BWLP vs MUSA vs FGPR Stock Comparison

Bw Lpg, Murphy USA and Ferrellgas Partners L P Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SPH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BWLP BW LPG Ltd
$23.47 -8.4% 1M +74.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.43B
P/E
12.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$73.48M
Div. yield
–
Fuel Distribution Energy
6 wins
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.
$513.01 -0.4% 1M +43.2% 1Y
Market cap
$8.97B
P/E
13.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.26B
Div. yield
–
Convenience Stores Consumer Staples
2 wins
FGPR Ferrellgas Partners L P
$20.12 -10.3% 1M +11.3% 1Y
Market cap
$146.45M
P/E
2.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.86B
Div. yield
0.34%
Fuel Distribution Energy
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Bw Lpg leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Bw Lpg 6, Ferrellgas Partners L P 3, Murphy USA 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBWLPMUSAFGPRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.43B $8.97B $146.45M MUSA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.1x 13.5x 2.0x FGPR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 5.3x 14.3x — BWLP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +100.5% +20.2% -3.6% BWLP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 387.1% 2.9% 4.1% BWLP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.0% 25.2% 38.5% FGPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 1.6x 4.9x BWLP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.34% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +74.5% +43.2% +11.3% BWLP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +34.3%/yr +24.8%/yr -2.4%/yr BWLP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.9% 39.3% 36.8% FGPR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 62/100 45/100 MUSA

Percentile Scorecard

BWLPMUSAFGPR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBWLPMUSAFGPR
Valuation 41 #14 of 23 59 #17 of 40 68 #8 of 23
Growth 22 #15 of 19 81 #8 of 38 33 #13 of 19
Profitability 50 #10 of 19 86 #6 of 37 67 #7 of 19
Financial Health 75 #7 of 25 28 #29 of 40 13 #22 of 25
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 18 56 #13 of 28 –
Overall 58 62 45
  • BWLP ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • MUSA ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail
  • FGPR ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBWLPMUSAFGPRSPY
1 month -8.4%-0.4%-10.3% -2.3%
3 months +7.3%-13.3%-12.7% -0.7%
6 months +16.3%-13.5%-19.9% +4.8%
Year to date +79.2%+27.1%+9.3% +10.3%
1 year +74.5%+43.2%+11.3% +10.3%
3 years +57.0%+35.4%+157.9% +73.0%
3 years, per year +16.2%+10.6%+37.2% +20.1%
5 years +336.2%+202.3%-11.6% +61.9%
5 years, per year +34.3%+24.8%-2.4% +10.1%
10 years +645.1%+656.3%— +258.6%
10 years, per year +22.2%+22.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBWLPMUSAFGPRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.9%39.3%36.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.2%39.3%33.8% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.41-0.71-0.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.871.100.31 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.2%-35.8%-72.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.8%-17.7%-26.0% -3.5%
52-week high $26.31$623.43$27.20 $779.14
52-week low $11.99$356.57$17.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBWLPMUSAFGPR
P/E now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 8.6x 14.3xmedian 21.7x 1.6xmedian 8.6x
P/S now vs peer median 48.3xmedian 0.2x 0.4xmedian 0.5x 0.1xmedian 0.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 6.3x 9.0xmedian 9.7x 5.3xmedian 6.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 7.0x 14.1xmedian 15.2x 1.4xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.7x 11.9xmedian 2.8x -0.1xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.32 1.01median 1.01 -0.05median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBWLPMUSAFGPR
Revenue $73.48M $23.26B $1.86B
Gross profit – $2.71B $1.02B
Operating income $360.05M $980.10M $198.32M
Net income $504.96M $663.30M $71.83M
Free cash flow $721.10M $667.50M $75.35M
EPS (diluted) $1.87 $35.75 $9.80
Cash & equivalents $303.86M $161.80M $48.42M
Total debt $814.25M $2.19B $1.55B
Shares (diluted) 151.90M 18.55M 7.32M
Enterprise value $2.42B $8.45B -$125.82M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBWLPMUSAFGPR
P/E 12.5x 14.3x 1.6x
P/FCF 4.9x 14.1x 1.4x
P/Operating cash flow 9.6x 8.2x 0.7x
P/S 48.3x 0.4x 0.1x
P/B 1.7x 11.9x -0.1x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 14.4x -0.1x
EV/EBITDA 2.3x 9.0x 5.3x
EV/EBIT 11.3x 11.7x 8.1x
EV/Revenue 55.3x 0.5x 0.9x
EV/FCF 5.6x 17.1x 18.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.9x 9.9x 9.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.01 -0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBWLPMUSAFGPR
Revenue growth (1Y) 100.5% 20.2% -3.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 2.1% -3.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 16.9% 0.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.9% 1.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.0% 38.4% 106.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 7.8% -7.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 86.9% 40.8% 847.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 8.1% -19.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -68.3% 45.9% 575.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 14.1% -32.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -32.7% 40.6% -8.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.1% -1.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -37.3% 81.8% -25.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 16.0% 3.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBWLPMUSAFGPR
Gross margin – 11.7% 55.1%
EBITDA margin 2,384% 5.5% 16.1%
Operating margin 490.0% 4.2% 10.5%
Pretax margin 466.8% 3.7% 4.2%
Net margin 387.1% 2.9% 4.1%
FCF margin 981.4% 2.9% 4.7%
Operating cash flow margin 505.4% 4.9% 9.1%
Return on equity 24.8% 84.1% –
Return on assets 15.0% 12.9% 5.1%
Return on invested capital 13.0% 25.2% 38.5%
Return on capital employed 13.4% 24.7% 17.0%
Asset turnover 0.0x 4.5x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.7x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBWLPMUSAFGPR
Debt / assets 24.0% 42.2% 105.2%
Debt / equity 0.4x 2.8x -1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 1.6x 4.9x
Debt / FCF 1.1x 3.3x 17.8x
Liabilities / assets 39.4% 84.7% 172.8%
Equity / assets 60.6% 15.3% -72.8%
Interest coverage 3.8x 8.5x 1.7x
Current ratio 1.4x 0.9x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 2.36 7.63 1.76

