CARR vs CSW vs TT Stock Comparison

Carrier Global, Csw Industrials and Trane Technologies Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AOS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CARR CARRIER GLOBAL Corp
$55.18 +0.1% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$46.51B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$22.79B
Div. yield
0.02%
HVAC Industrials
2 wins
CSW Csw Industrials, Inc.
$286.89 -5.4% 1M +14.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.86B
P/E
38.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.25B
Div. yield
–
HVAC Industrials
1 win
TT Trane Technologies plc
$413.35 -10.9% 1M -7.9% 1Y
Market cap
$90.70B
P/E
28.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.23B
Div. yield
0.01%
HVAC Industrials
9 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Trane Technologies leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Trane Technologies 9, Carrier Global 2, Csw Industrials 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCARRCSWTTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $46.51B $4.86B $90.70B TT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -25.8x 38.1x 28.8x TT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.8x 21.5x 26.7x CARR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.3% — +10.3% TT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -7.9% — 13.6% TT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.6% — 25.7% TT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 52.2x — 0.7x TT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.01% CARR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.2% +14.6% -7.9% CSW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.2%/yr +16.0%/yr +18.3%/yr TT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.5% 43.7% 29.8% TT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 34/100 — 59/100 TT

Percentile Scorecard

CARRCSWTT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCARRCSWTT
Valuation 30 #39 of 55 – 15 #47 of 55
Growth 38 #32 of 51 – 74 #14 of 51
Profitability 16 #43 of 51 – 92 #5 of 51
Financial Health 16 #50 of 59 48 #31 of 59 59 #25 of 59
Shareholder Returns 70 #13 of 41 13 #36 of 41 55 #19 of 41
Overall 34 – 59
  • CARR ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • CSW ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • TT ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCARRCSWTTSPY
1 month +0.1%-5.4%-10.9% -2.3%
3 months -12.7%-16.6%-10.4% -0.7%
6 months -16.3%+3.1%-15.0% +4.8%
Year to date +4.4%-2.3%+6.2% +10.3%
1 year -7.2%+14.6%-7.9% +10.3%
3 years +9.2%+64.4%+89.6% +73.0%
3 years, per year +3.0%+18.0%+23.8% +20.1%
5 years +6.2%+109.8%+131.8% +61.9%
5 years, per year +1.2%+16.0%+18.3% +10.1%
10 years —+862.7%+691.9% +258.6%
10 years, per year —+25.4%+23.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCARRCSWTTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.5%43.7%29.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.6%44.0%31.8% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.251.401.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.200.33-0.26 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.4%-46.3%-40.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -27.4%-18.3%-17.9% -3.5%
52-week high $76.00$351.14$503.46 $779.14
52-week low $50.36$238.11$376.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCARRCSWTT
P/E now vs peer median -25.2xmedian 21.6x —median 21.6x 28.9xmedian 21.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.6x —median 1.6x 3.9xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 284.9xmedian 13.2x —median 13.2x 20.5xmedian 13.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.0xmedian 17.4x —median 17.4x 23.5xmedian 17.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 2.9x 4.9xmedian 2.9x 9.9xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.48median 1.00 —median 1.00 1.54median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCARRCSWTT
Revenue $22.79B $1.25B $23.23B
Gross profit $6.59B $528.34M $8.13B
Operating income -$1.09B $212.27M $4.16B
Net income -$1.73B $128.51M $3.18B
Free cash flow $2.38B $177.46M $3.86B
R&D $605.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $-2.19 $7.81 $14.23
Cash & equivalents $1.35B $37.20M $1.23B
Total debt $11.47B $764.56M $4.22B
Shares (diluted) 821.80M 16.33M 221.40M
Enterprise value $40.89B $4.71B $85.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCARRCSWTT
P/E -25.2x – 28.9x
P/FCF 19.0x – 23.5x
P/Operating cash flow 15.8x – 21.4x
P/S 2.0x – 3.9x
P/B 4.3x 4.9x 9.9x
P/Tangible book 9.2x 34.1x 16.0x
EV/EBITDA 284.9x – 20.5x
EV/EBIT -50.8x – 22.5x
EV/Revenue 2.4x – 4.0x
EV/FCF 23.2x – 24.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.3x – 22.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.48 – 1.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCARRCSWTT
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.3% – 10.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.1% – 10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.3% – 6.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 28.1% – 0.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -138.2% – 5.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -39.5% – 14.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -142.1% – 7.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -49.6% – 17.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -147.3% – 8.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -52.7% – 18.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 55.7% – 42.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.3% – 23.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 75.1% – 50.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.4% – 25.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCARRCSWTT
Gross margin 28.9% – 35.0%
EBITDA margin 0.9% – 19.7%
Operating margin -4.8% – 17.9%
Pretax margin -6.4% – 16.9%
Net margin -7.9% – 13.6%
FCF margin 10.4% – 16.6%
Operating cash flow margin 12.5% – 18.2%
Return on equity -14.0% – 35.7%
Return on assets -4.7% – 13.3%
Return on invested capital -4.6% – 25.7%
Return on capital employed -4.1% – 25.8%
Asset turnover 0.6x – 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.7x – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCARRCSWTT
Debt / assets 34.2% 37.5% 17.7%
Debt / equity 1.1x 0.8x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 52.2x – 0.7x
Debt / FCF 4.8x – 1.1x
Liabilities / assets 69.0% 54.7% 61.8%
Equity / assets 31.0% 45.3% 38.2%
Interest coverage – – 19.2x
Current ratio 1.0x 2.6x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.1x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 2.15 – 5.92

