CBLL vs NEOG vs NNOX Stock Comparison

Ceribell, Neogen and Nano-X Imaging Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (HTFL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CBLL Ceribell, Inc.
$26.01 +6.9% 1M +120.8% 1Y
Market cap
$1.03B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$108.72M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
2 wins
NEOG Neogen Corp
$11.68 -2.3% 1M +88.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.56B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$883.99M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
5 wins
NNOX Nano-X Imaging Ltd.
$0.25 -59.7% 1M -92.3% 1Y
Market cap
$15.39M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$15.63M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Neogen leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Neogen 5, Nano-X Imaging 2, Ceribell 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCBLLNEOGNNOXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.03B $2.56B $15.39M NEOG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.9x -45.7x -0.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 36.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.3% -0.3% +31.5% NNOX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -68.0% -6.3% -747.2% NEOG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -0.2% -116.9% NEOG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 5.4x 0.3x NNOX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +120.8% +88.1% -92.3% CBLL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -23.8%/yr -60.4%/yr NEOG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.6% 55.9% 106.8% CBLL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 58/100 36/100 NEOG

Percentile Scorecard

CBLLNEOGNNOX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCBLLNEOGNNOX
Valuation 19 #185 of 229 72 #65 of 229 53 #108 of 229
Growth 19 #179 of 221 49 #114 of 221 11 #197 of 221
Profitability 36 #135 of 210 60 #84 of 210 9 #191 of 210
Financial Health 80 #49 of 240 49 #122 of 240 72 #69 of 240
Shareholder Returns 31 #102 of 147 58 #62 of 147 –
Overall 37 58 36
  • CBLL ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • NEOG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • NNOX ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCBLLNEOGNNOXSPY
1 month +6.9%-2.3%-59.7% -5.9%
3 months +42.5%+3.4%-75.5% -4.6%
6 months +27.6%+26.3%-85.8% +0.2%
Year to date +18.6%+67.1%-91.1% +7.5%
1 year +120.8%+88.1%-92.3% +8.2%
3 years —-26.2%-95.6% +68.3%
3 years, per year —-9.6%-64.8% +19.0%
5 years —-74.2%-99.0% +56.5%
5 years, per year —-23.8%-60.4% +9.4%
10 years —-41.0%— +251.5%
10 years, per year —-5.1%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureCBLLNEOGNNOXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.6%55.9%106.8% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 49.4%47.3%118.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.131.421.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.341.58-0.86 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.9%-90.6%-99.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.0%-16.5%-94.5% -5.9%
52-week high $28.27$13.98$4.55 $779.14
52-week low $11.56$5.41$0.25 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCBLLNEOGNNOX
P/E now vs peer median -13.6xmedian 26.9x -45.4xmedian 26.9x -0.1xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 9.3xmedian 2.9x 2.9xmedian 2.9x 1.1xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -12.3xmedian 17.5x 28.4xmedian 17.5x 0.1xmedian 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -17.9xmedian 26.4x 51.2xmedian 26.4x -0.3xmedian 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median 8.6xmedian 2.3x 1.2xmedian 2.3x 0.2xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.88 1.62median 0.88 -0.06median 0.88

