CDNS vs PERF vs SSTK Stock Comparison

Cadence Design Systems, Perfect and Shutterstock Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AMD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CDNS Cadence Design Systems Inc
$342.46 +4.8% 1M +0.3% 1Y
Market cap
$93.72B
P/E
67.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.13B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
4 wins
PERF Perfect Corp.
$2.00 +4.2% 1M +1.0% 1Y
Market cap
$170.12M
P/E
35.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$71.07M
Div. yield
–
Creative Software Technology
7 wins
SSTK Shutterstock, Inc.
$4.41 +9.2% 1M -82.4% 1Y
Market cap
$159.84M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$901.29M
Div. yield
–
Digital Marketplaces Technology

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Perfect leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Perfect 7, Cadence Design Systems 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCDNSPERFSSTKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $93.72B $170.12M $159.84M CDNS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 67.9x 35.3x -0.8x PERF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 38.7x 28.6x — PERF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.6% +10.4% -10.8% CDNS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 8.1% -22.9% PERF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.8% -21.6% PERF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -67.9x -2.1x PERF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.3% +1.0% -82.4% PERF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.6%/yr — -48.5%/yr CDNS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.3% 47.8% 72.5% CDNS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 61/100 48/100 PERF

Percentile Scorecard

CDNSPERFSSTK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCDNSPERFSSTK
Valuation 26 #70 of 94 82 #6 of 29 81 #33 of 166
Growth 62 #36 of 92 35 #18 of 27 15 #129 of 152
Profitability 54 #42 of 90 36 #17 of 26 26 #113 of 152
Financial Health – 90 #4 of 31 20 #143 of 179
Shareholder Returns – – 98 #3 of 94
Overall 47 61 48
  • CDNS ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • PERF ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • SSTK ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCDNSPERFSSTKSPY
1 month +4.8%+4.2%+9.2% +0.9%
3 months +2.9%+4.2%-22.6% +5.9%
6 months +3.8%+22.0%-73.6% +8.5%
Year to date +9.6%+10.5%-76.9% +13.3%
1 year +0.3%+1.0%-82.4% +12.4%
3 years +48.3%-27.3%-87.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year +14.1%-10.1%-49.4% +23.5%
5 years +97.8%—-96.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year +14.6%—-48.5% +11.0%
10 years +1,249.3%—-92.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year +29.7%—-22.9% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCDNSPERFSSTKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.3%47.8%72.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.8%47.4%81.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.630.221.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.010.02-1.14 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.0%-88.2%-96.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.8%-4.3%-82.4% -0.9%
52-week high $416.39$2.09$25.06 $779.14
52-week low $265.66$1.30$3.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCDNSPERFSSTK
P/E now vs peer median 68.0xmedian 46.0x 35.3xmedian 31.0x -0.8xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 15.4xmedian 7.9x 2.4xmedian 2.5x 0.2xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 28.3x 7.0xmedian 11.2x -4.5xmedian 13.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 53.2xmedian 41.4x 15.6xmedian 15.6x 1.8xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 13.7xmedian 4.6x 1.1xmedian 3.2x 0.4xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 5.46median 2.30 1.33median 0.74 0.01median 0.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCDNSPERFSSTK
Revenue $6.13B $71.07M $901.29M
Gross profit – $56.66M $512.75M
Operating income $1.77B $1.26M -$156.06M
Net income $1.38B $8.43M -$206.14M
Free cash flow – $10.88M $90.15M
R&D $2.04B $14.93M $85.39M
EPS (diluted) $5.00 $0.06 $-5.62
Cash & equivalents $1.45B $125.62M $133.21M
Total debt – $7.81M $273.27M
Shares (diluted) 276.16M 101.85M 36.70M
Enterprise value $93.72B -$417.85M -$479.66M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCDNSPERFSSTK
P/E 68.0x 35.3x -0.8x
P/FCF 53.2x 15.6x 1.8x
P/Operating cash flow 47.9x 16.2x 1.2x
P/S 15.4x 2.4x 0.2x
P/B 13.7x 1.1x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 18.6x 1.1x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA – 7.0x -4.5x
EV/EBIT – 12.6x -1.9x
EV/Revenue 15.4x 0.2x 0.3x
EV/FCF – 1.5x 3.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 47.9x 1.5x 2.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.46 1.33 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCDNSPERFSSTK
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.6% 10.4% -10.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.1% 13.4% 2.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 14.5% -12.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 12.4% -0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.4% 157.8% -304.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 16.4% 26.4% -56.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 30.1% 37.7% -420.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 13.0% 26.9% -56.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 29.0% -1.4% -414.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.5% 26.4% -56.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 21.7% -32.0% 173.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.6% – -12.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -31.0% 3,283%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -15.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCDNSPERFSSTK
Gross margin – 79.7% 56.9%
EBITDA margin – 3.2% -7.4%
Operating margin – 1.8% -17.3%
Pretax margin – 10.0% -22.0%
Net margin – 8.1% -22.9%
FCF margin – 15.3% 10.0%
Operating cash flow margin 32.1% 14.8% 14.7%
Return on equity – 5.4% -46.0%
Return on assets – 4.3% -17.2%
Return on invested capital – 0.8% -21.6%
Return on capital employed – 0.8% -25.4%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.4x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.2x -0.6x
Stock comp / revenue 8.9% 1.1% 5.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCDNSPERFSSTK
Debt / assets – 4.0% 25.0%
Debt / equity – 0.0x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – -67.9x -2.1x
Debt / FCF – 0.7x 3.0x
Liabilities / assets – 19.4% 66.7%
Equity / assets 56.2% 80.6% 33.3%
Interest coverage – 66.4x -9.8x
Current ratio 1.4x 4.6x 0.5x
Quick ratio – 4.6x 0.5x
Cash ratio – 4.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 1.28 0.29

