BSM vs ET vs VNOM Stock Comparison

Black Stone Minerals, Energy Transfer and Viper Energy Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LB) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ET Energy Transfer LP
$19.51 -5.4% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$67.18B
P/E
13.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38B
Div. yield
6.91%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
8 wins
VNOM Viper Energy, Inc.
$41.06 +0.5% 1M +11.9% 1Y
Market cap
$14.62B
P/E
134.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.04B
Div. yield
3.97%
Oil and Gas Royalties Energy
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Energy Transfer leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Energy Transfer 8, Black Stone Minerals 3, Viper Energy 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSMETVNOMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.09B $67.18B $14.62B ET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.4x 13.3x 134.8x ET
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.8x 10.8x 15.3x ET
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.0% +33.3% +107.8% VNOM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 41.2% 4.7% 2.9% BSM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.4% 1.4% ET
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 4.0x 1.5x BSM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 8.41% 6.91% 3.97% BSM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +8.7% +17.9% +11.9% ET
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.6%/yr +16.0%/yr — ET
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 20.4% 18.0% 29.4% ET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 59/100 43/100 ET

Percentile Scorecard

BSMETVNOM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSMETVNOM
Valuation 22 #77 of 98 94 #3 of 35 23 #76 of 98
Growth 24 #74 of 97 52 #17 of 34 28 #70 of 97
Profitability 93 #8 of 94 30 #24 of 34 47 #50 of 94
Financial Health 72 #29 of 101 50 #18 of 35 83 #18 of 101
Shareholder Returns 27 #57 of 78 70 #10 of 31 35 #51 of 78
Overall 47 59 43
  • BSM ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • VNOM ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSMETVNOMSPY
1 month -1.2%-5.4%+0.5% -1.0%
3 months -0.5%-4.0%-0.9% -0.4%
6 months +6.9%-1.8%-13.9% +4.5%
Year to date +9.1%+18.3%+6.3% +12.4%
1 year +8.7%+17.9%+11.9% +13.6%
3 years -21.0%+42.8%— +76.4%
3 years, per year -7.6%+12.6%— +20.8%
5 years +19.2%+109.8%— +63.7%
5 years, per year +3.6%+16.0%— +10.4%
10 years -14.9%+41.4%— +267.7%
10 years, per year -1.6%+3.5%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureBSMETVNOMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 20.4%18.0%29.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 22.2%17.6%31.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.27-0.25-0.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.431.000.40 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.7%-25.8%-36.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.1%-10.3%-19.4% -1.6%
52-week high $15.44$21.74$50.95 $779.14
52-week low $13.15$16.21$35.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSMETVNOM
P/E now vs peer median 14.4xmedian 10.7x 13.3xmedian 18.1x 134.8xmedian 10.7x
P/S now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 1.7x 0.6xmedian 2.5x 7.2xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.1xmedian 5.4x 8.0xmedian 10.7x 15.2xmedian 5.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.7xmedian 9.9x 12.9xmedian 15.1x 73.9xmedian 9.9x
P/B now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 1.4x 1.3xmedian 2.4x 1.4xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median -0.67median 0.68 1.91median 1.65 —median 0.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSMETVNOM
Revenue $521.46M $107.38B $2.04B
Gross profit – $25.32B –
Operating income $257.78M $10.78B $251.00M
Net income $244.23M $7.04B $103.00M
Free cash flow $209.59M $5.22B $198.00M
R&D $23.81M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.01 $1.46 $0.30
Cash & equivalents $5.49M $1.02B $77.00M
Total debt $201.12M $68.41B $1.68B
Shares (diluted) 212.71M 3.46B 193.73M
Enterprise value $3.07B $60.62B $19.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSMETVNOM
P/E 14.4x 13.3x 134.8x
P/FCF 14.7x 12.9x 73.9x
P/Operating cash flow 9.6x 5.5x 9.8x
P/S 5.9x 0.6x 7.2x
P/B 3.9x 1.3x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 3.9x 1.5x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 11.1x 8.0x 15.2x
EV/EBIT 12.7x 12.5x 64.6x
EV/Revenue 6.3x 1.3x 7.9x
EV/FCF 15.7x 25.8x 81.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.2x 11.1x 10.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.67 1.91 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSMETVNOM
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.0% 33.3% 107.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.0% 10.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 18.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -8.3% 16.5% -56.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -17.6% 12.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) -10.9% 16.1% -83.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -18.9% 9.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) -12.5% 12.6% -89.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -21.4% 7.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -3.9% 8.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -15.9% 5.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -9.1% -8.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -27.0% -7.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSMETVNOM
Gross margin – 23.6% –
EBITDA margin 56.9% 15.7% 52.3%
Operating margin 49.4% 10.0% 12.3%
Pretax margin 46.8% 7.1% 7.6%
Net margin 41.2% 4.7% 2.9%
FCF margin 40.2% 4.9% 9.7%
Operating cash flow margin 61.9% 11.3% 73.2%
Return on equity 30.4% 14.0% 1.0%
Return on assets 17.8% 4.8% 0.9%
Return on invested capital – 8.4% 1.4%
Return on capital employed 19.5% 8.4% 2.1%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.7x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.7x 14.5x
Stock comp / revenue 2.2% 0.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSMETVNOM
Debt / assets 14.6% 46.2% 13.9%
Debt / equity 0.3x 1.4x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 4.0x 1.5x
Debt / FCF 1.0x 13.1x 8.5x
Liabilities / assets 42.4% 65.9% 14.7%
Equity / assets 57.6% 34.1% 85.3%
Interest coverage 18.5x 2.9x –
Current ratio 1.8x 1.2x 6.4x
Quick ratio 2.8x 0.9x 6.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.8x
Altman Z-score – – 5.20

