CDNS vs GMM vs PERF Stock Comparison

Cadence Design Systems, Global Mofy AI and Perfect Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ARM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CDNS Cadence Design Systems Inc
$342.75 +5.7% 1M +0.4% 1Y
Market cap
$89.76B
P/E
65.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.13B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
5 wins
GMM Global Mofy AI Ltd
$1.13 -37.6% 1M -98.8% 1Y
Market cap
$304.27K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Creative Software Technology
PERF Perfect Corp.
$2.00 +4.2% 1M +1.0% 1Y
Market cap
$170.12M
P/E
35.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$71.07M
Div. yield
–
Creative Software Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Cadence Design Systems leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Cadence Design Systems 5, Perfect 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCDNSGMMPERFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $89.76B $304.27K $170.12M CDNS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 65.0x — 35.3x PERF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 38.8x — 28.6x PERF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.6% — +10.4% CDNS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 22.5% — 8.1% CDNS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.1% — 0.8% CDNS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.5x — -67.9x PERF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.4% -98.8% +1.0% PERF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.6%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 41.3% 207.5% 47.8% CDNS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 — 59/100 PERF

Percentile Scorecard

CDNSGMMPERF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCDNSGMMPERF
Valuation 34 #62 of 94 – 82 #6 of 29
Growth 64 #34 of 92 – 31 #19 of 27
Profitability 85 #14 of 88 – 36 #17 of 26
Financial Health 32 #66 of 96 67 #11 of 31 87 #5 of 31
Shareholder Returns 76 #18 of 72 – –
Overall 58 – 59
  • CDNS ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • GMM ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • PERF ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCDNSGMMPERFSPY
1 month +5.7%-37.6%+4.2% +0.7%
3 months +3.0%-60.5%+4.2% +3.7%
6 months +4.0%-98.2%+22.0% +7.1%
Year to date +9.7%-98.1%+10.5% +12.8%
1 year +0.4%-98.8%+1.0% +11.9%
3 years +46.6%-99.8%-27.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +13.6%-88.2%-10.1% +22.8%
5 years +98.0%—— +67.6%
5 years, per year +14.6%—— +10.9%
10 years +1,250.5%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +29.7%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCDNSGMMPERFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 41.3%207.5%47.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.8%225.0%47.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.631.550.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.01-0.480.02 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.0%-99.9%-88.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.7%-98.8%-4.3% -1.2%
52-week high $416.39$97.50$2.09 $779.14
52-week low $265.66$0.87$1.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCDNSGMMPERF
P/E now vs peer median 68.0xmedian 46.4x —median 33.1x 35.3xmedian 33.1x
P/S now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 7.8x —median 2.5x 2.4xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 44.1xmedian 27.5x —median 9.8x 7.0xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 53.3xmedian 40.1x —median 15.2x 15.6xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 13.7xmedian 4.7x 0.0xmedian 3.1x 1.1xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 5.40median 2.10 —median 0.74 1.33median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCDNSGMMPERF
Revenue $6.13B – $71.07M
Gross profit $5.25B – $56.66M
Operating income $1.77B – $1.26M
Net income $1.38B – $8.43M
Free cash flow $1.76B – $10.88M
R&D $2.04B – $14.93M
EPS (diluted) $5.02 – $0.06
Cash & equivalents $1.45B $2.83M $125.62M
Total debt $2.63B $16.17M $7.81M
Shares (diluted) 275.28M 281.73K 101.85M
Enterprise value $82.46B -$23.88M -$417.85M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCDNSGMMPERF
P/E 68.0x – 35.3x
P/FCF 53.3x – 15.6x
P/Operating cash flow 47.8x – 16.2x
P/S 15.3x – 2.4x
P/B 13.7x 0.0x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 18.5x 0.0x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 44.1x – 7.0x
EV/EBIT 53.7x – 12.6x
EV/Revenue 15.5x – 0.2x
EV/FCF 54.0x – 1.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 48.4x – 1.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.40 – 1.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCDNSGMMPERF
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.6% – 10.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.1% – 13.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.8% – 14.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.5% – 12.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.4% – 157.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 16.4% – 26.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 30.1% – 37.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 13.0% – 26.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 29.4% – -1.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.6% – 26.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 21.7% – -32.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.6% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.3% – -31.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.6% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCDNSGMMPERF
Gross margin 85.7% – 79.7%
EBITDA margin 35.2% – 3.2%
Operating margin 28.9% – 1.8%
Pretax margin 30.0% – 10.0%
Net margin 22.5% – 8.1%
FCF margin 28.8% – 15.3%
Operating cash flow margin 32.1% – 14.8%
Return on equity 20.1% – 5.4%
Return on assets 11.4% – 4.3%
Return on invested capital 14.1% – 0.8%
Return on capital employed 18.3% – 0.8%
Asset turnover 0.5x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x – 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 8.9% – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCDNSGMMPERF
Debt / assets 21.5% 4.9% 4.0%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.5x – -67.9x
Debt / FCF 1.5x – 0.7x
Liabilities / assets 43.8% 32.6% 19.4%
Equity / assets 56.2% 67.4% 80.6%
Interest coverage 14.0x – 66.4x
Current ratio 1.4x 1.9x 4.6x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.1x 4.6x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.2x 4.4x
Altman Z-score 12.54 – 1.28

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCDNSGMMPERF
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.9% – –
Shareholder yield 0.9% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCDNSGMMPERF
Forward P/E 38.8xFY2026 – 28.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.84FY2026 – $0.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +23.8%FY2026 – +40.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +14.6% – +14.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.79BFY2026 – $76.52MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.2%FY2026 – +10.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.9% – +8.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCDNSGMMPERF
Held by institutions 88.2% – –
Institutions holding 1,501 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.4% – –
Institutions buying 834 – –
Institutions selling 518 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.61 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CDNSGMMPERF
CDNS 1.00 -0.02 0.11
GMM -0.02 1.00 0.05
PERF 0.11 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CDNS, GMM and PERF?

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) $89.76B, Global Mofy AI (GMM) $304.27K, Perfect (PERF) $170.12M.

Which stock is cheaper, CDNS, GMM and PERF?

Perfect (PERF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) 65.0x, Perfect (PERF) 35.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Perfect (PERF) is cheapest (Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) 38.8x, Perfect (PERF) 28.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) +17.6%, Perfect (PERF) +10.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) has the highest net margin (Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) 22.5%, Perfect (PERF) 8.1%). On return on invested capital, Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) leads (Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) 14.1%, Perfect (PERF) 0.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Perfect (PERF) returned the most: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) +0.4%, Global Mofy AI (GMM) -98.8%, Perfect (PERF) +1.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) has been the steadiest (Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) 41.3%, Global Mofy AI (GMM) 207.5%, Perfect (PERF) 47.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CDNS, GMM and PERF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.