BWMX vs NWL vs TTC Stock Comparison

Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V, Newell Brands and Toro Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
NWL Newell Brands Inc.
$5.48 -1.3% 1M +70.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.32B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.31B
Div. yield
0.05%
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
TTC Toro Co
$105.21 +6.4% 1M +42.2% 1Y
Market cap
$10.04B
P/E
27.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.75B
Div. yield
0.01%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V 5, Toro 4, Newell Brands 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBWMXNWLTTCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $618.25M $2.32B $10.04B TTC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.2x -7.2x 27.6x BWMX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.2x 7.6x 22.2x NWL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +28.1% +0.8% +5.2% BWMX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.1% -4.4% 7.6% BWMX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 29.4% 1.0% 16.4% BWMX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.0x 11.9x 1.2x TTC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.05% 0.01% NWL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.0% +70.2% +42.2% NWL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -8.1%/yr -25.7%/yr +1.3%/yr TTC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.0% 54.5% 25.9% TTC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 81/100 40/100 57/100 BWMX

Percentile Scorecard

BWMXNWLTTC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBWMXNWLTTC
Valuation 92 #5 of 50 44 #24 of 42 51 #100 of 204
Growth 88 #7 of 49 30 #29 of 41 55 #87 of 191
Profitability 98 #2 of 45 29 #28 of 39 89 #21 of 189
Financial Health 30 #38 of 54 9 #40 of 44 41 #132 of 221
Shareholder Returns 97 #2 of 30 89 #4 of 27 51 #79 of 159
Overall 81 40 57
  • BWMX ranked among 58 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • NWL ranked among 44 companies in Household Durables
  • TTC ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBWMXNWLTTCSPY
1 month +1.3%-1.3%+6.4% -5.9%
3 months -0.5%-9.0%+7.1% -4.6%
6 months -1.2%+23.1%+10.3% +0.2%
Year to date +16.5%+47.3%+33.7% +7.5%
1 year +16.0%+70.2%+42.2% +8.2%
3 years +26.7%-22.2%+25.4% +68.3%
3 years, per year +8.2%-8.0%+7.8% +19.0%
5 years -34.4%-77.3%+6.4% +56.5%
5 years, per year -8.1%-25.7%+1.3% +9.4%
10 years —-88.5%+122.7% +251.5%
10 years, per year —-19.4%+8.3% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureBWMXNWLTTCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.0%54.5%25.9% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.8%48.3%24.3% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.551.240.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.441.291.63 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.8%-88.1%-45.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.8%-13.8%-3.3% -5.9%
52-week high $19.44$6.36$108.82 $779.14
52-week low $13.56$3.11$67.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBWMXNWLTTC
P/E now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 17.9x -7.2xmedian 16.0x 27.6xmedian 23.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.7x 0.3xmedian 0.7x 2.1xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 14.3x 17.9xmedian 10.7x 16.9xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 17.4x 44.0xmedian 12.4x 14.0xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 1.9x 1.0xmedian 1.2x 7.5xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.53median 0.62 -0.42median 0.54 16.35median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBWMXNWLTTC
Revenue $926.97M $7.31B $4.75B
Gross profit $468.65M $2.60B $1.59B
Operating income $265.18M $72.00M $489.80M
Net income $76.07M -$323.00M $363.30M
Free cash flow $182.15M $53.00M $711.50M
EPS (diluted) $2.02 $-0.75 $3.80
Cash & equivalents $28.94M $249.00M $175.30M
Total debt $386.27M $4.84B $962.00M
Shares (diluted) 37.24M 430.20M 95.60M
Enterprise value $458.32M $1.46B $9.16B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBWMXNWLTTC
P/E 8.2x -7.2x 27.6x
P/FCF 3.4x 44.0x 14.0x
P/Operating cash flow 3.6x 9.2x 12.6x
P/S 0.7x 0.3x 2.1x
P/B 4.6x 1.0x 7.5x
P/Tangible book -5.3x 2.6x 11.1x
EV/EBITDA 5.5x 17.9x 16.9x
EV/EBIT 3.7x 96.2x 21.9x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 0.9x 2.3x
EV/FCF 5.4x 130.7x 15.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.7x 27.3x 13.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.53 -0.42 16.35

