BSX vs LMAT vs DXCM Stock Comparison

Boston Scientific, Lemaitre Vascular and Dexcom Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (STE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BSX Boston Scientific Corp
$42.68 -2.8% 1M -57.4% 1Y
Market cap
$61.64B
P/E
17.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.07B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
4 wins
LMAT Lemaitre Vascular Inc
$85.27 +2.9% 1M -4.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.85B
P/E
28.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$262.43M
Div. yield
0.01%
Medical Devices Healthcare
3 wins
DXCM Dexcom Inc
$79.93 -7.7% 1M +17.2% 1Y
Market cap
$30.81B
P/E
31.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.10B
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Boston Scientific leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Boston Scientific 4, Lemaitre Vascular 3, Dexcom 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSXLMATDXCMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $61.64B $1.85B $30.81B BSX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.6x 28.1x 31.1x BSX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.7x 28.9x 28.2x BSX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.9% +11.8% +13.0% DXCM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 25.0% 19.4% LMAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -57.4% -4.1% +17.2% DXCM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.2%/yr +10.4%/yr -12.5%/yr LMAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.3% 46.2% 40.7% BSX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 82/100 75/100 LMAT

Percentile Scorecard

BSXLMATDXCM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSXLMATDXCM
Valuation 86 #32 of 227 74 #60 of 227 70 #69 of 227
Growth 71 #64 of 218 89 #26 of 218 82 #40 of 218
Profitability – 96 #9 of 202 99 #3 of 202
Financial Health – 89 #26 of 233 34 #155 of 233
Shareholder Returns – 64 #48 of 130 88 #16 of 130
Overall – 82 75
  • BSX ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • LMAT ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • DXCM ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSXLMATDXCMSPY
1 month -2.8%+2.9%-7.7% +0.7%
3 months -7.2%-16.6%+7.2% +3.7%
6 months -25.9%-22.3%+34.2% +7.1%
Year to date -55.2%+5.1%+20.4% +12.8%
1 year -57.4%-4.1%+17.2% +11.9%
3 years -14.7%+78.0%-5.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year -5.2%+21.2%-2.0% +22.8%
5 years -1.0%+63.9%-48.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year -0.2%+10.4%-12.5% +10.9%
10 years +93.2%+295.1%+317.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year +6.8%+14.7%+15.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBSXLMATDXCMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.3%46.2%40.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.8%53.2%40.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.130.420.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.43-0.090.42 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.6%-33.5%-66.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -59.3%-27.4%-13.4% -1.2%
52-week high $104.98$117.39$92.34 $779.14
52-week low $41.57$78.80$54.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSXLMATDXCM
P/E now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 28.7x 29.7xmedian 28.7x 30.2xmedian 28.7x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 3.0x 7.4xmedian 3.0x 5.8xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.8x 17.7xmedian 17.8x 18.7xmedian 17.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 26.4x 26.4xmedian 26.4x 27.1xmedian 26.4x
P/B now vs peer median —median 2.4x 4.6xmedian 2.4x 11.8xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.41median 0.99 0.88median 0.99 0.70median 0.99

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSXLMATDXCM
Revenue $21.07B $262.43M $5.10B
Gross profit $14.57B $191.31M $3.24B
Operating income $3.93B $77.32M $1.22B
Net income – $65.67M $991.00M
Free cash flow – $73.83M $1.10B
R&D $2.16B $15.41M $608.10M
EPS (diluted) $2.37 $2.68 $2.58
Cash & equivalents – $26.63M $961.40M
Shares (diluted) 1.47B 24.53M 383.50M
Enterprise value $61.64B $402.19M $22.63B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSXLMATDXCM
P/E 17.9x 29.7x 30.2x
P/FCF 17.6x 26.4x 27.1x
P/Operating cash flow – 23.5x 21.1x
P/S 2.9x 7.4x 5.8x
P/B – 4.6x 11.8x
P/Tangible book – 5.0x 12.2x
EV/EBITDA – 17.7x 18.7x
EV/EBIT – 20.4x 22.9x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 6.0x 5.5x
EV/FCF – 21.3x 25.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – 19.0x 19.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.41 0.88 0.70

