CAT vs HWM vs DAN Stock Comparison

Caterpillar, Howmet Aerospace and Dana Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CAT Caterpillar Inc
$686.82 -15.5% 1M +32.0% 1Y
Market cap
$318.29B
P/E
29.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$74.73B
Div. yield
0.01%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
2 wins
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc.
$185.88 -18.7% 1M -7.1% 1Y
Market cap
$77.71B
P/E
41.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.12B
Div. yield
0.00%
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
6 wins
DAN DANA Inc
$26.80 -9.8% 1M +35.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.92B
P/E
2.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.66B
Div. yield
0.02%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Howmet Aerospace leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Howmet Aerospace 6, Dana 4, Caterpillar 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCATHWMDANLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $318.29B $77.71B $2.92B CAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.4x 41.6x 2.6x DAN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.6x 35.8x 14.1x DAN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.4% +18.1% +3.7% CAT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.5% 20.5% 14.6% HWM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.9% 19.4% 0.0% HWM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 1.4x 1.8x HWM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.02% DAN
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +32.0% -7.1% +35.0% DAN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +27.9%/yr +43.6%/yr +1.9%/yr HWM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.4% 34.9% 44.1% HWM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 74/100 62/100 HWM

Percentile Scorecard

CATHWMDAN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCATHWMDAN
Valuation 22 #159 of 203 39 #61 of 100 96 #10 of 203
Growth 68 #61 of 188 90 #11 of 97 82 #35 of 188
Profitability 91 #17 of 187 98 #3 of 96 47 #99 of 187
Financial Health 16 #186 of 222 50 #54 of 106 20 #177 of 222
Shareholder Returns 53 #72 of 153 92 #6 of 65 64 #56 of 153
Overall 50 74 62
  • CAT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • HWM ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • DAN ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCATHWMDANSPY
1 month -15.5%-18.7%-9.8% -1.0%
3 months -22.7%-35.8%-0.9% +2.9%
6 months -17.3%-23.3%-31.2% +6.4%
Year to date +19.9%-9.3%+12.8% +11.4%
1 year +32.0%-7.1%+35.0% +13.1%
3 years +175.2%+327.3%+112.2% +79.4%
3 years, per year +40.2%+62.3%+28.5% +21.5%
5 years +242.3%+510.2%+9.7% +67.7%
5 years, per year +27.9%+43.6%+1.9% +10.9%
10 years +695.6%—+79.3% +255.2%
10 years, per year +23.0%—+6.0% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureCATHWMDANSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.4%34.9%44.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.9%36.4%45.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.831.081.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.79-0.200.79 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -35.5%-36.5%-69.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.5%-36.5%-31.2% -2.5%
52-week high $1,064.90$292.71$38.93 $779.14
52-week low $520.50$185.88$19.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCATHWMDAN
P/E now vs peer median 29.2xmedian 25.9x 39.8xmedian 26.2x 2.6xmedian 25.9x
P/S now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 1.9x 8.2xmedian 2.9x 0.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 22.9xmedian 13.7x 28.0xmedian 14.7x 6.9xmedian 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 35.1xmedian 21.1x 41.5xmedian 24.9x 20.2xmedian 21.1x
P/B now vs peer median 16.3xmedian 2.3x 13.0xmedian 2.4x 1.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.24median 1.19 0.73median 0.92 0.02median 1.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCATHWMDAN
Revenue $74.73B $9.12B $7.66B
Gross profit $25.66B $3.29B $725.00M
Operating income $13.09B $2.50B $210.00M
Net income $10.84B $1.87B $1.13B
Free cash flow $8.99B $1.79B $143.00M
R&D $2.27B $37.00M –
EPS (diluted) $23.45 $4.65 $10.18
Cash & equivalents $6.71B $563.00M $331.00M
Total debt $173.08B $20.67B $1.34B
Shares (diluted) 462.50M 402.00M 109.50M
Enterprise value $289.99B $73.31B $1.23B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCATHWMDAN
P/E 29.2x 39.8x 2.6x
P/FCF 35.1x 41.5x 20.2x
P/Operating cash flow 23.3x 33.5x 6.3x
P/S 4.2x 8.2x 0.4x
P/B 16.3x 13.0x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 16.6x 15.3x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 22.9x 28.0x 6.9x
EV/EBIT 27.1x 31.4x 18.6x
EV/Revenue 4.7x 8.6x 0.5x
EV/FCF 39.4x 43.7x 27.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.1x 35.3x 8.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.24 0.73 0.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCATHWMDAN
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.4% 18.1% 3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.9% 13.7% -9.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.7% 30.2% 79.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 25.3% -6.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.7% 32.6% 307.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.7% 34.8% 6.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 14.9% 33.9% 28,400%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 52.1% 83.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 17.1% 35.4% 6,201%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 13.0% 54.1% 108.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.3% 56.1% 49.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.6% 42.2% -8.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16.2% 75.9% 180.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.4% 45.6% 5.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCATHWMDAN
Gross margin 34.3% 36.0% 9.5%
EBITDA margin 20.7% 30.7% 7.3%
Operating margin 17.5% 27.4% 2.7%
Pretax margin 18.6% 25.0% 1.0%
Net margin 14.5% 20.5% 14.6%
FCF margin 12.0% 19.6% 1.9%
Operating cash flow margin 18.2% 24.4% 6.0%
Return on equity 57.0% 33.3% 56.6%
Return on assets 10.9% 14.2% 18.6%
Return on invested capital 15.9% 19.4% 0.0%
Return on capital employed 22.1% 23.0% 5.3%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.7x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.2x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.0% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCATHWMDAN
Debt / assets 44.0% 34.0% 22.0%
Debt / equity 2.3x 0.8x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 1.4x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 5.0x 2.5x 9.4x
Liabilities / assets 81.1% 56.7% 67.6%
Equity / assets 18.9% 43.3% 32.4%
Interest coverage 6.8x – 1.5x
Current ratio 1.4x 1.8x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 4.55 7.95 2.29

