BWLP vs CPK vs CETY Stock Comparison

Bw Lpg, Chesapeake Utilities and Clean Energy Technologies Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SUN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BWLP BW LPG Ltd
$23.47 -8.4% 1M +74.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.55B
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$73.48M
Div. yield
89.14%
Fuel Distribution Energy
9 wins
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corp
$139.39 +9.4% 1M +9.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.36B
P/E
22.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$993.50M
Div. yield
2.03%
Regulated Electric Utilities Utilities
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Bw Lpg leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Bw Lpg 9, Chesapeake Utilities 2, Clean Energy Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBWLPCPKCETYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.55B $3.36B $10.83M BWLP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.5x 22.3x -1.6x BWLP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 5.1x 22.3x — BWLP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +100.5% +14.6% +89.4% BWLP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 387.1% 15.1% -258.7% BWLP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.0% 6.6% -30.7% BWLP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 4.7x -2.8x CETY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 89.14% 2.03% — BWLP
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +74.5% +9.5% -60.6% BWLP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +34.3%/yr +0.9%/yr — BWLP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 39.9% 20.2% 141.6% CPK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 67/100 18/100 CPK

Percentile Scorecard

BWLPCPKCETY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBWLPCPKCETY
Valuation 41 #14 of 23 36 #43 of 67 13 #54 of 62
Growth 22 #15 of 19 97 #3 of 65 17 #49 of 59
Profitability 50 #10 of 19 73 #18 of 65 15 #47 of 55
Financial Health 75 #7 of 25 62 #26 of 66 25 #54 of 72
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 18 65 #24 of 67 –
Overall 58 67 18
  • BWLP ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing
  • CPK ranked among 67 companies in Regulated Utilities
  • CETY ranked among 72 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBWLPCPKCETYSPY
1 month -8.4%+9.4%-9.2% -2.3%
3 months +7.3%+4.1%-6.3% -0.7%
6 months +16.3%+10.2%+18.7% +4.8%
Year to date +79.2%+11.7%+21.9% +10.3%
1 year +74.5%+9.5%-60.6% +10.3%
3 years +57.0%+50.4%-96.6% +73.0%
3 years, per year +16.2%+14.6%-67.7% +20.1%
5 years +336.2%+4.4%— +61.9%
5 years, per year +34.3%+0.9%— +10.1%
10 years +645.1%+124.1%— +258.6%
10 years, per year +22.2%+8.4%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBWLPCPKCETYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 39.9%20.2%141.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.2%20.9%124.1% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.41-0.250.83 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.870.47-0.43 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.2%-40.5%-99.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.8%0.0%-61.6% -3.5%
52-week high $26.31$139.39$2.32 $779.14
52-week low $11.99$118.97$0.46 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBWLPCPKCETY
P/E now vs peer median 12.5xmedian 8.6x 22.3xmedian 20.9x -1.6xmedian 29.1x
P/S now vs peer median 48.3xmedian 0.2x 3.4xmedian 2.9x 4.1xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 6.3x 13.9xmedian 13.3x -12.3xmedian 18.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 7.0x -17.4xmedian 41.3x -1.3xmedian 28.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.7x 2.0xmedian 1.8x 1.8xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.32 2.83median 2.15 0.28median 0.81