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSXLMATDXCM
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.9% 11.8% 13.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.3% 14.0% 14.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 9.8% 18.0% 21.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.1% 18.8% 14.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.5% 41.2% 57.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.1% 36.4% 34.2%
Net income growth (1Y) – 39.4% 37.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 37.6% 38.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 27.2% 30.1% 46.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 43.2% 33.6% 43.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 41.2% -2.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 48.0% 23.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 41.1% 3.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 57.4% 30.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSXLMATDXCM
Gross margin – 72.9% 63.4%
EBITDA margin – 33.8% 29.4%
Operating margin – 29.5% 24.0%
Pretax margin – 32.3% 24.7%
Net margin – 25.0% 19.4%
FCF margin – 28.1% 21.5%
Operating cash flow margin – 31.6% 27.7%
Return on equity – 15.9% 38.4%
Return on assets – 10.3% 15.6%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – 12.8% 29.9%
Asset turnover – 0.4x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.3x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.0% 3.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSXLMATDXCM
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets – 34.4% 59.4%
Equity / assets – 65.6% 40.6%
Interest coverage – 14.9x –
Current ratio – 16.3x 1.7x
Quick ratio – 13.8x 1.3x
Cash ratio – 12.6x 0.8x
Altman Z-score – 7.43 7.32

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSXLMATDXCM
Dividend yield – 1.1% –
Net buyback yield – -0.3% 2.3%
Shareholder yield – 0.8% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 31.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 27.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 26.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 20.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSXLMATDXCM
Forward P/E 13.7xFY2026 28.9xFY2026 28.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.12FY2026 $2.95FY2026 $2.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +2.0%FY2026 +17.1%FY2026 +35.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +14.7% +12.9% +4.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $20.67BFY2026 $266.90MFY2026 $5.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.0%FY2026 +6.9%FY2026 +9.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.6% +19.4% +16.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSXLMATDXCM
Held by institutions 90.5% 99.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,482 327 976
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.7% +2.8% +6.3%
Institutions buying 739 172 521
Institutions selling 610 98 344
Buyers to sellers 1.21 1.76 1.51

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSXLMATDXCM
BSX 1.00 0.27 0.27
LMAT 0.27 1.00 0.28
DXCM 0.27 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSX, LMAT and DXCM?

Boston Scientific (BSX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Boston Scientific (BSX) $61.64B, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) $1.85B, Dexcom (DXCM) $30.81B.

Which stock is cheaper, BSX, LMAT and DXCM?

Boston Scientific (BSX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Boston Scientific (BSX) 17.6x, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 28.1x, Dexcom (DXCM) 31.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Boston Scientific (BSX) is cheapest (Boston Scientific (BSX) 13.7x, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 28.9x, Dexcom (DXCM) 28.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Dexcom (DXCM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Boston Scientific (BSX) +8.9%, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) +11.8%, Dexcom (DXCM) +13.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) has the highest net margin (Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 25.0%, Dexcom (DXCM) 19.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Dexcom (DXCM) returned the most: Boston Scientific (BSX) -57.4%, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) -4.1%, Dexcom (DXCM) +17.2%. Over five years, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) compounded fastest (Boston Scientific (BSX) -0.2%/yr, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) +10.4%/yr, Dexcom (DXCM) -12.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Boston Scientific (BSX) 0.00%, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 0.01%, Dexcom (DXCM) 0.00%. Boston Scientific (BSX) and Dexcom (DXCM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Boston Scientific (BSX) has been the steadiest (Boston Scientific (BSX) 40.3%, Lemaitre Vascular (LMAT) 46.2%, Dexcom (DXCM) 40.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSX, LMAT and DXCM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Boston Scientific (BSX) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.