BSBR vs CFG vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Banco Santander (Brasil), Citizens Financial and UWM Holdings Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.58 +24.4% 1M -71.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.53B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
18.99%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Citizens Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Citizens Financial 6, UWM Holdings 3, Banco Santander (Brasil) 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSBRCFGUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $33.70B $27.35B $2.53B BSBR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 12.9x -14.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.6x 12.0x 8.3x BSBR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +10.6% +26.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 23.8% -1.0% CFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 12.0% 6.3% CFG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.6x 10.6x CFG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 9.31% 2.93% 18.99% UWMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.1% +27.6% -71.9% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -7.0%/yr +6.0%/yr -26.3%/yr CFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.5% 25.6% 80.5% CFG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 23/100 35/100 UWMC

Percentile Scorecard

BSBRCFGUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSBRCFGUWMC
Valuation – 20 #287 of 359 18 #139 of 169
Growth – 14 #294 of 340 17 #137 of 164
Profitability – 15 #292 of 343 28 #111 of 154
Financial Health 21 #269 of 338 19 #273 of 338 17 #135 of 163
Shareholder Returns 99 #3 of 351 48 #183 of 351 93 #10 of 137
Overall – 23 35
  • BSBR ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • CFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSBRCFGUWMCSPY
1 month -16.3%+0.9%+24.4% -2.3%
3 months -21.4%-10.7%-18.1% -0.7%
6 months -21.8%+2.2%-55.4% +4.8%
Year to date -26.2%+11.2%-63.9% +10.3%
1 year -22.1%+27.6%-71.9% +10.3%
3 years -19.9%+148.1%-70.8% +73.0%
3 years, per year -7.1%+35.4%-33.7% +20.1%
5 years -30.5%+34.0%-78.2% +61.9%
5 years, per year -7.0%+6.0%-26.3% +10.1%
10 years -42.7%+148.8%— +258.6%
10 years, per year -5.4%+9.5%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBSBRCFGUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.5%25.6%80.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.4%25.9%90.1% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.240.891.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.571.08-0.89 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.2%-59.4%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.4%-13.1%-74.1% -3.5%
52-week high $7.20$74.73$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $4.41$49.71$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSBRCFGUWMC
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.7x 12.9xmedian 12.7x -14.4xmedian 11.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.5x 3.1xmedian 3.5x 0.7xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 4.9x 6.5xmedian 4.9x 15.4xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.4x 25.0xmedian 11.4x -0.5xmedian 6.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.2x 2.6xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.46 2.01median 1.46 0.28median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSBRCFGUWMC
Revenue – $8.93B $3.58B
Net income – $2.27B -$104.96M
Free cash flow – $1.09B -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) – $4.99 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $5.42B – $498.41M
Total debt $15.65B $17.83B $6.02B
Shares (diluted) 3.93B 425.66M 337.53M
Enterprise value -$313.98B $27.35B $1.09B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSBRCFGUWMC
P/E – 12.9x -14.4x
P/FCF – 25.0x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 21.7x -0.5x
P/S – 3.1x 0.7x
P/B 1.4x 1.1x 2.6x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 1.1x -0.6x
EV/EBITDA – 6.5x 15.4x
EV/EBIT – 6.9x 17.4x
EV/Revenue – 5.1x 2.3x
EV/FCF – 41.3x -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 35.9x -1.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.01 0.28

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSBRCFGUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 10.6% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 1.9% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – 33.1% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 3.1% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – 38.9% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 6.4% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -55.9% -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -30.4% -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -59.8% -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -32.9% -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSBRCFGUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 77.7% 14.6%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 32.3% -3.2%
Net margin – 23.8% -1.0%
FCF margin – 12.2% -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 14.1% -135.9%
Return on equity – 8.8% -8.1%
Return on assets – 1.0% -0.6%
Return on invested capital – 12.0% 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.6x 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.5% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSBRCFGUWMC
Debt / assets 6.3% 7.6% 33.5%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.7x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.6x 10.6x
Debt / FCF – 16.3x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 90.1% 89.3% 94.5%
Equity / assets 9.9% 10.7% 5.5%
Interest coverage – 1.8x 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSBRCFGUWMC
Dividend yield 9.3% 2.9% 19.0%
Net buyback yield – 4.3% –
Shareholder yield 9.3% 7.2% 19.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 35.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 72.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSBRCFGUWMC
Forward P/E 6.6xFY2026 12.0xFY2026 8.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.68FY2026 $5.42FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.1%FY2026 +40.4%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +30.9% +27.1% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $16.93BFY2026 $8.59BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.4%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.6% +11.4% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSBRCFGUWMC
Held by institutions 14.6% 96.7% 17.0%
Institutions holding 88 1,099 291
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +2.9% +31.8%
Institutions buying 52 634 214
Institutions selling 24 315 50
Buyers to sellers 2.17 2.01 4.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSBRCFGUWMC
BSBR 1.00 0.34 0.12
CFG 0.34 1.00 0.22
UWMC 0.12 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSBR, CFG and UWMC?

Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) $33.70B, Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.35B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.53B.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Citizens Financial (CFG) +10.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Citizens Financial (CFG) has the highest net margin (Citizens Financial (CFG) 23.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads (Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -22.1%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +27.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -71.9%. Over five years, Citizens Financial (CFG) compounded fastest (Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) -7.0%/yr, Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.0%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) has the highest dividend yield: Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 9.31%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 2.93%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 18.99%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Citizens Financial (CFG) has been the steadiest (Banco Santander (Brasil) (BSBR) 38.5%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSBR, CFG and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Citizens Financial (CFG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.