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBWLPMUSAFGPR
Dividend yield 89.1% 0.5% –
Net buyback yield – 4.0% –
Shareholder yield 89.1% 4.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBWLPMUSAFGPR
Forward P/E 5.3xFY2026 14.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.57FY2026 $35.60FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +290.6%FY2026 +43.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -59.3% -7.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.20BFY2026 $22.85BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +69.7%FY2026 +17.9%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -31.6% -5.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBWLPMUSAFGPR
Held by institutions – 83.0% 0.0%
Institutions holding – 608 1
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.2% –
Institutions buying – 312 0
Institutions selling – 190 0
Buyers to sellers – 1.64 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BWLPMUSAFGPR
BWLP 1.00 0.14 -0.04
MUSA 0.14 1.00 -0.01
FGPR -0.04 -0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BWLP, MUSA and FGPR?

Murphy USA (MUSA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bw Lpg (BWLP) $3.43B, Murphy USA (MUSA) $8.97B, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) $146.45M.

Which stock is cheaper, BWLP, MUSA and FGPR?

Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 12.1x, Murphy USA (MUSA) 13.5x, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 2.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bw Lpg (BWLP) is cheapest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 5.3x, Murphy USA (MUSA) 14.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bw Lpg (BWLP) +100.5%, Murphy USA (MUSA) +20.2%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) has the highest net margin (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 387.1%, Murphy USA (MUSA) 2.9%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 4.1%). On return on invested capital, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) leads (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 13.0%, Murphy USA (MUSA) 25.2%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 38.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bw Lpg (BWLP) returned the most: Bw Lpg (BWLP) +74.5%, Murphy USA (MUSA) +43.2%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) +11.3%. Over five years, Bw Lpg (BWLP) compounded fastest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) +34.3%/yr, Murphy USA (MUSA) +24.8%/yr, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -2.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bw Lpg (BWLP) 0.00%, Murphy USA (MUSA) 0.00%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 0.34%. Bw Lpg (BWLP) and Murphy USA (MUSA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) has been the steadiest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 39.9%, Murphy USA (MUSA) 39.3%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 36.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BWLP, MUSA and FGPR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bw Lpg (BWLP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.