash & equivalents – $498.41M –
Total debt $17.83B $19.23B $7.63B
Shares (diluted) 425.66M 337.53M 857.00M
Enterprise value $27.66B -$1.79B $24.62B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCFGUWMCRF
P/E 12.9x -13.7x 11.3x
P/FCF 25.2x -0.5x 14.5x
P/Operating cash flow 21.9x -0.5x 13.6x
P/S 3.1x 0.7x 3.2x
P/B 1.1x 2.5x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 1.1x -0.6x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA 6.5x 15.2x 6.5x
EV/EBIT 7.0x 17.1x 6.6x
EV/Revenue 5.1x 2.2x 4.2x
EV/FCF 41.5x -1.6x 19.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 36.0x -1.6x 17.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.02 0.27 5.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCFGUWMCRF
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.6% 26.1% 4.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.9% 27.3% -0.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 33.1% -175.0% 7.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.1% -31.9% -1.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 38.9% -287.6% 15.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.4% -51.2% 2.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -55.9% -103.1% -33.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.4% -18.2% -6.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -59.8% -100.4% -30.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.9% -18.4% -6.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCFGUWMCRF
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 77.7% 14.6% 64.2%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 32.3% -3.2% 37.4%
Net margin 23.8% -1.0% 28.2%
FCF margin 12.2% -137.6% 21.9%
Operating cash flow margin 14.1% -135.9% 23.3%
Return on equity 8.8% -8.1% 11.8%
Return on assets 1.0% -0.6% 1.4%
Return on invested capital 12.0% 6.3% 14.6%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x 46.3x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 1.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCFGUWMCRF
Debt / assets 7.6% 33.5% 4.7%
Debt / equity 0.7x 6.1x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x 10.6x 1.6x
Debt / FCF 16.3x -1.2x 4.6x
Liabilities / assets 89.3% 94.5% 88.3%
Equity / assets 10.7% 5.5% 11.7%
Interest coverage 1.8x 0.8x 2.5x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCFGUWMCRF
Dividend yield 2.8% 19.9% 3.9%
Net buyback yield 4.3% – 4.7%
Shareholder yield 7.1% 19.9% 8.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 35.0% – 41.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) 72.6% – 55.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.7% – 1.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -1.1% – 8.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCFGUWMCRF
Forward P/E 12.0xFY2026 7.9xFY2026 10.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.42FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $2.80FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +40.4%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026 +20.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.1% +26.3% -4.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.59BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026 $7.33BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026 -3.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.4% +37.3% +16.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCFGUWMCRF
Held by institutions 96.7% 17.0% 84.8%
Institutions holding 1,097 290 1,105
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +31.8% +2.9%
Institutions buying 633 213 559
Institutions selling 314 50 347
Buyers to sellers 2.02 4.26 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CFGUWMCRF
CFG 1.00 0.24 0.88
UWMC 0.24 1.00 0.23
RF 0.88 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CFG, UWMC and RF?

Citizens Financial (CFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.66B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $511.35M, Regions Financial (RF) $24.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, CFG, UWMC and RF?

Regions Financial (RF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Citizens Financial (CFG) 13.0x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -13.8x, Regions Financial (RF) 11.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 7.9x, Regions Financial (RF) 10.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Citizens Financial (CFG) +10.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest net margin (Citizens Financial (CFG) 23.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: Citizens Financial (CFG) +27.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -74.1%, Regions Financial (RF) +17.1%. Over five years, Citizens Financial (CFG) compounded fastest (Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.6%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.0%/yr, Regions Financial (RF) +3.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest dividend yield: Citizens Financial (CFG) 0.03%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%, Regions Financial (RF) 0.04%. UWM Holdings (UWMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Regions Financial (RF) has been the steadiest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.2%, Regions Financial (RF) 23.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CFG, UWMC and RF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Regions Financial (RF) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.