CAH vs MCK vs SKYA Stock Comparison

Cardinal Health, Mckesson and SkyAI Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GRDN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CAH Cardinal Health Inc
$251.10 +12.1% 1M +52.7% 1Y
Market cap
$59.13B
P/E
34.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$254.25B
Div. yield
0.01%
Drug Distribution Healthcare
5 wins
MCK Mckesson Corp
$981.33 +13.5% 1M +21.5% 1Y
Market cap
$118.07B
P/E
25.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$410.98B
Div. yield
0.00%
Drug Distribution Healthcare
5 wins
SKYA SkyAI, Inc.
$2.93 +60.1% 1M -40.9% 1Y
Market cap
$214.84M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$194.22K
Div. yield
–
Medical Supplies Healthcare
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Mckesson leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Mckesson 5, Cardinal Health 5, SkyAI 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCAHMCKSKYALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $59.13B $118.07B $214.84M MCK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 34.5x 25.7x -0.7x MCK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.9x 20.8x 0.0x SKYA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.2% +8.8% +108.9% SKYA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.7% 1.1% -158,431.4% MCK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 33.9% 107.9% — MCK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 0.6x — MCK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% CAH
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +52.7% +21.5% -40.9% CAH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +39.4%/yr +36.4%/yr — CAH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.5% 30.8% 105.8% CAH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 59/100 26/100 CAH

Percentile Scorecard

CAHMCKSKYA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCAHMCKSKYA
Valuation 75 #7 of 25 54 #12 of 25 2 #222 of 227
Growth 78 #6 of 24 65 #9 of 24 7 #203 of 218
Profitability 65 #9 of 24 70 #8 of 24 1 #200 of 202
Financial Health 40 #16 of 26 48 #14 of 26 94 #14 of 233
Shareholder Returns 80 #4 of 16 60 #7 of 16 –
Overall 68 59 26
  • CAH ranked among 27 companies in Healthcare Payers and Distributors
  • MCK ranked among 27 companies in Healthcare Payers and Distributors
  • SKYA ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCAHMCKSKYASPY
1 month +12.1%+13.5%+60.1% +0.7%
3 months +10.5%+13.3%+118.7% +3.7%
6 months +30.2%+20.4%+64.1% +7.1%
Year to date +22.2%+19.6%+44.3% +12.8%
1 year +52.7%+21.5%-40.9% +11.9%
3 years +175.8%+118.3%-99.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +40.3%+29.8%-90.2% +22.8%
5 years +425.2%+372.1%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +39.4%+36.4%— +10.9%
10 years +272.0%+690.7%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +14.0%+23.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCAHMCKSKYASPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.5%30.8%105.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.6%27.4%104.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.11-0.282.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.790.70-0.39 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -21.0%-27.2%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.5%-4.7%-40.9% -1.2%
52-week high $257.54$1,030.18$4.96 $779.14
52-week low $164.47$725.17$0.95 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCAHMCKSKYA
P/E now vs peer median 34.6xmedian 24.3x 25.4xmedian 24.3x -0.7xmedian 28.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.3x 0.3xmedian 0.3x 1,088xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.5xmedian 12.9x 16.4xmedian 12.9x —median 17.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 16.4x 17.8xmedian 16.4x —median 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median -20.3xmedian 2.5x -27.0xmedian 2.5x 1.3xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.50median 1.36 2.12median 1.36 0.01median 0.99