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSMETVNOM
Dividend yield 8.4% 6.9% 4.0%
Net buyback yield 0.1% – 2.8%
Shareholder yield 8.5% 6.9% 6.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 118.1% 67.9% 413.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) 137.7% 91.6% 215.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) -12.7% 2.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -11.4% 8.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSMETVNOM
Forward P/E 13.8xFY2026 10.8xFY2026 15.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.05FY2026 $1.80FY2026 $2.69FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.0%FY2026 +48.8%FY2026 +62.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +3.8% -9.4% +2.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $448.02MFY2026 $124.23BFY2026 $2.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -4.7%FY2026 +45.2%FY2026 +83.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.6% +1.4% +2.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSMETVNOM
Held by institutions 21.1% 31.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 198 1,284 497
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.4% +1.9% +5.4%
Institutions buying 82 630 265
Institutions selling 44 342 150
Buyers to sellers 1.86 1.84 1.77

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSMETVNOM
BSM 1.00 0.35 0.51
ET 0.35 1.00 0.50
VNOM 0.51 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSM, ET and VNOM?

Energy Transfer (ET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Black Stone Minerals (BSM) $3.09B, Energy Transfer (ET) $67.18B, Viper Energy (VNOM) $14.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, BSM, ET and VNOM?

Energy Transfer (ET) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Black Stone Minerals (BSM) 14.4x, Energy Transfer (ET) 13.3x, Viper Energy (VNOM) 134.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Energy Transfer (ET) is cheapest (Black Stone Minerals (BSM) 13.8x, Energy Transfer (ET) 10.8x, Viper Energy (VNOM) 15.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Viper Energy (VNOM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Black Stone Minerals (BSM) +5.0%, Energy Transfer (ET) +33.3%, Viper Energy (VNOM) +107.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Black Stone Minerals (BSM) has the highest net margin (Black Stone Minerals (BSM) 41.2%, Energy Transfer (ET) 4.7%, Viper Energy (VNOM) 2.9%). On return on invested capital, Energy Transfer (ET) leads (Energy Transfer (ET) 8.4%, Viper Energy (VNOM) 1.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Energy Transfer (ET) returned the most: Black Stone Minerals (BSM) +8.7%, Energy Transfer (ET) +17.9%, Viper Energy (VNOM) +11.9%. Over five years, Energy Transfer (ET) compounded fastest (Black Stone Minerals (BSM) +3.6%/yr, Energy Transfer (ET) +16.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Black Stone Minerals (BSM) has the highest dividend yield: Black Stone Minerals (BSM) 8.41%, Energy Transfer (ET) 6.91%, Viper Energy (VNOM) 3.97%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Transfer (ET) has been the steadiest (Black Stone Minerals (BSM) 20.4%, Energy Transfer (ET) 18.0%, Viper Energy (VNOM) 29.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSM, ET and VNOM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Energy Transfer (ET) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.