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBWLPCPKCETY
Revenue $73.48M $993.50M $2.64M
Gross profit – $669.70M -$36.28K
Operating income $360.05M $271.10M -$2.89M
Net income $504.96M $150.20M -$6.83M
Free cash flow $721.10M -$193.50M -$8.05M
EPS (diluted) $1.87 $6.21 $-0.56
Cash & equivalents $303.86M $400.00K $19.74K
Total debt $814.25M $1.69B $3.19M
Shares (diluted) 151.90M 24.17M 12.17M
Enterprise value $2.67B $3.35B $9.10M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBWLPCPKCETY
P/E 12.5x 22.3x -1.6x
P/FCF 4.9x -17.4x -1.3x
P/Operating cash flow 9.6x 10.9x -1.3x
P/S 48.3x 3.4x 4.1x
P/B 1.7x 2.0x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 2.0x 1.9x
EV/EBITDA 2.3x 13.9x -12.3x
EV/EBIT 11.3x 18.6x -4.8x
EV/Revenue 55.3x 5.1x 5.3x
EV/FCF 5.6x -26.1x -1.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.9x 16.4x -1.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.83 0.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBWLPCPKCETY
Revenue growth (1Y) 100.5% 14.6% 89.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 13.9% -8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 11.3% -103.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -27.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.0% 10.7% -8.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 23.2% -12.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 86.9% 16.4% -69.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 19.4% -79.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -68.3% 12.7% 48.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 7.9% -5.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -32.7% 45.9% -130.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 18.7% -30.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -37.3% 3.2% -130.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -102.6% -30.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBWLPCPKCETY
Gross margin – 67.4% -1.4%
EBITDA margin 2,384% 36.5% -43.2%
Operating margin 490.0% 27.3% -109.4%
Pretax margin 466.8% 20.8% -258.7%
Net margin 387.1% 15.1% -258.7%
FCF margin 981.4% -19.5% -304.9%
Operating cash flow margin 505.4% 31.0% -304.9%
Return on equity 24.8% 9.0% -106.7%
Return on assets 15.0% 3.6% -49.9%
Return on invested capital 13.0% 6.6% -30.7%
Return on capital employed 13.4% 7.7% -47.3%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 2.1x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBWLPCPKCETY
Debt / assets 24.0% 40.4% 22.9%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.0x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 4.7x -2.8x
Debt / FCF 1.1x -8.7x -0.4x
Liabilities / assets 39.4% 59.9% 57.0%
Equity / assets 60.6% 40.1% 43.0%
Interest coverage 3.8x 3.7x -0.7x
Current ratio 1.4x 0.3x 1.0x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.2x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 2.36 1.37 -3.40

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBWLPCPKCETY
Dividend yield 89.1% 2.0% –
Net buyback yield – -2.3% –
Shareholder yield 89.1% -0.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 42.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -33.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 11.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 19.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBWLPCPKCETY
Forward P/E 5.1xFY2026 22.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.57FY2026 $6.24FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +290.6%FY2026 +3.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -59.3% +15.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.20BFY2026 $1.09BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +69.7%FY2026 +17.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -31.6% +4.7% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBWLPCPKCETY
Held by institutions – 92.3% –
Institutions holding – 334 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +4.2% –
Institutions buying – 188 –
Institutions selling – 99 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.90 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BWLPCPKCETY
BWLP 1.00 -0.07 0.05
CPK -0.07 1.00 0.03
CETY 0.05 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BWLP, CPK and CETY?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bw Lpg (BWLP) $3.55B, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) $3.36B, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) $10.83M.

Which stock is cheaper, BWLP, CPK and CETY?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 12.5x, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 22.3x, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) -1.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bw Lpg (BWLP) is cheapest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 5.1x, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 22.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bw Lpg (BWLP) +100.5%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +14.6%, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) +89.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) has the highest net margin (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 387.1%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 15.1%, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) -258.7%). On return on invested capital, Bw Lpg (BWLP) leads (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 13.0%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 6.6%, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) -30.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bw Lpg (BWLP) returned the most: Bw Lpg (BWLP) +74.5%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +9.5%, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) -60.6%. Over five years, Bw Lpg (BWLP) compounded fastest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) +34.3%/yr, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +0.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Bw Lpg (BWLP) has the highest dividend yield: Bw Lpg (BWLP) 89.14%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 2.03%. Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) has been the steadiest (Bw Lpg (BWLP) 39.9%, Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 20.2%, Clean Energy Technologies (CETY) 141.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BWLP, CPK and CETY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bw Lpg (BWLP) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.