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCATHWMDAN
Dividend yield 0.7% 0.3% 1.7%
Net buyback yield 2.3% 1.3% 19.5%
Shareholder yield 3.0% 1.6% 21.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 25.9% 10.4% 4.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) 31.3% 10.9% 35.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.2% 30.0% -12.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 4.1% 47.3% -4.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCATHWMDAN
Forward P/E 26.6xFY2026 35.8xFY2026 14.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $25.79FY2026 $5.19FY2026 $1.90FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +35.3%FY2026 +37.7%FY2026 +413.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +31.4% +31.2% +128.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $84.12BFY2026 $10.37BFY2026 $8.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.5%FY2026 +25.7%FY2026 +7.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.5% +15.9% +34.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCATHWMDAN
Held by institutions 72.3% 91.0% 99.2%
Institutions holding 4,055 1,600 342
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.5% +0.7% +1.8%
Institutions buying 1,886 907 168
Institutions selling 1,595 484 126
Buyers to sellers 1.18 1.87 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CATHWMDAN
CAT 1.00 0.43 0.42
HWM 0.43 1.00 0.23
DAN 0.42 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CAT, HWM and DAN?

Caterpillar (CAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Caterpillar (CAT) $318.29B, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) $77.71B, Dana (DAN) $2.92B.

Which stock is cheaper, CAT, HWM and DAN?

Dana (DAN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Caterpillar (CAT) 29.4x, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 41.6x, Dana (DAN) 2.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dana (DAN) is cheapest (Caterpillar (CAT) 26.6x, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 35.8x, Dana (DAN) 14.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Caterpillar (CAT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Caterpillar (CAT) +18.4%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +18.1%, Dana (DAN) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) has the highest net margin (Caterpillar (CAT) 14.5%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 20.5%, Dana (DAN) 14.6%). On return on invested capital, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) leads (Caterpillar (CAT) 15.9%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 19.4%, Dana (DAN) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Dana (DAN) returned the most: Caterpillar (CAT) +32.0%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) -7.1%, Dana (DAN) +35.0%. Over five years, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) compounded fastest (Caterpillar (CAT) +27.9%/yr, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +43.6%/yr, Dana (DAN) +1.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Dana (DAN) has the highest dividend yield: Caterpillar (CAT) 0.01%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 0.00%, Dana (DAN) 0.02%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) has been the steadiest (Caterpillar (CAT) 40.4%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 34.9%, Dana (DAN) 44.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CAT, HWM and DAN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.