BWLP vs ET vs MUSA Stock Comparison

Bw Lpg, Energy Transfer and Murphy USA Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GLP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BWLP BW LPG Ltd
$21.64 -15.5% 1M +59.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.28B
P/E
11.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$73.48M
Div. yield
96.67%
Fuel Distribution Energy
8 wins
ET Energy Transfer LP
$19.20 -7.3% 1M +13.5% 1Y
Market cap
$66.13B
P/E
12.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$124.53B
Div. yield
7.02%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
3 wins
MUSA Murphy USA Inc.
$515.15 +0.4% 1M +40.8% 1Y
Market cap
$9.32B
P/E
14.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.26B
Div. yield
0.63%
Convenience Stores Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Bw Lpg leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Bw Lpg 8, Energy Transfer 3, Murphy USA 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBWLPETMUSALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.28B $66.13B $9.32B ET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.5x 12.6x 14.3x BWLP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.3x 10.5x 14.3x BWLP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +100.5% +56.1% +20.2% BWLP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 387.1% 4.2% 2.9% BWLP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.0% 8.8% 25.2% MUSA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 3.8x 1.6x BWLP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 96.67% 7.02% 0.63% BWLP
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +59.9% +13.5% +40.8% BWLP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +30.6%/yr +15.6%/yr +24.4%/yr BWLP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.8% 17.9% 39.3% ET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 66/100 62/100 ET

Percentile Scorecard

BWLPETMUSA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBWLPETMUSA
Valuation 46 #13 of 23 94 #3 of 35 59 #17 of 40
Growth 22 #15 of 19 82 #7 of 34 78 #9 of 38
Profitability 44 #11 of 19 36 #22 of 34 86 #6 of 37
Financial Health 67 #9 of 25 50 #18 of 35 28 #29 of 40
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 19 70 #10 of 31 59 #12 of 28
Overall 56 66 62
  • BWLP ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • MUSA ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBWLPETMUSASPY
1 month -15.5%-7.3%+0.4% -5.9%
3 months +0.3%-7.1%-3.8% -4.6%
6 months +7.1%-3.6%-11.3% +0.2%
Year to date +65.2%+16.4%+27.7% +7.5%
1 year +59.9%+13.5%+40.8% +8.2%
3 years +42.1%+42.1%+37.6% +68.3%
3 years, per year +12.4%+12.4%+11.2% +19.0%
5 years +280.3%+106.5%+197.4% +56.5%
5 years, per year +30.6%+15.6%+24.4% +9.4%
10 years +587.0%+39.1%+718.5% +251.5%
10 years, per year +21.3%+3.4%+23.4% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureBWLPETMUSASPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.8%17.9%39.3% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.7%17.7%39.4% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.41-0.18-0.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.470.761.04 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.2%-25.8%-35.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.7%-11.7%-17.4% -5.9%
52-week high $26.31$21.74$623.43 $779.14
52-week low $11.99$16.21$356.57 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBWLPETMUSA
P/E now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 8.0x 12.6xmedian 17.6x 14.3xmedian 20.2x
P/S now vs peer median 44.6xmedian 0.3x 0.5xmedian 2.4x 0.4xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 4.9x 7.6xmedian 10.4x 8.9xmedian 9.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 4.9x 10.9xmedian 15.0x 14.0xmedian 15.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.6x 1.3xmedian 2.3x 11.7xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.34 0.98median 0.98 1.02median 1.03

