CAG vs UL vs MKC Stock Comparison

Conagra Brands, Unilever and Mccormick Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LW) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CAG Conagra Brands Inc.
$14.10 -0.1% 1M -18.9% 1Y
Market cap
$6.97B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$11.24B
Div. yield
–
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
1 win
UL Unilever Plc
$64.18 +4.8% 1M -6.4% 1Y
Market cap
$143.12B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$64.28B
Div. yield
–
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
4 wins
MKC Mccormick & Co Inc
$46.79 -3.3% 1M -26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$12.81B
P/E
8.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.69B
Div. yield
0.04%
Packaged Foods Consumer Staples
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Mccormick leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Mccormick 5, Unilever 4, Conagra Brands 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCAGULMKCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.97B $143.12B $12.81B UL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.7x — 8.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.4x 18.9x 16.0x CAG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.8% -2.6% +13.2% MKC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -17.0% — 19.4% MKC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -12.3% — 6.0% MKC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.9x — 3.6x MKC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.9% -6.4% -26.7% UL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.2%/yr +1.3%/yr -10.2%/yr UL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.8% 24.9% 31.4% UL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 20/100 71/100 MKC

Percentile Scorecard

CAGULMKC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCAGULMKC
Valuation 84 #8 of 45 2 #44 of 45 64 #17 of 45
Growth 5 #40 of 42 – 85 #7 of 42
Profitability 41 #24 of 40 – 87 #6 of 40
Financial Health 37 #30 of 47 41 #28 of 47 52 #23 of 47
Shareholder Returns 83 #6 of 31 17 #26 of 31 67 #11 of 31
Overall 50 20 71
  • CAG ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods
  • UL ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods
  • MKC ranked among 48 companies in Branded Foods

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCAGULMKCSPY
1 month -0.1%+4.8%-3.3% +0.7%
3 months -6.3%-1.7%-8.2% +3.7%
6 months -1.7%+8.8%-8.0% +7.1%
Year to date -18.5%-1.9%-31.3% +12.8%
1 year -18.9%-6.4%-26.7% +11.9%
3 years -48.2%+21.5%-26.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year -19.7%+6.7%-9.8% +22.8%
5 years -56.2%+6.5%-41.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year -15.2%+1.3%-10.2% +10.9%
10 years -62.3%+36.7%-1.9% +262.0%
10 years, per year -9.3%+3.2%-0.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCAGULMKCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.8%24.9%31.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.5%24.2%34.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.320.02-0.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.59-0.26-0.85 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.3%-26.2%-57.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.6%-14.0%-34.7% -1.2%
52-week high $20.02$74.59$71.65 $779.14
52-week low $12.58$55.05$44.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCAGULMKC
P/E now vs peer median -3.5xmedian 18.4x —median 18.4x 8.5xmedian 18.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 0.7x 2.2xmedian 0.7x 1.6xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 12.0x —median 12.0x 13.3xmedian 12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 13.6x —median 13.6x 13.6xmedian 13.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.6x 7.6xmedian 1.6x 1.7xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.06median 0.55 —median 0.55 0.26median 0.55

