BWXT vs CCJ vs MIR Stock Comparison

BWX Technologies, Cameco and Mirion Technologies Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SHC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BWXT BWX Technologies, Inc.
$127.14 -10.4% 1M -36.4% 1Y
Market cap
$12.03B
P/E
33.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.51B
Div. yield
0.01%
Nuclear Equipment Industrials
5 wins
CCJ Cameco Corp
$78.61 -13.5% 1M -8.9% 1Y
Market cap
$34.44B
P/E
45.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.73B
Div. yield
–
Uranium Energy
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Cameco leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Cameco 5, BWX Technologies 5, Mirion Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBWXTCCJMIRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.03B $34.44B $3.65B CCJ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 33.9x 45.7x 148.8x BWXT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.3x 72.8x 28.5x BWXT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +22.7% +16.0% +15.7% BWXT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.1% 27.6% 2.4% CCJ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.6% — 2.0% BWXT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x -0.1x 0.1x CCJ
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -36.4% -8.9% -38.4% CCJ
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.0%/yr +24.9%/yr +6.6%/yr CCJ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.9% 54.5% 53.8% BWXT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 78/100 82/100 MIR

Percentile Scorecard

BWXTCCJMIR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBWXTCCJMIR
Valuation 60 #25 of 61 50 #12 of 23 72 #18 of 61
Growth 61 #23 of 58 95 #2 of 21 93 #5 of 58
Profitability 89 #7 of 55 100 #1 of 19 83 #10 of 55
Financial Health 41 #42 of 71 68 #8 of 23 73 #20 of 71
Shareholder Returns – – 87 #5 of 31
Overall 63 78 82
  • BWXT ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • CCJ ranked among 25 companies in Coal and Uranium
  • MIR ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBWXTCCJMIRSPY
1 month -10.4%-13.5%-9.5% -1.0%
3 months -27.2%-10.5%-10.5% +2.9%
6 months -43.0%-35.6%-24.8% +6.4%
Year to date -26.4%-14.1%-36.7% +11.4%
1 year -36.4%-8.9%-38.4% +13.1%
3 years +68.9%+102.6%+110.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year +19.1%+26.5%+28.2% +21.5%
5 years +118.8%+203.2%+37.3% +67.7%
5 years, per year +17.0%+24.9%+6.6% +10.9%
10 years +228.0%+877.7%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +12.6%+25.6%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBWXTCCJMIRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.9%54.5%53.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.5%50.0%57.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.932.352.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.81-0.16-0.71 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.7%-41.4%-52.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.7%-41.4%-50.2% -2.5%
52-week high $238.42$134.09$29.75 $779.14
52-week low $127.14$78.61$14.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBWXTCCJMIR
P/E now vs peer median 32.8xmedian 24.1x 45.4xmedian 26.9x 147.9xmedian 24.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.2x 12.5xmedian 6.7x 3.5xmedian 2.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 24.0xmedian 17.4x 42.5xmedian 11.7x 17.4xmedian 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 36.8xmedian 27.4x 44.5xmedian 10.2x 27.1xmedian 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 1.8x 6.8xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 1.99median 0.76 —median 47.24 5.41median 0.76

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBWXTCCJMIR
Revenue $3.51B $2.73B $1.02B
Gross profit $775.94M – $492.20M
Operating income $426.23M $649.76M $54.50M
Net income $355.38M $753.00M $25.60M
Free cash flow $316.76M – $133.70M
R&D $15.56M – $39.90M
EPS (diluted) $3.86 $1.73 $0.09
Cash & equivalents $608.20M $814.08M $418.70M
Total debt $7.08B $4.09B $445.30M
Shares (diluted) 92.01M 435.58M 275.07M
Enterprise value $10.33B $31.02B $1.48B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBWXTCCJMIR
P/E 32.8x 45.4x 147.9x
P/FCF 36.8x 44.5x 27.1x
P/Operating cash flow 22.4x – 21.0x
P/S 3.3x 12.5x 3.5x
P/B 8.7x 6.8x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 11.4x 6.8x 2.7x
EV/EBITDA 24.0x 42.5x 17.4x
EV/EBIT 30.6x 52.6x 67.0x
EV/Revenue 3.7x 12.5x 3.6x
EV/FCF 41.2x – 27.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 25.2x – 21.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.99 – 5.41

