CBSH vs BSAC vs TFC Stock Comparison

Commerce Bancshares, Banco Santander Chile and Truist Financial Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BSAC Banco Santander Chile
$31.82 -7.4% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$14.97B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins
TFC Truist Financial Corp
$48.56 +1.9% 1M +8.8% 1Y
Market cap
$59.18B
P/E
12.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Banco Santander Chile leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Banco Santander Chile 4, Commerce Bancshares 3, Truist Financial 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCBSHBSACTFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $15.88B $14.97B $59.18B TFC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.2x 0.0x 12.2x BSAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.2x 11.2x 11.3x BSAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.6% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 31.3% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.2% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x 0.0x — CBSH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +9.5% +12.3% +8.8% BSAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.9%/yr +11.9%/yr -5.3%/yr BSAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 18.5% 28.9% 23.4% CBSH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 33/100 61/100 CBSH

Percentile Scorecard

CBSHBSACTFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCBSHBSACTFC
Valuation 3 #348 of 360 11 #319 of 360 87 #49 of 360
Growth 66 #65 of 191 21 #152 of 191 8 #176 of 191
Profitability 96 #8 of 168 – –
Financial Health 96 #8 of 175 8 #161 of 175 –
Shareholder Returns 62 #130 of 341 93 #25 of 341 89 #39 of 341
Overall 65 33 61
  • CBSH ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • BSAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • TFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCBSHBSACTFCSPY
1 month -1.9%-7.4%+1.9% -0.2%
3 months -7.8%-6.2%-8.4% +3.9%
6 months +6.5%-3.8%-5.1% +8.2%
Year to date +5.7%+2.3%-1.3% +12.9%
1 year +9.5%+12.3%+8.8% +12.3%
3 years +46.8%+82.0%+75.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +13.7%+22.1%+20.7% +23.3%
5 years -4.4%+75.4%-24.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year -0.9%+11.9%-5.3% +10.9%
10 years +48.0%+44.2%+23.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year +4.0%+3.7%+2.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCBSHBSACTFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 18.5%28.9%23.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 19.4%30.5%26.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.221.090.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.510.430.38 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.1%-40.5%-61.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.3%-15.1%-13.0% -1.2%
52-week high $60.33$37.46$55.81 $779.14
52-week low $47.49$28.22$43.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCBSHBSACTFC
P/E now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 12.1x 0.0xmedian 12.1x 12.2xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 8.6xmedian 3.4x 2.8xmedian 3.4x 2.7xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 5.0x 0.0xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 10.9x -486.3xmedian 10.9x 9.8xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x 1.0xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 5.49median 1.34 0.00median 1.34 -34.11median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCBSHBSACTFC
Revenue $1.86B – –
Operating income – $278.26B –
Net income $590.84M -$1.70T $5.19B
Free cash flow $1.21B – –
EPS (diluted) $4.04 $1,126.89 $3.93
Cash & equivalents – $2.20B –
Total debt $26.29M $47.85B –
Shares (diluted) 144.31M 471.12M 1.24B
Enterprise value $15.67B -$10.98T $59.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCBSHBSACTFC
P/E 27.4x 0.0x 12.2x
P/FCF 13.2x -486.3x 9.8x
P/Operating cash flow 12.6x – –
P/S 8.6x 2.8x 2.7x
P/B 3.6x 2.4x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 3.8x -0.2x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 13.2x 0.0x –
EV/EBIT 14.1x 0.2x –
EV/Revenue 8.5x – –
EV/FCF 13.1x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 12.6x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.49 0.00 -34.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCBSHBSACTFC
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.6% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.1% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -85.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 44.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 5.0% -229.4% -0.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.0% -114.2% -3.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 0.9% -18.5% 4.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 5.0% 48.4% -0.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 131.6% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 36.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 145.2% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 44.0% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCBSHBSACTFC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 64.6% – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 40.7% – –
Net margin 31.3% – –
FCF margin 65.1% – –
Operating cash flow margin 67.7% – –
Return on equity 13.6% – 8.3%
Return on assets 1.7% 2,022% 0.9%
Return on invested capital 20.2% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x – –
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCBSHBSACTFC
Debt / assets 0.1% 63.2% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 7.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x 0.0x –
Debt / FCF 0.0x – –
Liabilities / assets 87.6% 91.8% 88.9%
Equity / assets 12.4% 8.2% 11.1%
Interest coverage 3.0x – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – 0.1x –
Cash ratio – 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCBSHBSACTFC
Dividend yield 2.0% 4.7% 4.3%
Net buyback yield 2.1% – –
Shareholder yield 4.1% 4.7% 4.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCBSHBSACTFC
Forward P/E 12.2xFY2026 11.2xFY2026 11.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.53FY2026 $2.84FY2026 $4.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.1%FY2026 +9.7%FY2026 +12.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.3% +2.5% +18.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.10BFY2026 $3.07BFY2026 $19.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.4%FY2026 -7.8%FY2026 -4.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -4.6% +19.1% +1.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCBSHBSACTFC
Held by institutions 37.7% 4.7% 76.7%
Institutions holding 507 157 1,687
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.8% +1.7% +0.8%
Institutions buying 266 82 798
Institutions selling 144 51 657
Buyers to sellers 1.85 1.61 1.21

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CBSHBSACTFC
CBSH 1.00 0.16 0.70
BSAC 0.16 1.00 0.32
TFC 0.70 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CBSH, BSAC and TFC?

Truist Financial (TFC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) $15.88B, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) $14.97B, Truist Financial (TFC) $59.18B.

Which stock is cheaper, CBSH, BSAC and TFC?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 27.2x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.0x, Truist Financial (TFC) 12.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) is cheapest (Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 12.2x, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 11.2x, Truist Financial (TFC) 11.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) returned the most: Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) +9.5%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +12.3%, Truist Financial (TFC) +8.8%. Over five years, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) compounded fastest (Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) -0.9%/yr, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +11.9%/yr, Truist Financial (TFC) -5.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) has been the steadiest (Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) 18.5%, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 28.9%, Truist Financial (TFC) 23.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CBSH, BSAC and TFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.