CAT vs OSK vs WFC Stock Comparison

Caterpillar, Oshkosh and Wells Fargo & Company Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CAT Caterpillar Inc
$691.78 -15.8% 1M +32.3% 1Y
Market cap
$328.70B
P/E
30.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$74.73B
Div. yield
0.01%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
6 wins
OSK Oshkosh Corp
$133.29 +0.4% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$8.38B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.61B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
2 wins
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$82.65 -0.4% 1M -4.4% 1Y
Market cap
$251.74B
P/E
12.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Caterpillar leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Caterpillar 6, Wells Fargo & Company 3, Oshkosh 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCATOSKWFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $328.70B $8.38B $251.74B CAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.3x 15.1x 12.4x WFC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.8x 13.3x 10.6x WFC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.4% +2.2% +5.4% CAT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.5% 5.2% — CAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.9% 11.4% — CAT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 0.7x — OSK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +32.3% -4.4% -4.4% CAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +28.7%/yr +5.2%/yr +10.6%/yr CAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.5% 40.5% 25.6% WFC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 72/100 38/100 OSK

Percentile Scorecard

CATOSKWFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCATOSKWFC
Valuation 22 #159 of 203 95 #12 of 203 62 #138 of 362
Growth 68 #60 of 187 60 #76 of 187 21 #174 of 221
Profitability 92 #16 of 185 64 #68 of 185 –
Financial Health 17 #183 of 219 52 #106 of 219 –
Shareholder Returns 56 #68 of 153 90 #16 of 153 32 #234 of 342
Overall 51 72 38
  • CAT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • OSK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • WFC ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCATOSKWFCSPY
1 month -15.8%+0.4%-0.4% -0.8%
3 months -20.8%-13.9%-5.3% +3.5%
6 months -16.5%-11.6%+2.6% +7.0%
Year to date +20.8%+6.1%-11.3% +12.2%
1 year +32.3%-4.4%-4.4% +13.0%
3 years +190.0%+54.4%+113.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +42.6%+15.6%+28.7% +23.1%
5 years +252.7%+28.9%+65.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +28.7%+5.2%+10.6% +11.0%
10 years +722.3%+149.5%+79.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +23.5%+9.6%+6.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCATOSKWFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.5%40.5%25.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.9%40.5%29.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.851.400.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.80-0.11-0.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.5%-43.5%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.0%-25.1%-14.3% -1.8%
52-week high $1,064.90$177.94$96.39 $779.14
52-week low $524.47$118.59$73.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCATOSKWFC
P/E now vs peer median 29.4xmedian 26.0x 15.0xmedian 26.0x 12.4xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 1.9x 0.8xmedian 1.9x 2.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 23.0xmedian 14.0x 8.6xmedian 14.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 35.4xmedian 21.4x 7.3xmedian 21.4x 12.7xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 16.4xmedian 2.2x 1.8xmedian 2.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.25median 1.26 1.17median 1.26 1.10median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCATOSKWFC
Revenue $74.73B $10.61B $87.23B
Gross profit $25.66B $1.69B –
Operating income $13.09B $797.60M –
Net income $10.84B $556.30M –
Free cash flow $8.99B $1.12B –
R&D $2.27B – –
EPS (diluted) $23.45 $8.87 $6.62
Cash & equivalents $6.71B $403.60M –
Total debt $45.15B $1.10B –
Shares (diluted) 462.50M 62.75M 3.07B
Enterprise value $300.40B $7.04B $251.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCATOSKWFC
P/E 29.4x 15.0x 12.4x
P/FCF 35.4x 7.3x 12.7x
P/Operating cash flow 23.4x 6.3x –
P/S 4.3x 0.8x 2.9x
P/B 16.4x 1.8x –
P/Tangible book 16.8x 2.2x –
EV/EBITDA 23.0x 8.6x –
EV/EBIT 27.2x 11.2x –
EV/Revenue 4.8x 0.8x 2.9x
EV/FCF 39.6x 8.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 26.3x 6.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.25 1.17 1.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCATOSKWFC
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.4% 2.2% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.9% 5.8% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.7% -10.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 7.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.7% -16.7% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.7% 8.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 14.9% -14.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 11.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 17.1% -11.7% 6.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 13.0% 12.8% 11.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.3% 60.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.6% 57.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16.2% 99.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.4% 49.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCATOSKWFC
Gross margin 34.3% 15.9% –
EBITDA margin 20.7% 9.8% –
Operating margin 17.5% 7.5% –
Pretax margin 18.6% 6.5% –
Net margin 14.5% 5.2% –
FCF margin 12.0% 10.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 18.2% 12.3% –
Return on equity 57.0% 12.4% –
Return on assets 10.9% 5.6% –
Return on invested capital 15.9% 11.4% –
Return on capital employed 22.1% 11.5% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 2.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCATOSKWFC
Debt / assets 44.0% 11.0% –
Debt / equity 2.3x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 0.7x –
Debt / FCF 5.0x 1.0x –
Liabilities / assets 81.1% 55.0% 92.1%
Equity / assets 18.9% 45.0% –
Interest coverage 6.8x 6.6x –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.7x –
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.7x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score 4.57 3.18 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCATOSKWFC
Dividend yield 0.9% 1.7% 2.2%
Net buyback yield 2.3% 4.2% –
Shareholder yield 3.2% 5.9% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 25.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 31.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.2% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 4.1% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCATOSKWFC
Forward P/E 26.8xFY2026 13.3xFY2026 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $25.79FY2026 $10.00FY2026 $7.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +35.3%FY2026 -7.3%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +31.4% +46.4% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $84.12BFY2026 $10.70BFY2026 $94.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.5%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.5% +5.3% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCATOSKWFC
Held by institutions 72.3% 100.0% 76.8%
Institutions holding 4,055 598 2,875
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.5% +5.1% +1.1%
Institutions buying 1,886 309 1,290
Institutions selling 1,595 188 1,134
Buyers to sellers 1.18 1.64 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CATOSKWFC
CAT 1.00 0.53 0.25
OSK 0.53 1.00 0.39
WFC 0.25 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CAT, OSK and WFC?

Caterpillar (CAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Caterpillar (CAT) $328.70B, Oshkosh (OSK) $8.38B, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $251.74B.

Which stock is cheaper, CAT, OSK and WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Caterpillar (CAT) 30.3x, Oshkosh (OSK) 15.1x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 12.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is cheapest (Caterpillar (CAT) 26.8x, Oshkosh (OSK) 13.3x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Caterpillar (CAT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Caterpillar (CAT) +18.4%, Oshkosh (OSK) +2.2%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Caterpillar (CAT) has the highest net margin (Caterpillar (CAT) 14.5%, Oshkosh (OSK) 5.2%). On return on invested capital, Caterpillar (CAT) leads (Caterpillar (CAT) 15.9%, Oshkosh (OSK) 11.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Caterpillar (CAT) returned the most: Caterpillar (CAT) +32.3%, Oshkosh (OSK) -4.4%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) -4.4%. Over five years, Caterpillar (CAT) compounded fastest (Caterpillar (CAT) +28.7%/yr, Oshkosh (OSK) +5.2%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +10.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Caterpillar (CAT) 0.01%, Oshkosh (OSK) 0.00%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 0.00%. Oshkosh (OSK) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has been the steadiest (Caterpillar (CAT) 40.5%, Oshkosh (OSK) 40.5%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CAT, OSK and WFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Caterpillar (CAT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.