BWIN vs NP vs RYAN Stock Comparison

Baldwin Insurance, Neptune Insurance Holdings and Ryan Specialty Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (HGTY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Ryan Specialty Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ryan Specialty Holdings 4, Baldwin Insurance 3, Neptune Insurance Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBWINNPRYANLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.96B $4.05B $5.36B RYAN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -20.5x 90.6x 54.2x RYAN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.9x 50.8x 18.3x BWIN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4,094.7% +33.8% +14.4% BWIN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 22.7% 3.1% NP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 512.4% 8.7% NP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 4.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +33.0% +15.6% -20.8% BWIN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.1%/yr — +2.6%/yr RYAN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.7% 60.7% 45.1% RYAN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 39/100 35/100 NP

Percentile Scorecard

BWINNPRYAN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBWINNPRYAN
Valuation 1 #118 of 119 3 #116 of 119 7 #111 of 119
Growth 15 #97 of 114 79 #25 of 114 55 #52 of 114
Profitability – 100 #1 of 110 49 #57 of 110
Financial Health – 10 #99 of 110 3 #107 of 110
Shareholder Returns – 4 #102 of 106 64 #39 of 106
Overall – 39 35
  • BWIN ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • NP ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • RYAN ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBWINNPRYANSPY
1 month +0.2%+7.0%+11.9% -0.2%
3 months +11.5%-7.4%-7.9% +3.9%
6 months +34.5%+10.7%+22.0% +8.2%
Year to date +32.8%+1.1%-17.9% +12.9%
1 year +33.0%+15.6%-20.8% +12.3%
3 years +51.3%—-6.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year +14.8%—-2.1% +23.3%
5 years -14.7%—+13.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year -3.1%—+2.6% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureBWINNPRYANSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.7%60.7%45.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.3%56.0%47.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.020.12-0.33 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.560.26-0.46 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.2%-43.8%-61.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.3%-15.9%-27.4% -1.2%
52-week high $32.00$35.05$58.38 $779.14
52-week low $16.50$17.14$29.39 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBWINNPRYAN
P/E now vs peer median -20.5xmedian 10.5x 90.5xmedian 10.5x 53.6xmedian 10.5x
P/S now vs peer median 9.1xmedian 1.4x 20.5xmedian 1.4x 3.4xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.6x —median 7.6x 18.8xmedian 7.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 101.4xmedian 8.5x 49.3xmedian 8.5x 22.0xmedian 8.5x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.5x -19.1xmedian 1.5x 10.7xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -6.17median 0.53 —median 0.53 -12.20median 0.53

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBWINNPRYAN
Revenue $490.48M $197.00M $3.22B
Operating income – $81.30M $477.27M
Net income – $44.74M $242.82M
Free cash flow – $82.04M $492.78M
EPS (diluted) $-1.55 $0.31 $0.75
Cash & equivalents – $17.43M $140.12M
Total debt – $922.00M $3.63B
Shares (diluted) 92.76M 146.39M 131.33M
Enterprise value $2.96B $4.00B $4.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBWINNPRYAN
P/E -20.5x 90.5x 53.6x
P/FCF 101.4x 49.3x 22.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 49.3x 19.4x
P/S 9.1x 20.5x 3.4x
P/B – -19.1x 10.7x
P/Tangible book – -19.1x 12.2x
EV/EBITDA – – 18.8x
EV/EBIT – 52.2x 30.0x
EV/Revenue 9.1x 21.5x 4.5x
EV/FCF – 51.7x 29.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 51.7x 25.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -6.17 – -12.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBWINNPRYAN
Revenue growth (1Y) 4,095% 33.8% 14.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -20.7% – 19.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 7.0% -1.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 12.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – 0.1% 26.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 7.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -279.2% 197.9% 271.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.3% – -4.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 53.1% -2.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 21.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 53.1% -3.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 18.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBWINNPRYAN
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 23.7%
Operating margin – 41.3% 14.8%
Pretax margin – 34.1% 8.8%
Net margin – 22.7% 3.1%
FCF margin – 41.6% 15.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 41.6% 17.4%
Return on equity – – 21.7%
Return on assets – 43.4% 2.1%
Return on invested capital – 512.4% 8.7%
Return on capital employed – 3,191% 9.9%
Asset turnover – 1.9x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.8x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 16.2% 2.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBWINNPRYAN
Debt / assets – 206.9% 30.4%
Debt / equity – -1.0x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 4.6x
Debt / FCF – 2.6x 7.4x
Liabilities / assets – 303.6% 91.5%
Equity / assets – -203.6% 8.5%
Interest coverage – 5.4x –
Current ratio – 0.9x 1.0x
Quick ratio – 0.3x 0.1x
Cash ratio – 0.2x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – 5.68 1.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBWINNPRYAN
Dividend yield – – 1.2%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% 2.8%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 4.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 27.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 13.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 13.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 65.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBWINNPRYAN
Forward P/E 14.9xFY2026 50.8xFY2026 18.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.14FY2026 $0.58FY2026 $2.31FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +28.1%FY2026 +41.5%FY2026 +17.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +20.6% +25.9% +10.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.08BFY2026 $195.39MFY2026 $3.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +38.8%FY2026 +22.5%FY2026 +1.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.6% +18.6% +10.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBWINNPRYAN
Held by institutions 93.3% 71.7% 45.6%
Institutions holding 229 136 369
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.2% +3.3% +5.0%
Institutions buying 112 105 198
Institutions selling 76 24 134
Buyers to sellers 1.47 4.38 1.48

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BWINNPRYAN
BWIN 1.00 0.16 0.35
NP 0.16 1.00 0.21
RYAN 0.35 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BWIN, NP and RYAN?

Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) $2.96B, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) $4.05B, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) $5.36B.

Which stock is cheaper, BWIN, NP and RYAN?

Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) -20.5x, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 90.6x, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 54.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) is cheapest (Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) 14.9x, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 50.8x, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 18.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) +4,094.7%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) +33.8%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) +14.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) has the highest net margin (Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 22.7%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 3.1%). On return on invested capital, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) leads (Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 512.4%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 8.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) returned the most: Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) +33.0%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) +15.6%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) -20.8%. Over five years, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) compounded fastest (Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) -3.1%/yr, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) +2.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) 0.00%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 0.00%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 0.01%. Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) and Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) has been the steadiest (Baldwin Insurance (BWIN) 58.7%, Neptune Insurance Holdings (NP) 60.7%, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) 45.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BWIN, NP and RYAN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ryan Specialty Holdings (RYAN) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.