BSBR vs UWMC vs WFC Stock Comparison

Banco Santander (Brasil), UWM Holdings and Wells Fargo & Company Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.48 +18.4% 1M -73.8% 1Y
Market cap
$507.98M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
1 win
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$84.81 +5.4% 1M -1.4% 1Y
Market cap
$255.32B
P/E
11.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
0.02%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
8 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Wells Fargo & Company leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Wells Fargo & Company 8, Banco Santander (Brasil) 1, UWM Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSBRUWMCWFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.08B $507.98M $255.32B WFC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -13.7x 11.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.7x 7.8x 10.8x BSBR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +26.1% +5.4% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -1.0% 25.2% WFC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.3% 15.1% WFC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 10.6x 2.8x WFC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.2% -73.8% -1.4% WFC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.6%/yr -26.3%/yr +10.6%/yr WFC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.3% 80.1% 25.6% WFC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 35/100 51/100 WFC

Percentile Scorecard

BSBRUWMCWFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSBRUWMCWFC
Valuation – 19 #138 of 169 47 #191 of 361
Growth – 16 #134 of 159 53 #73 of 153
Profitability – 31 #101 of 146 65 #45 of 128
Financial Health 33 #94 of 140 17 #127 of 153 13 #122 of 140
Shareholder Returns 99 #3 of 335 94 #9 of 135 78 #74 of 335
Overall – 35 51
  • BSBR ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • WFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSBRUWMCWFCSPY
1 month -19.5%+18.4%+5.4% +0.7%
3 months -9.7%-20.9%-0.7% +3.7%
6 months -22.0%-58.2%+3.1% +7.1%
Year to date -25.2%-66.2%-9.0% +12.8%
1 year -18.2%-73.8%-1.4% +11.9%
3 years -13.1%-69.6%+115.1% +85.2%
3 years, per year -4.6%-32.8%+29.1% +22.8%
5 years -25.2%-78.2%+65.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year -5.6%-26.3%+10.6% +10.9%
10 years -42.2%—+83.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year -5.3%—+6.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBSBRUWMCWFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.3%80.1%25.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.3%89.7%29.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.211.470.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.48-0.92-0.05 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.2%-89.5%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.5%-75.7%-12.0% -1.2%
52-week high $7.20$6.10$96.39 $779.14
52-week low $4.55$1.00$73.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSBRUWMCWFC
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.2x -13.4xmedian 11.7x 11.6xmedian 12.2x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 2.9xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.3x 15.1xmedian 13.1x 6.1xmedian 5.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.8x -0.5xmedian 6.5x 8.8xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.34 0.26median 0.33 0.81median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSBRUWMCWFC
Revenue – $3.58B $87.23B
Net income – -$104.96M $22.97B
Free cash flow – -$4.92B $28.91B
EPS (diluted) – $-0.11 $7.20
Cash & equivalents $5.42B $498.41M –
Total debt $15.65B $19.23B $221.04B
Shares (diluted) 3.93B 337.53M 3.05B
Enterprise value -$330.95B -$1.79B $255.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSBRUWMCWFC
P/E – -13.4x 11.6x
P/FCF – -0.5x 8.8x
P/Operating cash flow – -0.5x 8.8x
P/S – 0.7x 2.9x
P/B 1.4x 2.4x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.9x -0.5x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – 15.1x 6.1x
EV/EBIT – 17.0x 6.7x
EV/Revenue – 2.2x 5.5x
EV/FCF – -1.6x 16.5x
EV/Operating cash flow – -1.6x 16.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.26 0.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSBRUWMCWFC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 26.1% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 27.3% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – -175.0% 9.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -31.9% 6.8%
EPS growth (1Y) – -287.6% 16.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -51.2% 14.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -103.1% 303.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -18.2% -0.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -100.4% 303.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -18.4% -0.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSBRUWMCWFC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 14.6% 89.8%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – -3.2% 31.7%
Net margin – -1.0% 25.2%
FCF margin – -137.6% 33.1%
Operating cash flow margin – -135.9% 33.1%
Return on equity – -8.1% 12.9%
Return on assets – -0.6% 1.0%
Return on invested capital – 6.3% 15.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 46.3x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSBRUWMCWFC
Debt / assets 6.3% 33.5% 9.8%
Debt / equity 0.6x 6.1x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – 10.6x 2.8x
Debt / FCF – -1.2x 7.6x
Liabilities / assets 90.1% 94.5% 92.1%
Equity / assets 9.9% 5.5% 7.9%
Interest coverage – 0.8x 1.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSBRUWMCWFC
Dividend yield 9.2% 20.3% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – – 5.5%
Shareholder yield 9.2% 20.3% 7.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 24.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 19.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 5.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 6.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSBRUWMCWFC
Forward P/E 6.7xFY2026 7.8xFY2026 10.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.68FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $7.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.1%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.9% +26.3% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.93BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026 $94.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.4%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.6% +37.3% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSBRUWMCWFC
Held by institutions 14.6% 17.0% 76.8%
Institutions holding 88 291 2,879
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +31.8% +1.1%
Institutions buying 52 214 1,293
Institutions selling 24 50 1,135
Buyers to sellers 2.17 4.28 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSBRUWMCWFC
BSBR 1.00 0.14 0.27
UWMC 0.14 1.00 0.11
WFC 0.27 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSBR, UWMC and WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) $17.08B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $507.98M, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $255.32B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has the highest net margin (UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.2%). On return on invested capital, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) leads (UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 15.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) returned the most: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -18.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.8%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) -1.4%. Over five years, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) compounded fastest (Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -5.6%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.3%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +10.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 0.00%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 0.02%. Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) and UWM Holdings (UWMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has been the steadiest (Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 38.3%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSBR, UWMC and WFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.