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCDNSPERFSSTK
Dividend yield – – 23.8%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 23.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCDNSPERFSSTK
Forward P/E 38.7xFY2026 28.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $8.84FY2026 $0.07FY2026 $-0.97FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +23.8%FY2026 +40.0%FY2026 -177.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +14.6% +14.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.79BFY2026 $76.52MFY2026 $829.27MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.2%FY2026 +10.7%FY2026 -16.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.9% +8.1% -9.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCDNSPERFSSTK
Held by institutions 88.2% – 54.0%
Institutions holding 1,500 – 165
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.4% – -11.3%
Institutions buying 833 – 81
Institutions selling 518 – 49
Buyers to sellers 1.61 – 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CDNSPERFSSTK
CDNS 1.00 0.11 0.09
PERF 0.11 1.00 0.01
SSTK 0.09 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CDNS, PERF and SSTK?

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) $93.72B, Perfect (PERF) $170.12M, Shutterstock (SSTK) $159.84M.

Which stock is cheaper, CDNS, PERF and SSTK?

Perfect (PERF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) 67.9x, Perfect (PERF) 35.3x, Shutterstock (SSTK) -0.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Perfect (PERF) is cheapest (Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) 38.7x, Perfect (PERF) 28.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) +17.6%, Perfect (PERF) +10.4%, Shutterstock (SSTK) -10.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Perfect (PERF) has the highest net margin (Perfect (PERF) 8.1%, Shutterstock (SSTK) -22.9%). On return on invested capital, Perfect (PERF) leads (Perfect (PERF) 0.8%, Shutterstock (SSTK) -21.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Perfect (PERF) returned the most: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) +0.3%, Perfect (PERF) +1.0%, Shutterstock (SSTK) -82.4%. Over five years, Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) compounded fastest (Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) +14.6%/yr, Shutterstock (SSTK) -48.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) has been the steadiest (Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) 41.3%, Perfect (PERF) 47.8%, Shutterstock (SSTK) 72.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CDNS, PERF and SSTK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Perfect (PERF) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.