CDZI vs BLGO vs XYL Stock Comparison

Cadiz, Biolargo and Xylem Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ECL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CDZI Cadiz Inc
$4.65 +27.4% 1M -15.0% 1Y
Market cap
$386.66M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$14.34M
Div. yield
–
Water Treatment Industrials
2 wins
BLGO Biolargo, Inc.
$0.07 -22.2% 1M -58.8% 1Y
Market cap
$21.51M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.08M
Div. yield
–
Water Treatment Industrials
1 win
XYL Xylem Inc.
$92.78 -9.5% 1M -37.9% 1Y
Market cap
$20.49B
P/E
18.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.06B
Div. yield
0.02%
Water Treatment Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Xylem leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Xylem 5, Cadiz 2, Biolargo 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCDZIBLGOXYLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $386.66M $21.51M $20.49B XYL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -9.4x -1.5x 18.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 17.6x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.8% -70.9% +1.9% XYL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -286.1% -354.8% 11.9% XYL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 8.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.2x 1.1x BLGO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -15.0% -58.8% -37.9% CDZI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.6%/yr -16.3%/yr -6.7%/yr CDZI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 66.8% 91.7% 30.0% XYL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 25/100 12/100 79/100 XYL

Percentile Scorecard

CDZIBLGOXYL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCDZIBLGOXYL
Valuation 20 #17 of 21 10 #19 of 21 90 #3 of 21
Growth 39 #12 of 19 0 #19 of 19 89 #3 of 19
Profitability 19 #14 of 17 6 #16 of 17 69 #6 of 17
Financial Health 24 #17 of 22 10 #20 of 22 57 #10 of 22
Shareholder Returns – 33 #7 of 10 89 #2 of 10
Overall 25 12 79
  • CDZI ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment
  • BLGO ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment
  • XYL ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCDZIBLGOXYLSPY
1 month +27.4%-22.2%-9.5% -0.2%
3 months +51.0%-30.0%-25.8% +3.9%
6 months +5.0%-56.3%-21.3% +8.2%
Year to date -17.1%-61.1%-31.9% +12.9%
1 year -15.0%-58.8%-37.9% +12.3%
3 years +68.5%-56.3%+5.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +19.0%-24.1%+1.7% +23.3%
5 years -25.1%-58.8%-29.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year -5.6%-16.3%-6.7% +10.9%
10 years -36.3%-90.3%+93.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year -4.4%-20.8%+6.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCDZIBLGOXYLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 66.8%91.7%30.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.5%135.9%35.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.450.230.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.22-0.64-1.26 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.0%-82.5%-45.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.8%-65.0%-39.3% -1.2%
52-week high $6.92$0.20$152.95 $779.14
52-week low $2.98$0.07$92.78 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCDZIBLGOXYL
P/E now vs peer median -9.5xmedian 25.6x -1.6xmedian 25.6x 20.0xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 27.3xmedian 2.4x 5.6xmedian 2.4x 2.3xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 16.7x -1.4xmedian 16.7x 12.1xmedian 16.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 23.6x -2.2xmedian 23.6x 23.1xmedian 23.6x
P/B now vs peer median 83.9xmedian 2.0x -8.4xmedian 2.0x 2.1xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 2.27median 1.68 —median 1.68 0.63median 1.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCDZIBLGOXYL
Revenue $14.34M $4.08M $9.06B
Gross profit $4.25M $1.63M $3.61B
Operating income -$26.90M -$18.12M $1.37B
Net income -$35.98M -$18.79M $1.08B
Free cash flow – -$10.56M $921.00M
R&D – $3.27M $231.00M
EPS (diluted) $-1,199.69 – $4.64
Cash & equivalents $5.32M $2.19M $708.00M
Total debt $278.50M $4.85M $2.90B
Shares (diluted) 34.19K – 233.04M
Enterprise value $355.10M $6.77M $16.22B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCDZIBLGOXYL
P/E -9.5x -1.6x 20.0x
P/FCF – -2.2x 23.1x
P/Operating cash flow – -2.2x 16.7x
P/S 27.3x 5.6x 2.3x
P/B 83.9x -8.4x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 83.9x -8.4x 2.6x
EV/EBITDA – -1.4x 12.1x
EV/EBIT -17.6x -1.4x 17.1x
EV/Revenue 33.0x 6.3x 2.6x
EV/FCF – -2.4x 25.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – -2.5x 18.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.27 – 0.63

