CART vs BKNG vs YMM Stock Comparison

Maplebear, Booking Holdings and Full Truck Alliance Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EXPE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CART Maplebear Inc.
$59.22 +29.7% 1M +62.4% 1Y
Market cap
$13.80B
P/E
29.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.99B
Div. yield
–
Digital Marketplaces Technology
2 wins
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc.
$170.97 +8.0% 1M -14.4% 1Y
Market cap
$127.15B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.13B
Div. yield
0.73%
Digital Marketplaces Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Full Truck Alliance leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Full Truck Alliance 5, Booking Holdings 3, Maplebear 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCARTBKNGYMMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.80B $127.15B $9.39B BKNG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 29.0x 17.9x 15.4x YMM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.1x 15.7x 12.0x YMM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.6% +8.0% — CART
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.0% 25.5% — BKNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 75.1% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.73% 2.66% YMM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +62.4% -14.4% -28.4% CART
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +10.3%/yr -8.4%/yr BKNG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.0% 39.4% 36.7% YMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 59/100 73/100 YMM

Percentile Scorecard

CARTBKNGYMM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCARTBKNGYMM
Valuation 47 #89 of 166 63 #62 of 166 85 #26 of 166
Growth 49 #79 of 154 34 #102 of 154 73 #43 of 154
Profitability 91 #15 of 154 99 #3 of 154 66 #53 of 154
Financial Health 74 #47 of 179 43 #103 of 179 94 #11 of 179
Shareholder Returns 89 #12 of 97 55 #44 of 97 48 #51 of 97
Overall 70 59 73
  • CART ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • BKNG ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • YMM ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCARTBKNGYMMSPY
1 month +29.7%+8.0%+7.1% -1.0%
3 months +30.6%-17.4%-5.6% -0.4%
6 months +47.5%+1.6%-0.8% +4.5%
Year to date +31.7%-20.2%-16.0% +12.4%
1 year +62.4%-14.4%-28.4% +13.6%
3 years +120.1%+49.5%+25.3% +76.4%
3 years, per year +30.1%+14.4%+7.8% +20.8%
5 years —+63.2%-35.5% +63.7%
5 years, per year —+10.3%-8.4% +10.4%
10 years —+200.1%— +267.7%
10 years, per year —+11.6%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureCARTBKNGYMMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.0%39.4%36.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.3%38.4%40.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.410.911.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.42-0.37-0.77 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.0%-39.5%-71.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.7%-22.2%-28.9% -1.6%
52-week high $60.88$219.68$12.68 $779.14
52-week low $32.93$147.94$7.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCARTBKNGYMM
P/E now vs peer median 29.0xmedian 18.2x 17.9xmedian 18.2x 15.4xmedian 18.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 1.5x 4.5xmedian 1.5x —median 1.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 15.3x 13.4xmedian 15.3x —median 15.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 12.2x 13.8xmedian 12.2x 9.4xmedian 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 1.8x -12.2xmedian 1.8x 1.6xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 27.31median 0.38 -0.30median 0.38 0.38median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCARTBKNGYMM
Revenue $3.99B $28.13B –
Gross profit $2.90B – –
Operating income $588.00M $9.22B $620.89M
Net income $480.00M $7.18B $671.27M
Free cash flow $1.18B $9.24B $1.00B
R&D $706.00M – $145.15M
EPS (diluted) $1.93 $9.53 $0.58
Cash & equivalents $757.00M $15.81B $1.00B
Total debt – $20.06B –
Shares (diluted) 248.94M 753.00M 1.05B
Enterprise value $9.84B $60.90B -$1.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCARTBKNGYMM
P/E 29.0x 17.9x 15.4x
P/FCF 11.7x 13.8x 9.4x
P/Operating cash flow 11.2x 13.3x 9.7x
P/S 3.5x 4.5x –
P/B 5.9x -12.2x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 6.1x -11.4x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 18.5x 13.4x –
EV/EBIT 22.0x 14.3x 9.5x
EV/Revenue 3.2x 4.7x –
EV/FCF 11.0x 14.2x 5.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.5x 13.7x 6.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 27.31 -0.30 0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCARTBKNGYMM
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.6% 8.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.3% 10.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.2% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.1% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.6% 8.2% 13.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.3% 11.9% 90.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -1.6% 42.3% 21.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -13.6% 10.6% 59.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 10.0% -93.8% 4.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.1% -59.9% 40.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 46.8% 10.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 51.0% 11.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCARTBKNGYMM
Gross margin 72.6% – –
EBITDA margin 17.6% 34.9% –
Operating margin 14.7% 32.8% –
Pretax margin 15.7% 32.9% –
Net margin 12.0% 25.5% –
FCF margin 29.5% 32.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 30.9% 34.0% –
Return on equity 20.4% – 10.3%
Return on assets 13.6% 24.8% 9.3%
Return on invested capital – 75.1% –
Return on capital employed 22.7% 96.0% 10.2%
Asset turnover 1.1x 1.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.6x 1.3x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 10.0% 2.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCARTBKNGYMM
Debt / assets – 71.0% –
Debt / equity – -1.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.4x –
Debt / FCF – 2.2x –
Liabilities / assets 33.8% 136.8% 10.4%
Equity / assets 66.2% -36.8% 89.6%
Interest coverage – 8.3x –
Current ratio 2.3x 1.1x 8.0x
Quick ratio 2.0x 1.0x 6.6x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.8x 6.6x
Altman Z-score 7.09 6.39 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCARTBKNGYMM
Dividend yield – 0.7% 2.7%
Net buyback yield 13.4% 9.5% –
Shareholder yield 13.4% 10.2% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCARTBKNGYMM
Forward P/E 24.1xFY2026 15.7xFY2026 12.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.46FY2026 $10.90FY2026 $0.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +53.7%FY2026 +19.5%FY2026 +15.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +14.2% +16.7% +6.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.00BFY2026 $27.56BFY2026 $1.97BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.1%FY2026 +2.4%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +25.3% +11.4% -4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCARTBKNGYMM
Held by institutions 82.5% 92.9% 71.1%
Institutions holding 502 1,920 247
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% -9.6% +3.0%
Institutions buying 246 894 168
Institutions selling 181 830 58
Buyers to sellers 1.36 1.08 2.90

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CARTBKNGYMM
CART 1.00 0.21 0.02
BKNG 0.21 1.00 0.23
YMM 0.02 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CART, BKNG and YMM?

Booking Holdings (BKNG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Maplebear (CART) $13.80B, Booking Holdings (BKNG) $127.15B, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) $9.39B.

Which stock is cheaper, CART, BKNG and YMM?

Full Truck Alliance (YMM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Maplebear (CART) 29.0x, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 17.9x, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 15.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) is cheapest (Maplebear (CART) 24.1x, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 15.7x, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 12.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Maplebear (CART) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Maplebear (CART) +12.6%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) +8.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Booking Holdings (BKNG) has the highest net margin (Maplebear (CART) 12.0%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 25.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Maplebear (CART) returned the most: Maplebear (CART) +62.4%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) -14.4%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -28.4%. Over five years, Booking Holdings (BKNG) compounded fastest (Booking Holdings (BKNG) +10.3%/yr, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) -8.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Full Truck Alliance (YMM) has the highest dividend yield: Booking Holdings (BKNG) 0.73%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 2.66%. Maplebear (CART) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) has been the steadiest (Maplebear (CART) 44.0%, Booking Holdings (BKNG) 39.4%, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) 36.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CART, BKNG and YMM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Full Truck Alliance (YMM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.