CAAP vs FER vs GTMAY Stock Comparison

Corporacion America Airports, Ferrovial and Grupo Tmm Sab Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FER Ferrovial N.V.
$50.35 -9.8% 1M -21.8% 1Y
Market cap
$38.80B
P/E
36.1x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
2 wins
GTMAY Grupo Tmm Sab
$3.28 +19.3% 1M +152.3% 1Y
Market cap
$572.53M
P/E
35.4x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Grupo Tmm Sab leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Grupo Tmm Sab 3, Ferrovial 2, Corporacion America Airports 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCAAPFERGTMAYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.84B $38.80B $572.53M FER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.1x 36.1x 35.4x CAAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.3x 47.1x 4.6x GTMAY
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.2% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.5% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.9x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +29.4% -21.8% +152.3% GTMAY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +33.1%/yr +11.4%/yr +36.6%/yr GTMAY
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.1% 25.4% 920.4% FER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 51/100 — CAAP

Percentile Scorecard

CAAPFERGTMAY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCAAPFERGTMAY
Valuation 38 #85 of 136 37 #33 of 52 6 #128 of 136
Growth 88 #16 of 122 – –
Profitability 61 #46 of 116 – –
Financial Health 23 #111 of 144 34 #38 of 57 57 #63 of 144
Shareholder Returns 57 #36 of 82 81 #6 of 27 –
Overall 53 51 –
  • CAAP ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • FER ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • GTMAY ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCAAPFERGTMAYSPY
1 month -0.1%-9.8%+19.3% -0.8%
3 months -9.3%-19.9%+19.3% +3.5%
6 months -3.8%-25.6%-3.5% +7.0%
Year to date -8.2%-22.1%+143.0% +12.2%
1 year +29.4%-21.8%+152.3% +13.0%
3 years +116.9%+54.9%+583.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +29.5%+15.7%+89.8% +23.1%
5 years +317.9%+71.3%+375.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year +33.1%+11.4%+36.6% +11.0%
10 years —+137.7%+71.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+9.0%+5.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCAAPFERGTMAYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.1%25.4%920.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.7%24.6%2,260.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.431.022.72 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.84-0.860.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -26.6%-34.3%-99.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.4%-32.3%-6.0% -1.8%
52-week high $30.35$74.38$3.49 $779.14
52-week low $21.62$48.86$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCAAPFERGTMAY
P/E now vs peer median 13.4xmedian 16.1x 36.1xmedian 25.7x 35.4xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 1.0x 3.3xmedian 0.8x 5.8xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 8.7x —median 12.9x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 11.5x 18.5xmedian 22.5x -31.7xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.2x 5.2xmedian 2.3x 4.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.70median 0.81 —median 0.56 —median 0.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCAAPFERGTMAY
Revenue $2.16B – –
Gross profit $745.77M – –
Operating income $523.99M – –
Net income $305.55M – –
Free cash flow $467.72M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.80 – –
Cash & equivalents $692.48M $5.02B $27.51M
Total debt $609.38B $12.25B $90.00M
Shares (diluted) 162.45M 718.72M –
Enterprise value $1.22B $17.05B $524.31M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCAAPFERGTMAY
P/E 13.4x 36.1x 35.4x
P/FCF 8.4x 18.5x -31.7x
P/Operating cash flow 8.3x – –
P/S 1.8x 3.3x 5.8x
P/B 2.0x 5.2x 4.3x
P/Tangible book -2.7x 5.3x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 1.9x – –
EV/EBIT 1,169x – –
EV/Revenue 283.4x – –
EV/FCF 1,310x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 1,291x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.70 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCAAPFERGTMAY
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.2% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.9% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 22.1% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 20.9% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.2% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 109.3% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.0% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 159.7% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.2% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 38.8% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 38.3% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 82.6% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCAAPFERGTMAY
Gross margin 34.5% – –
EBITDA margin 15,011% – –
Operating margin 24.2% – –
Pretax margin 18.6% – –
Net margin 13.5% – –
FCF margin 21.6% – –
Operating cash flow margin 22.0% – –
Return on equity 16.2% – –
Return on assets 6.4% – –
Return on invested capital 0.1% – –
Return on capital employed 12.9% – –
Asset turnover 0.4x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCAAPFERGTMAY
Debt / assets 12,511% 38.0% 23.0%
Debt / equity 314.7x 1.8x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.9x – –
Debt / FCF 1,303x – –
Liabilities / assets 60.2% 78.5% 47.5%
Equity / assets 39.8% 21.5% 52.5%
Interest coverage 0.0x – –
Current ratio 1.5x 1.1x 1.5x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.1x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.7x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 2.01 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCAAPFERGTMAY
Dividend yield 3.8% 2.6% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 3.8% 2.6% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCAAPFERGTMAY
Forward P/E 12.3xFY2026 47.1xFY2026 4.6xFY2023
EPS, next fiscal year $1.94FY2026 $1.07FY2026 $0.72FY2023
EPS growth, next FY +26.8%FY2026 -20.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +14.9% +12.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.18BFY2026 $11.77BFY2026 $97.26MFY2023
Revenue growth, next FY +11.4%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +7.7% -5.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCAAPFERGTMAY
Held by institutions 15.3% 33.2% –
Institutions holding 108 337 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.6% +17.5% –
Institutions buying 59 208 –
Institutions selling 35 103 –
Buyers to sellers 1.69 2.02 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CAAPFERGTMAY
CAAP 1.00 0.43 0.08
FER 0.43 1.00 -0.10
GTMAY 0.08 -0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CAAP, FER and GTMAY?

Ferrovial (FER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) $3.84B, Ferrovial (FER) $38.80B, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) $572.53M.

Which stock is cheaper, CAAP, FER and GTMAY?

Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 13.1x, Ferrovial (FER) 36.1x, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 35.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) is cheapest (Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 12.3x, Ferrovial (FER) 47.1x, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 4.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) returned the most: Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +29.4%, Ferrovial (FER) -21.8%, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) +152.3%. Over five years, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) compounded fastest (Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) +33.1%/yr, Ferrovial (FER) +11.4%/yr, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) +36.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrovial (FER) has been the steadiest (Corporacion America Airports (CAAP) 35.1%, Ferrovial (FER) 25.4%, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 920.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CAAP, FER and GTMAY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.