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBWMXNWLTTC
Revenue growth (1Y) 28.1% 0.8% 5.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.6% -4.3% 0.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -3.8% 5.3% 5.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.5% 3.7% -1.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 152.8% -77.5% 14.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 32.1% 30.2% 0.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 44.8% -1,246% 9.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 8.5% 16.3% -1.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 43.8% -1,225% 13.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 17.4% 1.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 99.6% 0.4% 34.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -1.0% -36.1% 38.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 104.0% 365.0% 44.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 68.6% -57.2% 79.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBWMXNWLTTC
Gross margin 50.6% 35.6% 33.4%
EBITDA margin 19.2% 5.3% 13.4%
Operating margin 28.6% 1.0% 10.3%
Pretax margin 13.6% -4.3% 9.7%
Net margin 8.1% -4.4% 7.6%
FCF margin 19.7% 0.7% 15.0%
Operating cash flow margin 18.5% 3.5% 16.6%
Return on equity 56.6% -13.4% 26.9%
Return on assets 9.0% -2.9% 10.0%
Return on invested capital 29.4% 1.0% 16.4%
Return on capital employed 49.9% 0.9% 19.1%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.7x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x -0.8x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.0% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBWMXNWLTTC
Debt / assets 47.0% 44.3% 27.2%
Debt / equity 2.9x 2.0x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.0x 11.9x 1.2x
Debt / FCF 2.1x 91.3x 1.4x
Liabilities / assets 83.6% 78.4% 62.2%
Equity / assets 16.4% 21.6% 37.8%
Interest coverage 6.2x – 8.7x
Current ratio 1.0x 1.3x 1.6x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.5x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 2.87 0.52 5.26

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBWMXNWLTTC
Dividend yield 8.0% 5.1% 1.5%
Net buyback yield – – 3.2%
Shareholder yield 8.0% 5.1% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -39.3% 41.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 239.6% 21.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.7% -0.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -20.2% 2.9%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBWMXNWLTTC
Forward P/E 8.2xFY2026 7.6xFY2026 22.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.03FY2026 $0.72FY2026 $4.73FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +31.0%FY2026 +26.3%FY2026 +12.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +22.7% -4.2% +15.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.00BFY2026 $6.89BFY2026 $4.56BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +26.5%FY2026 -4.3%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.4% +15.0% +3.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBWMXNWLTTC
Held by institutions 12.9% 100.0% 92.3%
Institutions holding 46 421 592
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.5% +9.2% +1.1%
Institutions buying 24 234 297
Institutions selling 14 124 194
Buyers to sellers 1.71 1.89 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BWMXNWLTTC
BWMX 1.00 0.09 0.13
NWL 0.09 1.00 0.36
TTC 0.13 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BWMX, NWL and TTC?

Toro (TTC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) $618.25M, Newell Brands (NWL) $2.32B, Toro (TTC) $10.04B.

Which stock is cheaper, BWMX, NWL and TTC?

Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) 8.2x, Newell Brands (NWL) -7.2x, Toro (TTC) 27.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Newell Brands (NWL) is cheapest (Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) 8.2x, Newell Brands (NWL) 7.6x, Toro (TTC) 22.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) +28.1%, Newell Brands (NWL) +0.8%, Toro (TTC) +5.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) has the highest net margin (Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) 8.1%, Newell Brands (NWL) -4.4%, Toro (TTC) 7.6%). On return on invested capital, Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) leads (Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) 29.4%, Newell Brands (NWL) 1.0%, Toro (TTC) 16.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Newell Brands (NWL) returned the most: Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) +16.0%, Newell Brands (NWL) +70.2%, Toro (TTC) +42.2%. Over five years, Toro (TTC) compounded fastest (Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) -8.1%/yr, Newell Brands (NWL) -25.7%/yr, Toro (TTC) +1.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Newell Brands (NWL) has the highest dividend yield: Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) 0.00%, Newell Brands (NWL) 0.05%, Toro (TTC) 0.01%. Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Toro (TTC) has been the steadiest (Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) 36.0%, Newell Brands (NWL) 54.5%, Toro (TTC) 25.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BWMX, NWL and TTC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Betterware De Mexico, S.A.P.I. De C.V (BWMX) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.