CF vs GRO vs SSL Stock Comparison

CF Industries Holdings, Brazil Potash and Sasol Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MOS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRO Brazil Potash Corp.
$1.86 -21.2% 1M -27.3% 1Y
Market cap
$99.87M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Fertilizers Basic Materials
SSL Sasol Ltd
$17.14 +22.2% 1M +167.4% 1Y
Market cap
$11.21B
P/E
15.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
2 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

CF Industries Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (CF Industries Holdings 5, Sasol 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCFGROSSLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $18.24B $99.87M $11.21B CF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.8x -0.9x 15.0x CF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.5x — 5.3x SSL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.0% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 27.1% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 21.7% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.74% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +39.5% -27.3% +167.4% SSL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.9%/yr — +0.2%/yr CF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.6% 79.1% 54.0% CF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 84/100 33/100 — CF

Percentile Scorecard

CFGROSSL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCFGROSSL
Valuation 83 #17 of 94 13 #82 of 94 95 #6 of 99
Growth 71 #27 of 91 53 #43 of 91 –
Profitability 99 #2 of 86 6 #81 of 86 –
Financial Health 92 #9 of 95 94 #7 of 95 50 #52 of 102
Shareholder Returns 77 #17 of 70 0 #70 of 70 –
Overall 84 33 –
  • CF ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • GRO ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • SSL ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCFGROSSLSPY
1 month +5.1%-21.2%+22.2% -0.2%
3 months -2.0%-9.3%+56.2% +3.9%
6 months -1.5%-41.0%+30.8% +8.2%
Year to date +55.8%-1.6%+163.3% +12.9%
1 year +39.5%-27.3%+167.4% +12.3%
3 years +50.9%—+30.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year +14.7%—+9.4% +23.3%
5 years +109.4%—+1.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year +15.9%—+0.2% +10.9%
10 years +391.4%—-37.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year +17.3%—-4.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCFGROSSLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.6%79.1%54.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.0%79.2%55.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.071.58-0.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.93-0.353.10 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.1%-90.5%-89.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.5%-52.2%-4.9% -1.2%
52-week high $139.27$3.89$18.02 $779.14
52-week low $76.09$1.69$6.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCFGROSSL
P/E now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 22.0x -0.9xmedian 22.0x 15.0xmedian 13.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x 0.7xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 12.4x —median 12.4x —median 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 15.1x -4.0xmedian 15.1x 3.5xmedian 11.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.6x 0.5xmedian 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 2.38median 1.66 —median 1.66 —median 2.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCFGROSSL
Revenue $7.74B – –
Gross profit $3.29B – –
Operating income $3.18B -$95.57M –
Net income $2.50B -$28.15M –
Free cash flow $1.91B -$24.85M –
EPS (diluted) $13.64 $-2.04 –
Cash & equivalents $2.48B $75.71M $2.64B
Total debt $3.22B – $6.66B
Shares (diluted) 153.90M 42.49M 642.00M
Enterprise value $13.07B -$35.44M $574.22M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCFGROSSL
P/E 8.8x -0.9x 15.0x
P/FCF 9.6x -4.0x 3.5x
P/Operating cash flow 6.1x -7.9x –
P/S 2.4x – 0.7x
P/B 2.0x 0.5x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 0.5x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 4.7x – –
EV/EBIT 6.0x -0.3x –
EV/Revenue 2.5x – –
EV/FCF 9.9x -1.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 6.4x -1.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.38 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCFGROSSL
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.0% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.9% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 43.3% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -5.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 66.7% -3.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -3.3% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 58.6% 57.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -3.7% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 70.9% 27.7% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.7% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.1% 20.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 6.9% -1.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -11.4% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCFGROSSL
Gross margin 42.5% – –
EBITDA margin 52.6% – –
Operating margin 41.1% – –
Pretax margin 40.1% – –
Net margin 27.1% – –
FCF margin 24.7% – –
Operating cash flow margin 38.5% – –
Return on equity 29.1% -47.7% –
Return on assets 16.8% -43.5% –
Return on invested capital 21.7% – –
Return on capital employed 22.6% -48.5% –
Asset turnover 0.5x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCFGROSSL
Debt / assets 21.3% – 30.1%
Debt / equity 0.4x – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x – –
Debt / FCF 1.7x – –
Liabilities / assets 40.9% 5.4% 53.3%
Equity / assets 59.1% 94.6% 46.7%
Interest coverage 18.6x -94.7x –
Current ratio 4.9x 42.2x 1.8x
Quick ratio 4.1x 41.9x 1.2x
Cash ratio 3.2x 41.8x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 3.66 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCFGROSSL
Dividend yield 1.7% – –
Net buyback yield 5.2% -63.3% –
Shareholder yield 7.0% -63.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 12.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 16.4% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -8.5% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -0.3% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCFGROSSL
Forward P/E 8.5xFY2026 – 5.3xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $14.21FY2026 $-0.49FY2026 $3.26FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +48.5%FY2026 – +37.0%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after -22.6% – -24.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.52BFY2026 $0.00FY2026 $16.51BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +20.3%FY2026 – -2.3%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after -10.2% – +7.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCFGROSSL
Held by institutions 100.0% – 4.7%
Institutions holding 968 – 174
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.8% – -7.6%
Institutions buying 547 – 111
Institutions selling 309 – 45
Buyers to sellers 1.77 – 2.47

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CFGROSSL
CF 1.00 0.20 0.39
GRO 0.20 1.00 0.11
SSL 0.39 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CF, GRO and SSL?

CF Industries Holdings (CF) is the largest by market capitalisation: CF Industries Holdings (CF) $18.24B, Brazil Potash (GRO) $99.87M, Sasol (SSL) $11.21B.

Which stock is cheaper, CF, GRO and SSL?

CF Industries Holdings (CF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CF Industries Holdings (CF) 8.8x, Brazil Potash (GRO) -0.9x, Sasol (SSL) 15.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sasol (SSL) is cheapest (CF Industries Holdings (CF) 8.5x, Sasol (SSL) 5.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sasol (SSL) returned the most: CF Industries Holdings (CF) +39.5%, Brazil Potash (GRO) -27.3%, Sasol (SSL) +167.4%. Over five years, CF Industries Holdings (CF) compounded fastest (CF Industries Holdings (CF) +15.9%/yr, Sasol (SSL) +0.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: CF Industries Holdings (CF) 1.74%, Sasol (SSL) 0.00%. Brazil Potash (GRO) and Sasol (SSL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, CF Industries Holdings (CF) has been the steadiest (CF Industries Holdings (CF) 42.6%, Brazil Potash (GRO) 79.1%, Sasol (SSL) 54.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CF, GRO and SSL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CF Industries Holdings (CF) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.