BSBR vs HSBC vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Banco Santander (Brasil), Hsbc Holdings and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HSBC Hsbc Holdings Plc
$86.62 -14.0% 1M +22.9% 1Y
Market cap
$297.54B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.16B
Div. yield
4.33%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
7 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.48 +18.4% 1M -73.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.37B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
20.27%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Hsbc Holdings leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Hsbc Holdings 7, Banco Santander (Brasil) 1, UWM Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSBRHSBCUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $34.14B $297.54B $2.37B HSBC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 11.4x -13.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.7x 9.6x 7.8x BSBR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +1,900.0% +26.1% HSBC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 47.9% -1.0% HSBC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 6.3% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 10.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 9.19% 4.33% 20.27% UWMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.2% +22.9% -73.8% HSBC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.6%/yr +23.6%/yr -26.3%/yr HSBC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.3% 28.0% 80.1% HSBC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 64/100 35/100 HSBC

Percentile Scorecard

BSBRHSBCUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSBRHSBCUWMC
Valuation – 11 #323 of 361 19 #138 of 169
Growth – 67 #51 of 153 16 #134 of 159
Profitability – 86 #19 of 128 31 #101 of 146
Financial Health 33 #94 of 140 – 17 #127 of 153
Shareholder Returns 99 #3 of 335 91 #32 of 335 94 #9 of 135
Overall – 64 35
  • BSBR ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • HSBC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSBRHSBCUWMCSPY
1 month -19.5%-14.0%+18.4% +0.7%
3 months -9.7%-19.1%-20.9% +3.7%
6 months -22.0%-5.7%-58.2% +7.1%
Year to date -25.2%+10.1%-66.2% +12.8%
1 year -18.2%+22.9%-73.8% +11.9%
3 years -13.1%+140.5%-69.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year -4.6%+34.0%-32.8% +22.8%
5 years -25.2%+188.1%-78.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year -5.6%+23.6%-26.3% +10.9%
10 years -42.2%+128.9%— +262.0%
10 years, per year -5.3%+8.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBSBRHSBCUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.3%28.0%80.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.3%28.1%89.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.211.251.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.480.82-0.92 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.2%-34.6%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.5%-19.7%-75.7% -1.2%
52-week high $7.20$107.85$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $4.55$67.56$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSBRHSBCUWMC
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.2x 11.4xmedian 12.2x -13.4xmedian 11.7x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.4x 5.4xmedian 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.3x —median 5.3x 15.1xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.8x —median 10.8x -0.5xmedian 6.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 1.5xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.34 3.05median 1.34 0.26median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSBRHSBCUWMC
Revenue – $55.16B $3.58B
Operating income – $33.06B –
Net income – $28.08B -$104.96M
Free cash flow – – -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) – $7.53 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $5.42B $222.46B $498.41M
Total debt $15.65B – $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 3.93B 3.51B 337.53M
Enterprise value -$313.53B -$1.81T $929.08M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSBRHSBCUWMC
P/E – 11.4x -13.4x
P/FCF – – -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow – – -0.5x
P/S – 5.4x 0.7x
P/B 1.4x 1.5x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 1.5x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA – – 15.1x
EV/EBIT – -16.3x 17.0x
EV/Revenue – -9.8x 2.2x
EV/FCF – – -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 3.05 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSBRHSBCUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 1,900% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -4.3% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 40.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 1.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 51.5% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – 68.0% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 3.7% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSBRHSBCUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 14.6%
Operating margin – 59.9% –
Pretax margin – 65.2% -3.2%
Net margin – 47.9% -1.0%
FCF margin – – -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin – – -135.9%
Return on equity – 14.3% -8.1%
Return on assets – 0.8% -0.6%
Return on invested capital – – 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSBRHSBCUWMC
Debt / assets 6.3% – 33.5%
Debt / equity 0.6x – 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 10.6x
Debt / FCF – – -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 90.1% 94.3% 94.5%
Equity / assets 9.9% 5.7% 5.5%
Interest coverage – – 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSBRHSBCUWMC
Dividend yield 9.2% 4.3% 20.3%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 9.2% 4.3% 20.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSBRHSBCUWMC
Forward P/E 6.7xFY2026 9.6xFY2026 7.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.68FY2026 $9.02FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.1%FY2026 +19.5%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.9% +9.1% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.93BFY2026 $70.05BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.4%FY2026 -1.3%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.6% +18.0% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSBRHSBCUWMC
Held by institutions 14.6% 2.5% 17.0%
Institutions holding 88 708 291
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% -0.3% +31.8%
Institutions buying 52 403 214
Institutions selling 24 180 50
Buyers to sellers 2.17 2.24 4.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSBRHSBCUWMC
BSBR 1.00 0.41 0.14
HSBC 0.41 1.00 0.07
UWMC 0.14 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSBR, HSBC and UWMC?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) $34.14B, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) $297.54B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.37B.

Which company is growing faster?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +1,900.0%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) has the highest net margin (Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 47.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) returned the most: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -18.2%, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +22.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.8%. Over five years, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) compounded fastest (Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -5.6%/yr, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) +23.6%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) has the highest dividend yield: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 9.19%, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 4.33%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 20.27%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) has been the steadiest (Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 38.3%, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) 28.0%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSBR, HSBC and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hsbc Holdings (HSBC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.