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCBLLNEOGNNOX
Revenue $108.72M $883.99M $15.63M
Gross profit $97.04M $418.98M -$52.76M
Operating income -$75.87M -$7.38M -$119.69M
Net income -$73.88M -$56.10M -$116.81M
Free cash flow -$56.43M $49.80M -$52.09M
R&D $25.37M $19.76M $18.93M
EPS (diluted) $-1.92 $-0.26 $-1.80
Cash & equivalents $41.99M $172.00M $31.02M
Total debt $20.00M $774.20M $3.00M
Shares (diluted) 38.50M 218.10M 64.79M
Enterprise value $478.85M $1.90B -$165.42M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCBLLNEOGNNOX
P/E -13.6x -45.4x -0.1x
P/FCF -17.9x 51.2x -0.3x
P/Operating cash flow -18.0x 29.9x -0.4x
P/S 9.3x 2.9x 1.1x
P/B 8.6x 1.2x 0.2x
P/Tangible book 8.6x 3.2x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA -12.3x 28.4x 0.1x
EV/EBIT -12.0x -427.3x 0.1x
EV/Revenue 8.4x 3.6x -0.7x
EV/FCF -16.2x 63.3x 0.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -16.3x 37.0x 0.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.62 -0.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCBLLNEOGNNOX
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.3% -0.3% 31.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -1.3% 17.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 33.2% 1.8% -340.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -3.1% -101.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -33.8% 99.3% -107.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -29.0% -5.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -40.8% 94.6% -109.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -28.3% -4.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -34.6% 94.6% -90.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -28.0% 2.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -40.0% -1.9% -21.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% -2.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -37.8% 1,631% -19.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 126.1% 1.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCBLLNEOGNNOX
Gross margin 89.3% 47.4% -337.5%
EBITDA margin -68.4% 12.5% -692.4%
Operating margin -69.8% -0.8% -765.6%
Pretax margin -68.0% -7.7% -758.5%
Net margin -68.0% -6.3% -747.2%
FCF margin -51.9% 5.6% -333.2%
Operating cash flow margin -51.5% 9.6% -298.7%
Return on equity -60.1% -2.7% -117.5%
Return on assets -45.8% -1.7% -98.6%
Return on invested capital – -0.2% -116.9%
Return on capital employed -52.9% -0.2% -114.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.3x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x -1.5x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 18.6% 1.3% 34.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCBLLNEOGNNOX
Debt / assets 12.8% 23.4% 3.3%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 5.4x 0.3x
Debt / FCF -0.4x 15.5x -0.1x
Liabilities / assets 24.8% 36.8% 20.5%
Equity / assets 75.2% 63.2% 79.5%
Interest coverage -47.4x – –
Current ratio 8.2x 3.9x 2.8x
Quick ratio 7.6x 2.1x 2.4x
Cash ratio 6.5x 1.2x 2.3x
Altman Z-score 13.18 1.44 -11.23

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCBLLNEOGNNOX
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.8% -0.1% –
Shareholder yield -0.8% -0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCBLLNEOGNNOX
Forward P/E – 36.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.90FY2026 $0.32FY2026 $-1.31FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – 0.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +31.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $118.41MFY2026 $847.28MFY2026 $18.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +33.0%FY2026 -2.7%FY2026 +43.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +21.2% -1.5% +59.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCBLLNEOGNNOX
Held by institutions 79.9% 100.0% 15.0%
Institutions holding 124 315 103
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.2% +1.6% -46.0%
Institutions buying 74 150 55
Institutions selling 36 106 28
Buyers to sellers 2.06 1.42 1.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CBLLNEOGNNOX
CBLL 1.00 0.25 0.14
NEOG 0.25 1.00 0.07
NNOX 0.14 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CBLL, NEOG and NNOX?

Neogen (NEOG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ceribell (CBLL) $1.03B, Neogen (NEOG) $2.56B, Nano-X Imaging (NNOX) $15.39M.

Which company is growing faster?

Nano-X Imaging (NNOX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ceribell (CBLL) +31.3%, Neogen (NEOG) -0.3%, Nano-X Imaging (NNOX) +31.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Neogen (NEOG) has the highest net margin (Ceribell (CBLL) -68.0%, Neogen (NEOG) -6.3%, Nano-X Imaging (NNOX) -747.2%). On return on invested capital, Neogen (NEOG) leads (Neogen (NEOG) -0.2%, Nano-X Imaging (NNOX) -116.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ceribell (CBLL) returned the most: Ceribell (CBLL) +120.8%, Neogen (NEOG) +88.1%, Nano-X Imaging (NNOX) -92.3%. Over five years, Neogen (NEOG) compounded fastest (Neogen (NEOG) -23.8%/yr, Nano-X Imaging (NNOX) -60.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ceribell (CBLL) has been the steadiest (Ceribell (CBLL) 51.6%, Neogen (NEOG) 55.9%, Nano-X Imaging (NNOX) 106.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CBLL, NEOG and NNOX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Neogen (NEOG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.