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCDZIBLGOXYL
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.8% -70.9% 1.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 89.3% -22.5% 10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -12.7% -74.4% 6.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 97.5% -27.8% 12.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -8.9% -185.8% 20.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -12.0% -60.3% 29.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -9.9% -184.9% 14.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -4.9% -62.6% 30.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -8.4% – 19.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.2% – 31.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -37.9% -0.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -62.1% 19.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -40.8% -0.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -57.1% 21.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCDZIBLGOXYL
Gross margin 29.6% 40.0% 39.8%
EBITDA margin – -434.2% 21.3%
Operating margin -187.6% -443.9% 15.1%
Pretax margin -250.5% -458.1% 14.8%
Net margin -286.1% -354.8% 11.9%
FCF margin – -258.6% 10.2%
Operating cash flow margin – -252.8% 14.0%
Return on equity -257.3% – 10.3%
Return on assets -26.1% -246.7% 6.2%
Return on invested capital – – 8.3%
Return on capital employed -21.0% -635.4% 9.5%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.5x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 59.3% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCDZIBLGOXYL
Debt / assets 64.5% 72.8% 16.7%
Debt / equity 18.6x -1.8x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.2x 1.1x
Debt / FCF – -0.5x 3.1x
Liabilities / assets 96.5% 140.9% 40.7%
Equity / assets 3.5% -40.9% 59.3%
Interest coverage -2.9x -22.5x 36.1x
Current ratio 1.2x 0.7x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.6x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.5x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -6.13 -42.03 3.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCDZIBLGOXYL
Dividend yield – – 1.8%
Net buyback yield – -2.5% 7.4%
Shareholder yield – -2.5% 9.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 37.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 44.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 6.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 14.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCDZIBLGOXYL
Forward P/E – – 17.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.54FY2026 $-0.05FY2026 $5.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +3.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +13.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.61MFY2026 $5.48MFY2026 $9.81BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -47.2%FY2026 -29.4%FY2026 +8.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +109.5% +180.2% +0.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCDZIBLGOXYL
Held by institutions 46.7% – 92.0%
Institutions holding 117 – 1,092
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.0% – +0.2%
Institutions buying 54 – 488
Institutions selling 39 – 447
Buyers to sellers 1.38 – 1.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CDZIBLGOXYL
CDZI 1.00 -0.07 0.02
BLGO -0.07 1.00 0.05
XYL 0.02 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CDZI, BLGO and XYL?

Xylem (XYL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cadiz (CDZI) $386.66M, Biolargo (BLGO) $21.51M, Xylem (XYL) $20.49B.

Which company is growing faster?

Xylem (XYL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cadiz (CDZI) -4.8%, Biolargo (BLGO) -70.9%, Xylem (XYL) +1.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Xylem (XYL) has the highest net margin (Cadiz (CDZI) -286.1%, Biolargo (BLGO) -354.8%, Xylem (XYL) 11.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cadiz (CDZI) returned the most: Cadiz (CDZI) -15.0%, Biolargo (BLGO) -58.8%, Xylem (XYL) -37.9%. Over five years, Cadiz (CDZI) compounded fastest (Cadiz (CDZI) -5.6%/yr, Biolargo (BLGO) -16.3%/yr, Xylem (XYL) -6.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cadiz (CDZI) 0.00%, Biolargo (BLGO) 0.00%, Xylem (XYL) 0.02%. Cadiz (CDZI) and Biolargo (BLGO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Xylem (XYL) has been the steadiest (Cadiz (CDZI) 66.8%, Biolargo (BLGO) 91.7%, Xylem (XYL) 30.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CDZI, BLGO and XYL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Xylem (XYL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.