CELH vs KDP vs AKO-A Stock Comparison

Celsius Holdings, Keurig Dr Pepper and Andina Bottling Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$28.15 +0.6% 1M -55.6% 1Y
Market cap
$7.14B
P/E
119.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.05B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
3 wins
KDP Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
$34.99 +9.5% 1M +28.8% 1Y
Market cap
$47.46B
P/E
33.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.09B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
6 wins
AKO-A Andina Bottling Co Inc
$23.61 -9.1% 1M +17.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.72B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$978.34B
Div. yield
–
Non-Alcoholic Beverages Consumer Staples
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Keurig Dr Pepper leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Keurig Dr Pepper 6, Celsius Holdings 3, Andina Bottling 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCELHKDPAKO-ALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.14B $47.46B $3.72B KDP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 119.1x 33.3x 0.0x KDP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.5x 14.8x — KDP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +82.9% +27.5% +2.3% CELH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.0% 7.1% -19.6% KDP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.7% 4.3% 13.9% AKO-A
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 6.7x 3.7x CELH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -55.6% +28.8% +17.2% KDP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.4%/yr +0.5%/yr +17.0%/yr AKO-A
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 64.1% 26.5% 53.0% KDP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 40/100 50/100 CELH

Percentile Scorecard

CELHKDPAKO-A

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCELHKDPAKO-A
Valuation 54 #18 of 38 49 #20 of 38 95 #3 of 38
Growth 88 #5 of 33 50 #17 of 33 13 #29 of 33
Profitability 63 #12 of 31 67 #11 of 31 53 #15 of 31
Financial Health 65 #14 of 38 16 #32 of 38 38 #24 of 38
Shareholder Returns 55 #11 of 23 18 #19 of 23 –
Overall 65 40 50
  • CELH ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • KDP ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • AKO-A ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCELHKDPAKO-ASPY
1 month +0.6%+9.5%-9.1% -0.8%
3 months -2.2%+16.2%+3.8% +3.5%
6 months -15.1%+24.3%+1.5% +7.0%
Year to date -38.5%+24.9%+1.3% +12.2%
1 year -55.6%+28.8%+17.2% +13.0%
3 years -47.2%+17.1%+141.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year -19.2%+5.4%+34.2% +23.1%
5 years -11.6%+2.3%+118.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -2.4%+0.5%+17.0% +11.0%
10 years +4,039.7%-60.5%+8.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year +45.1%-8.9%+0.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCELHKDPAKO-ASPY
Volatility, 1Y 64.1%26.5%53.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.9%25.9%66.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.060.020.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.871.090.32 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.9%-36.9%-28.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.8%-0.6%-12.4% -1.8%
52-week high $62.22$35.19$26.96 $779.14
52-week low $23.77$25.31$20.29 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCELHKDPAKO-A
P/E now vs peer median 119.6xmedian 26.6x 33.4xmedian 26.6x 0.0xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.5x 2.4xmedian 1.5x 0.0xmedian 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 29.7xmedian 14.2x 17.9xmedian 14.2x 3.7xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.4xmedian 18.3x 24.2xmedian 18.3x 4.7xmedian 18.3x
P/B now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 2.6x 1.6xmedian 2.6x 0.0xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median 3.55median 2.09 -12.06median 2.09 —median 2.09

