CFG vs UWMC vs HBAN Stock Comparison

Citizens Financial, UWM Holdings and Huntington Bancshares Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.58 +24.4% 1M -71.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.53B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
18.99%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Citizens Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Citizens Financial 6, Huntington Bancshares 4, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCFGUWMCHBANLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $27.35B $2.53B $32.27B HBAN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.9x -14.4x 13.9x CFG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.0x 8.3x 12.7x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.6% +26.1% +30.6% HBAN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 23.8% -1.0% 22.4% CFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.0% 6.3% 11.9% CFG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x 10.6x 2.5x HBAN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.93% 18.99% 3.78% UWMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.6% -71.9% +3.7% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.0%/yr -26.3%/yr -0.2%/yr CFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.6% 80.5% 26.0% CFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 23/100 35/100 36/100 HBAN

Percentile Scorecard

CFGUWMCHBAN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCFGUWMCHBAN
Valuation 20 #287 of 359 18 #139 of 169 39 #218 of 359
Growth 14 #294 of 340 17 #137 of 164 32 #232 of 340
Profitability 15 #292 of 343 28 #111 of 154 27 #251 of 343
Financial Health 19 #273 of 338 17 #135 of 163 22 #265 of 338
Shareholder Returns 48 #183 of 351 93 #10 of 137 62 #134 of 351
Overall 23 35 36
  • CFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • HBAN ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCFGUWMCHBANSPY
1 month +0.9%+24.4%+4.4% -2.3%
3 months -10.7%-18.1%-7.8% -0.7%
6 months +2.2%-55.4%-0.9% +4.8%
Year to date +11.2%-63.9%-7.7% +10.3%
1 year +27.6%-71.9%+3.7% +10.3%
3 years +148.1%-70.8%+50.8% +73.0%
3 years, per year +35.4%-33.7%+14.7% +20.1%
5 years +34.0%-78.2%-1.2% +61.9%
5 years, per year +6.0%-26.3%-0.2% +10.1%
10 years +148.8%—+55.0% +258.6%
10 years, per year +9.5%—+4.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCFGUWMCHBANSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.6%80.5%26.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.9%90.1%28.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.891.360.78 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.08-0.890.14 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.4%-89.5%-47.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.1%-74.1%-16.9% -3.5%
52-week high $74.73$6.10$19.27 $779.14
52-week low $49.71$1.00$15.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCFGUWMCHBAN
P/E now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 12.7x -14.4xmedian 11.6x 13.9xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 3.5x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 3.1xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 4.9x 15.4xmedian 13.1x 6.2xmedian 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.0xmedian 11.4x -0.5xmedian 6.0x 11.1xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.2x 2.6xmedian 0.7x 1.0xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.01median 1.46 0.28median 0.34 -1.53median 1.46

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCFGUWMCHBAN
Revenue $8.93B $3.58B $10.38B
Net income $2.27B -$104.96M $2.51B
Free cash flow $1.09B -$4.92B $2.92B
EPS (diluted) $4.99 $-0.11 $1.14
Cash & equivalents – $498.41M –
Total debt $17.83B $6.02B $23.41B
Shares (diluted) 425.66M 337.53M 2.05B
Enterprise value $27.35B $1.09B $27.21B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCFGUWMCHBAN
P/E 12.9x -14.4x 13.9x
P/FCF 25.0x -0.5x 11.1x
P/Operating cash flow 21.7x -0.5x 9.6x
P/S 3.1x 0.7x 3.1x
P/B 1.1x 2.6x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 1.1x -0.6x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 6.5x 15.4x 6.2x
EV/EBIT 6.9x 17.4x 6.8x
EV/Revenue 5.1x 2.3x 5.2x
EV/FCF 41.3x -1.6x 18.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 35.9x -1.7x 16.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.01 0.28 -1.53

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCFGUWMCHBAN
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.6% 26.1% 30.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.9% 27.3% 10.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 33.1% -175.0% 11.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.1% -31.9% 1.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 38.9% -287.6% -20.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.4% -51.2% -9.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -55.9% -103.1% 25.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -30.4% -18.2% 2.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -59.8% -100.4% 17.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.9% -18.4% -0.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCFGUWMCHBAN
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 77.7% 14.6% 84.1%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 32.3% -3.2% 29.5%
Net margin 23.8% -1.0% 22.4%
FCF margin 12.2% -137.6% 28.1%
Operating cash flow margin 14.1% -135.9% 32.3%
Return on equity 8.8% -8.1% 7.7%
Return on assets 1.0% -0.6% 0.9%
Return on invested capital 12.0% 6.3% 11.9%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.6x 46.3x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.5% 1.6% 1.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCFGUWMCHBAN
Debt / assets 7.6% 33.5% 8.1%
Debt / equity 0.7x 6.1x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x 10.6x 2.5x
Debt / FCF 16.3x -1.2x 8.0x
Liabilities / assets 89.3% 94.5% 88.8%
Equity / assets 10.7% 5.5% 11.2%
Interest coverage 1.8x 0.8x 1.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCFGUWMCHBAN
Dividend yield 2.9% 19.0% 3.8%
Net buyback yield 4.3% – 1.3%
Shareholder yield 7.2% 19.0% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 35.0% – 44.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) 72.6% – 37.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.7% – 22.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -1.1% – 7.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCFGUWMCHBAN
Forward P/E 12.0xFY2026 8.3xFY2026 12.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.42FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $1.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +40.4%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026 -9.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.1% +26.3% +48.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.59BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026 $10.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026 +26.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.4% +37.3% +12.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCFGUWMCHBAN
Held by institutions 96.7% 17.0% 86.7%
Institutions holding 1,099 291 1,152
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +31.8% +1.4%
Institutions buying 634 214 575
Institutions selling 315 50 381
Buyers to sellers 2.01 4.28 1.51

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CFGUWMCHBAN
CFG 1.00 0.22 0.82
UWMC 0.22 1.00 0.20
HBAN 0.82 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CFG, UWMC and HBAN?

Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.35B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.53B, Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) $32.27B.

Which stock is cheaper, CFG, UWMC and HBAN?

Citizens Financial (CFG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.9x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -14.4x, Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) 13.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 8.3x, Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) 12.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Citizens Financial (CFG) +10.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) +30.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Citizens Financial (CFG) has the highest net margin (Citizens Financial (CFG) 23.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) 22.4%). On return on invested capital, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) 11.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: Citizens Financial (CFG) +27.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -71.9%, Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) +3.7%. Over five years, Citizens Financial (CFG) compounded fastest (Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.0%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.3%/yr, Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) -0.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) has the highest dividend yield: Citizens Financial (CFG) 2.93%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 18.99%, Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) 3.78%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Citizens Financial (CFG) has been the steadiest (Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.5%, Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) 26.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CFG, UWMC and HBAN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.