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCAGULMKC
Revenue $11.24B $64.28B $7.69B
Gross profit $2.68B – $3.00B
Operating income -$1.71B – $1.03B
Net income -$1.91B – $1.51B
Free cash flow $1.15B – $925.90M
EPS (diluted) $-3.97 – $5.53
Cash & equivalents $371.60M $5.40B $331.10M
Total debt $7.76B $27.38B $5.02B
Shares (diluted) 480.00M 2.20B 269.40M
Enterprise value $6.28B $94.58B $11.87B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCAGULMKC
P/E -3.5x – 8.5x
P/FCF 5.8x – 13.6x
P/Operating cash flow 5.3x – 11.0x
P/S 0.6x 2.2x 1.6x
P/B 1.1x 7.6x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 1.5x -89.7x 4.8x
EV/EBITDA 7.5x – 13.3x
EV/EBIT -8.3x – 16.8x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 2.4x 2.2x
EV/FCF 12.2x – 18.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.1x – 15.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.06 – 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCAGULMKC
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.8% -2.6% 13.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.9% 147.1% 5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -7.9% – 15.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -7.4% – 7.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) -230.3% – -3.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -39.7% – 3.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -324.3% – 93.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -55.6% – 32.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -324.1% – 91.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -55.5% – 32.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -17.3% – 29.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.8% – 2.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -17.4% – 41.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.2% – 5.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCAGULMKC
Gross margin 23.8% – 39.1%
EBITDA margin 16.8% – 17.0%
Operating margin -15.2% – 13.4%
Pretax margin -16.7% – 10.8%
Net margin -17.0% – 19.4%
FCF margin 10.3% – 12.0%
Operating cash flow margin 11.4% – 14.8%
Return on equity -29.9% – 19.0%
Return on assets -10.9% – 8.7%
Return on invested capital -12.3% – 6.0%
Return on capital employed -11.8% – 8.5%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.8x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.7x – 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCAGULMKC
Debt / assets 43.8% 31.2% 30.1%
Debt / equity 1.2x 1.5x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.9x – 3.6x
Debt / FCF 6.7x – 5.4x
Liabilities / assets 63.8% 79.0% 54.4%
Equity / assets 36.2% 21.0% 45.6%
Interest coverage – – 4.6x
Current ratio 1.1x 0.7x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 1.03 – 1.80

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCAGULMKC
Dividend yield 8.7% 3.3% 4.1%
Net buyback yield 0.9% – -0.1%
Shareholder yield 9.5% 3.3% 4.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 33.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 54.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 6.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 7.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCAGULMKC
Forward P/E 9.4xFY2026 18.9xFY2026 16.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.50FY2026 $3.40FY2026 $2.93FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -12.8%FY2026 -7.1%FY2026 -2.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -2.7% +7.9% +11.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.36BFY2026 $54.72BFY2026 $7.53BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -8.2%FY2026 -8.8%FY2026 +10.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.9% +7.8% +12.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCAGULMKC
Held by institutions 88.4% 11.8% 88.9%
Institutions holding 786 1,191 949
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.9% +7.2% +4.8%
Institutions buying 487 576 478
Institutions selling 207 441 343
Buyers to sellers 2.35 1.31 1.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CAGULMKC
CAG 1.00 0.44 0.58
UL 0.44 1.00 0.46
MKC 0.58 0.46 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CAG, UL and MKC?

Unilever (UL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Conagra Brands (CAG) $6.97B, Unilever (UL) $143.12B, Mccormick (MKC) $12.81B.

Which company is growing faster?

Mccormick (MKC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Conagra Brands (CAG) -1.8%, Unilever (UL) -2.6%, Mccormick (MKC) +13.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mccormick (MKC) has the highest net margin (Conagra Brands (CAG) -17.0%, Mccormick (MKC) 19.4%). On return on invested capital, Mccormick (MKC) leads (Conagra Brands (CAG) -12.3%, Mccormick (MKC) 6.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Unilever (UL) returned the most: Conagra Brands (CAG) -18.9%, Unilever (UL) -6.4%, Mccormick (MKC) -26.7%. Over five years, Unilever (UL) compounded fastest (Conagra Brands (CAG) -15.2%/yr, Unilever (UL) +1.3%/yr, Mccormick (MKC) -10.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Conagra Brands (CAG) 0.00%, Unilever (UL) 0.00%, Mccormick (MKC) 0.04%. Conagra Brands (CAG) and Unilever (UL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Unilever (UL) has been the steadiest (Conagra Brands (CAG) 31.8%, Unilever (UL) 24.9%, Mccormick (MKC) 31.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CAG, UL and MKC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mccormick (MKC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.