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBWLPETMUSA
Revenue $73.48M $124.53B $23.26B
Gross profit – $26.50B $2.71B
Operating income $360.05M $11.41B $980.10M
Net income $504.96M $7.56B $663.30M
Free cash flow $721.10M $6.08B $667.50M
EPS (diluted) $1.87 $1.51 $35.75
Cash & equivalents $303.86M $926.00M $161.80M
Total debt $814.25M $68.85B $2.19B
Shares (diluted) 151.90M 3.47B 18.55M
Enterprise value $2.40B $62.23B $8.81B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBWLPETMUSA
P/E 11.5x 12.6x 14.3x
P/FCF 4.5x 10.9x 14.0x
P/Operating cash flow 8.8x 4.9x 8.1x
P/S 44.6x 0.5x 0.4x
P/B 1.6x 1.3x 11.7x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 1.6x 14.2x
EV/EBITDA 2.2x 7.6x 8.9x
EV/EBIT 10.5x 11.7x 11.5x
EV/Revenue 51.5x 1.1x 0.5x
EV/FCF 5.2x 22.0x 17.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.2x 9.9x 9.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.98 1.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBWLPETMUSA
Revenue growth (1Y) 100.5% 56.1% 20.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 16.6% 2.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 23.1% 16.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 14.3% 5.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.0% 23.7% 38.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.9% 7.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 86.9% 27.7% 40.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 13.5% 8.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -68.3% 20.9% 45.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 13.0% 14.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -32.7% 25.2% 40.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 12.2% 16.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -37.3% 17.2% 81.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% 16.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBWLPETMUSA
Gross margin – 21.3% 11.7%
EBITDA margin 2,384% 14.2% 5.5%
Operating margin 490.0% 9.2% 4.2%
Pretax margin 466.8% 6.6% 3.7%
Net margin 387.1% 4.2% 2.9%
FCF margin 981.4% 4.9% 2.9%
Operating cash flow margin 505.4% 10.9% 4.9%
Return on equity 24.8% 15.1% 84.1%
Return on assets 15.0% 5.1% 12.9%
Return on invested capital 13.0% 8.8% 25.2%
Return on capital employed 13.4% 8.9% 24.7%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.8x 4.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.8x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% 0.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBWLPETMUSA
Debt / assets 24.0% 46.1% 42.2%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.4x 2.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 3.8x 1.6x
Debt / FCF 1.1x 11.3x 3.3x
Liabilities / assets 39.4% 66.8% 84.7%
Equity / assets 60.6% 33.2% 15.3%
Interest coverage 3.8x 3.1x 8.5x
Current ratio 1.4x 1.2x 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.9x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 2.23 – 7.61

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBWLPETMUSA
Dividend yield 96.7% 7.0% 0.6%
Net buyback yield – 2.1% 4.0%
Shareholder yield 96.7% 9.1% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 63.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 79.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBWLPETMUSA
Forward P/E 4.3xFY2026 10.5xFY2026 14.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.02FY2026 $1.83FY2026 $36.14FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +329.1%FY2026 +51.2%FY2026 +45.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -59.0% -10.4% -10.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.27BFY2026 $127.15BFY2026 $23.88BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +78.9%FY2026 +48.6%FY2026 +23.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -31.7% +2.0% -2.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBWLPETMUSA
Held by institutions – 31.4% 83.0%
Institutions holding – 1,284 609
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.9% -2.2%
Institutions buying – 630 313
Institutions selling – 342 190
Buyers to sellers – 1.84 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BWLPETMUSA
BWLP 1.00 0.22 0.13
ET 0.22 1.00 0.24
MUSA 0.13 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BWLP, ET and MUSA?

Energy Transfer (ET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bw Lpg (BWLP) $3.28B, Energy Transfer (ET) $66.13B, Murphy USA (MUSA) $9.32B.

Which stock is cheaper, BWLP, ET and MUSA?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 11.5x, Energy Transfer (ET) 12.6x, Murphy USA (MUSA) 14.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bw Lpg (BWLP) is cheapest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 4.3x, Energy Transfer (ET) 10.5x, Murphy USA (MUSA) 14.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bw Lpg (BWLP) +100.5%, Energy Transfer (ET) +56.1%, Murphy USA (MUSA) +20.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) has the highest net margin (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 387.1%, Energy Transfer (ET) 4.2%, Murphy USA (MUSA) 2.9%). On return on invested capital, Murphy USA (MUSA) leads (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 13.0%, Energy Transfer (ET) 8.8%, Murphy USA (MUSA) 25.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bw Lpg (BWLP) returned the most: Bw Lpg (BWLP) +59.9%, Energy Transfer (ET) +13.5%, Murphy USA (MUSA) +40.8%. Over five years, Bw Lpg (BWLP) compounded fastest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) +30.6%/yr, Energy Transfer (ET) +15.6%/yr, Murphy USA (MUSA) +24.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) has the highest dividend yield: Bw Lpg (BWLP) 96.67%, Energy Transfer (ET) 7.02%, Murphy USA (MUSA) 0.63%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Transfer (ET) has been the steadiest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 40.8%, Energy Transfer (ET) 17.9%, Murphy USA (MUSA) 39.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BWLP, ET and MUSA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bw Lpg (BWLP) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.