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCAHMCKSKYA
Revenue $254.25B $410.98B $194.22K
Gross profit $9.77B $14.96B $321.93K
Operating income $2.61B $6.50B -$289.52M
Net income $1.72B $5.30B -$307.71M
Free cash flow $4.53B $6.42B –
R&D – – $399.91K
EPS (diluted) $7.23 $38.52 $-4.27
Cash & equivalents $4.86B $5.16B $12.07M
Total debt $8.89B $9.73B –
Shares (diluted) 237.00M 119.20M 72.09M
Enterprise value $42.97B $101.97B $173.54M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCAHMCKSKYA
P/E 34.6x 25.4x -0.7x
P/FCF 12.9x 17.8x –
P/Operating cash flow 11.3x 16.7x –
P/S 0.2x 0.3x 1,088x
P/B -20.3x -27.0x 1.3x
P/Tangible book -20.3x -13.9x 16.3x
EV/EBITDA 17.5x 16.4x –
EV/EBIT 23.9x 18.3x -0.7x
EV/Revenue 0.2x 0.3x 1,025x
EV/FCF 13.8x 18.5x –
EV/Operating cash flow 12.1x 17.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.50 2.12 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCAHMCKSKYA
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.2% 8.8% 108.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.4% 13.1% 23.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.7% 11.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 12.3% 6.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 14.9% 46.6% -5,525%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 50.2% 13.5% -212.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.8% 58.1% -42,440%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 63.8% 10.7% -238.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.1% 52.8% -487.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 69.2% 12.0% -84.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 115.9% 4.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.1% 10.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 144.6% 6.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 24.2% 11.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCAHMCKSKYA
Gross margin 3.8% 3.6% 165.8%
EBITDA margin 1.4% 1.8% –
Operating margin 1.0% 1.6% -149,065%
Pretax margin 0.9% 1.6% -151,352%
Net margin 0.7% 1.1% -158,431%
FCF margin 1.8% 1.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 2.0% 1.7% –
Return on equity – – -140.2%
Return on assets 3.0% 6.2% -137.6%
Return on invested capital 33.9% 107.9% –
Return on capital employed 20.0% 43.4% -136.7%
Asset turnover 4.5x 4.8x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.0x 1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – 48,037%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCAHMCKSKYA
Debt / assets 15.5% 11.0% –
Debt / equity -3.1x -2.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 0.6x –
Debt / FCF 2.0x 1.5x –
Liabilities / assets 105.0% 104.8% 1.9%
Equity / assets -5.0% -4.8% 98.1%
Interest coverage 7.5x 23.6x –
Current ratio 0.9x 0.9x 5.3x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.5x 4.4x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 4.2x
Altman Z-score 5.11 5.90 31.69

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCAHMCKSKYA
Dividend yield 0.8% 0.3% –
Net buyback yield 2.3% 5.8% –
Shareholder yield 3.1% 6.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 28.5% 7.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 10.9% 6.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -0.6% 11.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -2.2% 10.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCAHMCKSKYA
Forward P/E 20.9xFY2027 20.8xFY2026 0.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $12.03FY2027 $47.15FY2026 $2,362.06FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.8%FY2027 +20.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +13.5% +11.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $272.90BFY2027 $444.47BFY2026 $70.01MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +7.3%FY2027 +10.2%FY2026 +34,200.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -3.5% +1.5% +17.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCAHMCKSKYA
Held by institutions 87.4% 89.1% –
Institutions holding 1,492 2,011 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% -0.7% –
Institutions buying 712 883 –
Institutions selling 556 791 –
Buyers to sellers 1.28 1.12 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CAHMCKSKYA
CAH 1.00 0.72 -0.09
MCK 0.72 1.00 -0.11
SKYA -0.09 -0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CAH, MCK and SKYA?

Mckesson (MCK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cardinal Health (CAH) $59.13B, Mckesson (MCK) $118.07B, SkyAI (SKYA) $214.84M.

Which stock is cheaper, CAH, MCK and SKYA?

Mckesson (MCK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cardinal Health (CAH) 34.5x, Mckesson (MCK) 25.7x, SkyAI (SKYA) -0.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, SkyAI (SKYA) is cheapest (Cardinal Health (CAH) 20.9x, Mckesson (MCK) 20.8x, SkyAI (SKYA) 0.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

SkyAI (SKYA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cardinal Health (CAH) +14.2%, Mckesson (MCK) +8.8%, SkyAI (SKYA) +108.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mckesson (MCK) has the highest net margin (Cardinal Health (CAH) 0.7%, Mckesson (MCK) 1.1%, SkyAI (SKYA) -158,431.4%). On return on invested capital, Mckesson (MCK) leads (Cardinal Health (CAH) 33.9%, Mckesson (MCK) 107.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cardinal Health (CAH) returned the most: Cardinal Health (CAH) +52.7%, Mckesson (MCK) +21.5%, SkyAI (SKYA) -40.9%. Over five years, Cardinal Health (CAH) compounded fastest (Cardinal Health (CAH) +39.4%/yr, Mckesson (MCK) +36.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Cardinal Health (CAH) has the highest dividend yield: Cardinal Health (CAH) 0.01%, Mckesson (MCK) 0.00%, SkyAI (SKYA) 0.00%. SkyAI (SKYA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cardinal Health (CAH) has been the steadiest (Cardinal Health (CAH) 29.5%, Mckesson (MCK) 30.8%, SkyAI (SKYA) 105.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CAH, MCK and SKYA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mckesson (MCK) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.