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCELHKDPAKO-A
Revenue $3.05B $20.09B $978.34B
Gross profit $1.49B $9.92B $395.11B
Operating income $160.31M $3.26B $497.89B
Net income $129.12M $1.50B $105.38B
Free cash flow $462.77M $1.97B $799.73M
EPS (diluted) $0.23 $1.05 –
Cash & equivalents $631.23M $1.52B $322.08B
Total debt $667.85M $29.98B $6.65T
Shares (diluted) 256.93M 1.36B –
Enterprise value $4.75B $43.50B -$985.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCELHKDPAKO-A
P/E 119.6x 33.4x 0.0x
P/FCF 15.4x 24.2x 4.7x
P/Operating cash flow 14.0x 18.8x 5.1x
P/S 2.3x 2.4x 0.0x
P/B 5.9x 1.6x 0.0x
P/Tangible book -39.6x -5.4x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA 29.7x 17.9x 3.7x
EV/EBIT 44.7x 23.3x 3.7x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 3.8x 1.9x
EV/FCF 15.5x 38.6x 2,314x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.1x 30.1x 2,532x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.55 -12.06 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCELHKDPAKO-A
Revenue growth (1Y) 82.9% 27.5% 2.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 47.4% 11.3% -34.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 76.4% 14.6% 2.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 51.1% 8.9% -33.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.5% 22.4% 14.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 62.2% 10.4% 12.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -2.0% -2.7% 5.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 46.9% -2.3% -16.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -36.7% -7.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.7% -2.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 115.8% 19.4% 17.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 66.0% 9.0% -88.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 119.5% 23.0% -7.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 67.5% 6.4% -90.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCELHKDPAKO-A
Gross margin 48.8% 49.4% 40.4%
EBITDA margin 7.9% 21.2% 50.9%
Operating margin 5.3% 16.2% 50.9%
Pretax margin 4.6% 9.8% 13.8%
Net margin 2.0% 7.1% -19.6%
FCF margin 15.2% 9.8% 0.1%
Operating cash flow margin 16.7% 12.6% 0.1%
Return on equity 10.5% 5.1% 7.6%
Return on assets 2.5% 1.9% 3.0%
Return on invested capital 7.7% 4.3% 13.9%
Return on capital employed 3.9% 5.4% 17.2%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.9x 1.7x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 0.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCELHKDPAKO-A
Debt / assets 12.9% 34.2% 63.5%
Debt / equity 0.6x 1.0x 1.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 6.7x 3.7x
Debt / FCF 1.4x 15.2x 2,774x
Liabilities / assets 76.8% 66.6% 61.1%
Equity / assets 23.2% 33.4% 38.9%
Interest coverage 3.0x – 30.2x
Current ratio 1.8x 0.5x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.2x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.1x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 2.05 0.79 1.38

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCELHKDPAKO-A
Dividend yield – 2.6% –
Net buyback yield 1.0% -9.2% –
Shareholder yield 1.0% -6.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCELHKDPAKO-A
Forward P/E 20.5xFY2026 14.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.37FY2026 $2.37FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +2.2%FY2026 +15.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +21.2% +11.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.30BFY2026 $25.28BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +30.9%FY2026 +52.3%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +0.2% +13.6% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCELHKDPAKO-A
Held by institutions 65.3% 100.0% 0.1%
Institutions holding 540 852 16
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.3% +12.9% -1.0%
Institutions buying 296 469 4
Institutions selling 179 284 5
Buyers to sellers 1.65 1.65 0.80

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CELHKDPAKO-A
CELH 1.00 0.28 0.06
KDP 0.28 1.00 -0.12
AKO-A 0.06 -0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CELH, KDP and AKO-A?

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Celsius Holdings (CELH) $7.14B, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) $47.46B, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) $3.72B.

Which stock is cheaper, CELH, KDP and AKO-A?

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 119.1x, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 33.3x, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) 0.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) is cheapest (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 20.5x, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 14.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Celsius Holdings (CELH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Celsius Holdings (CELH) +82.9%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +27.5%, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) +2.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) has the highest net margin (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 2.0%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 7.1%, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) -19.6%). On return on invested capital, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) leads (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 7.7%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 4.3%, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) 13.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) returned the most: Celsius Holdings (CELH) -55.6%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +28.8%, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) +17.2%. Over five years, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) compounded fastest (Celsius Holdings (CELH) -2.4%/yr, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) +0.5%/yr, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) +17.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) has been the steadiest (Celsius Holdings (CELH) 64.1%, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) 26.5%, Andina Bottling (AKO-A) 53.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CELH, KDP and AKO-A?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.