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBWXTCCJMIR
Revenue growth (1Y) 22.7% 16.0% 15.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.7% – 10.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.7% – 18.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.3% – 13.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.9% 40.9% 18.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 6.2% – 31.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 20.7% 156.7% 137.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 16.6% – 27.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 20.3% 218.3% 116.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 16.5% – 27.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 0.0% – 37.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.3% – 121.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -12.1% – 59.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 67.6% – 108.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBWXTCCJMIR
Gross margin 22.1% – 48.0%
EBITDA margin 15.5% 29.4% 20.5%
Operating margin 12.1% 23.8% 5.3%
Pretax margin 12.2% 16.4% 3.0%
Net margin 10.1% 27.6% 2.4%
FCF margin 9.0% – 13.0%
Operating cash flow margin 14.8% – 16.9%
Return on equity 27.2% – 1.4%
Return on assets 8.1% – 0.7%
Return on invested capital 10.6% – 2.0%
Return on capital employed 11.6% – 1.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x – 6.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% – 1.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBWXTCCJMIR
Debt / assets 45.7% 11.0% 12.6%
Debt / equity 1.5x 0.2x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x -0.1x 0.1x
Debt / FCF 6.4x – 3.3x
Liabilities / assets 69.8% 33.0% 46.7%
Equity / assets 30.2% 67.0% 53.3%
Interest coverage 12.4x 21.4x 36.3x
Current ratio 2.4x 2.5x 3.2x
Quick ratio 2.0x 1.5x 2.4x
Cash ratio 0.9x 1.1x 1.5x
Altman Z-score 4.49 9.60 1.67

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBWXTCCJMIR
Dividend yield 0.8% 0.3% –
Net buyback yield – – 1.1%
Shareholder yield 0.8% 0.3% 1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 27.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 30.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 5.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 5.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBWXTCCJMIR
Forward P/E 28.3xFY2026 72.8xFY2026 28.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.50FY2026 $1.08FY2026 $0.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.2%FY2026 +2.9%FY2026 +13.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +8.4% +73.1% +23.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.64BFY2026 $2.28BFY2026 $1.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.7%FY2026 -10.2%FY2026 +19.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.9% +15.7% +15.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBWXTCCJMIR
Held by institutions 92.2% 63.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 846 1,027 348
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.6% +4.0% +3.3%
Institutions buying 436 506 195
Institutions selling 280 341 116
Buyers to sellers 1.56 1.48 1.68

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BWXTCCJMIR
BWXT 1.00 0.59 0.58
CCJ 0.59 1.00 0.44
MIR 0.58 0.44 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BWXT, CCJ and MIR?

Cameco (CCJ) is the largest by market capitalisation: BWX Technologies (BWXT) $12.03B, Cameco (CCJ) $34.44B, Mirion Technologies (MIR) $3.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, BWXT, CCJ and MIR?

BWX Technologies (BWXT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (BWX Technologies (BWXT) 33.9x, Cameco (CCJ) 45.7x, Mirion Technologies (MIR) 148.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, BWX Technologies (BWXT) is cheapest (BWX Technologies (BWXT) 28.3x, Cameco (CCJ) 72.8x, Mirion Technologies (MIR) 28.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

BWX Technologies (BWXT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: BWX Technologies (BWXT) +22.7%, Cameco (CCJ) +16.0%, Mirion Technologies (MIR) +15.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cameco (CCJ) has the highest net margin (BWX Technologies (BWXT) 10.1%, Cameco (CCJ) 27.6%, Mirion Technologies (MIR) 2.4%). On return on invested capital, BWX Technologies (BWXT) leads (BWX Technologies (BWXT) 10.6%, Mirion Technologies (MIR) 2.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cameco (CCJ) returned the most: BWX Technologies (BWXT) -36.4%, Cameco (CCJ) -8.9%, Mirion Technologies (MIR) -38.4%. Over five years, Cameco (CCJ) compounded fastest (BWX Technologies (BWXT) +17.0%/yr, Cameco (CCJ) +24.9%/yr, Mirion Technologies (MIR) +6.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: BWX Technologies (BWXT) 0.01%, Cameco (CCJ) 0.00%, Mirion Technologies (MIR) 0.00%. Cameco (CCJ) and Mirion Technologies (MIR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, BWX Technologies (BWXT) has been the steadiest (BWX Technologies (BWXT) 44.9%, Cameco (CCJ) 54.5%, Mirion Technologies (MIR) 53.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BWXT, CCJ and MIR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cameco (CCJ) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.