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCARRCSWTT
Dividend yield 1.7% 0.4% 1.0%
Net buyback yield 3.6% – 1.7%
Shareholder yield 5.3% 0.4% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) -45.6% – 28.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) 33.1% – 23.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) 6.5% – 10.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 10.1% – 10.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCARRCSWTT
Forward P/E 18.8xFY2026 21.5xFY2026 26.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.95FY2026 $13.00FY2026 $15.64FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.9%FY2026 +25.2%FY2026 +19.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.2% +12.4% +10.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $22.69BFY2026 $1.20BFY2026 $25.40BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.3%FY2026 +10.8%FY2026 +19.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.0% +7.0% +7.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCARRCSWTT
Held by institutions 87.4% 100.0% 87.0%
Institutions holding 1,630 360 1,812
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.0% -1.1% +0.3%
Institutions buying 807 164 895
Institutions selling 544 133 580
Buyers to sellers 1.48 1.23 1.54

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CARRCSWTT
CARR 1.00 0.50 0.66
CSW 0.50 1.00 0.38
TT 0.66 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CARR, CSW and TT?

Trane Technologies (TT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Carrier Global (CARR) $46.51B, Csw Industrials (CSW) $4.86B, Trane Technologies (TT) $90.70B.

Which stock is cheaper, CARR, CSW and TT?

Trane Technologies (TT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Carrier Global (CARR) -25.8x, Csw Industrials (CSW) 38.1x, Trane Technologies (TT) 28.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Carrier Global (CARR) is cheapest (Carrier Global (CARR) 18.8x, Csw Industrials (CSW) 21.5x, Trane Technologies (TT) 26.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Trane Technologies (TT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Carrier Global (CARR) +3.3%, Trane Technologies (TT) +10.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Trane Technologies (TT) has the highest net margin (Carrier Global (CARR) -7.9%, Trane Technologies (TT) 13.6%). On return on invested capital, Trane Technologies (TT) leads (Carrier Global (CARR) -4.6%, Trane Technologies (TT) 25.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Csw Industrials (CSW) returned the most: Carrier Global (CARR) -7.2%, Csw Industrials (CSW) +14.6%, Trane Technologies (TT) -7.9%. Over five years, Trane Technologies (TT) compounded fastest (Carrier Global (CARR) +1.2%/yr, Csw Industrials (CSW) +16.0%/yr, Trane Technologies (TT) +18.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Carrier Global (CARR) has the highest dividend yield: Carrier Global (CARR) 0.02%, Csw Industrials (CSW) 0.00%, Trane Technologies (TT) 0.01%. Csw Industrials (CSW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Trane Technologies (TT) has been the steadiest (Carrier Global (CARR) 35.5%, Csw Industrials (CSW) 43.7%, Trane Technologies (TT) 29.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CARR, CSW and TT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Trane Technologies (TT) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.