BSAC vs TIGR vs FITB Stock Comparison

Banco Santander Chile, UP Fintech Holding and Fifth Third Bancorp Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MTB) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
BSAC Banco Santander Chile
$33.08 +1.2% 1M +16.6% 1Y
Market cap
$415.59B
P/E
0.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
4.47%
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Ltd
$3.95 -10.2% 1M -61.1% 1Y
Market cap
$698.26M
P/E
5.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$687.88M
Div. yield
–
Retail Brokerage Financial Services
3 wins
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp
$54.73 +7.7% 1M +29.8% 1Y
Market cap
$49.66B
P/E
20.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.72B
Div. yield
2.96%
Regional Banks Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Banco Santander Chile leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Banco Santander Chile 4, Fifth Third Bancorp 4, UP Fintech Holding 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBSACTIGRFITBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $415.59B $698.26M $49.66B BSAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 5.8x 20.6x BSAC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.6x 7.5x 17.4x TIGR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +41.4% +32.5% TIGR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 17.4% 20.6% FITB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 11.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x — -0.3x FITB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 4.47% 0.00% 2.96% BSAC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.6% -61.1% +29.8% FITB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.1%/yr -10.3%/yr +4.4%/yr BSAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.4% 57.8% 25.1% FITB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 69/100 29/100 TIGR

Percentile Scorecard

BSACTIGRFITB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBSACTIGRFITB
Valuation 10 #323 of 360 99 #2 of 103 14 #309 of 360
Growth 18 #281 of 344 77 #17 of 70 16 #291 of 344
Profitability – 58 #32 of 74 16 #290 of 345
Financial Health 9 #308 of 339 43 #57 of 99 37 #214 of 339
Shareholder Returns 94 #23 of 352 – 60 #141 of 352
Overall 33 69 29
  • BSAC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • TIGR ranked among 110 companies in Capital Markets
  • FITB ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBSACTIGRFITBSPY
1 month +1.2%-10.2%+7.7% -1.0%
3 months -6.2%-17.9%-4.9% -0.4%
6 months +4.9%-43.0%+7.7% +4.5%
Year to date +6.3%-58.7%+16.9% +12.4%
1 year +16.6%-61.1%+29.8% +13.6%
3 years +78.8%-17.5%+106.8% +76.4%
3 years, per year +21.4%-6.2%+27.4% +20.8%
5 years +77.0%-42.0%+24.2% +63.7%
5 years, per year +12.1%-10.3%+4.4% +10.4%
10 years +47.0%—+158.0% +267.7%
10 years, per year +3.9%—+9.9% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureBSACTIGRFITBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.4%57.8%25.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.8%63.6%24.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.131.640.71 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.56-1.061.19 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.5%-70.4%-54.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.7%-64.5%-7.8% -1.6%
52-week high $37.46$11.12$59.36 $779.14
52-week low $28.38$3.85$41.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBSACTIGRFITB
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 12.7x 5.8xmedian 29.7x 20.6xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 78.5xmedian 3.5x 1.0xmedian 3.0x 4.2xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 4.9x 0.9xmedian 13.6x 5.6xmedian 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -13,482xmedian 11.0x —median 15.1x 17.8xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 66.6xmedian 1.3x 0.8xmedian 2.4x 1.5xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 1.33 0.09median 0.55 -2.25median 1.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBSACTIGRFITB
Revenue – $687.88M $11.72B
Operating income $278.26B $163.65M –
Net income -$1.70T $112.10M $2.56B
Free cash flow – – $2.79B
EPS (diluted) $1,126.89 $0.64 $2.64
Cash & equivalents $2.20B $542.51M $4.09B
Total debt $47.85B – $18.14B
Shares (diluted) 471.12M 187.18M 917.10M
Enterprise value -$7.10T -$1.81B -$38.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBSACTIGRFITB
P/E 0.0x 5.8x 20.6x
P/FCF -13,482x – 17.8x
P/Operating cash flow – – 14.4x
P/S 78.5x 1.0x 4.2x
P/B 66.6x 0.8x 1.5x
P/Tangible book -4.9x 0.8x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 0.3x 0.9x 5.6x
EV/EBIT 1.6x 0.8x 6.2x
EV/Revenue – 0.2x 4.0x
EV/FCF – – 16.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 13.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 0.09 -2.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBSACTIGRFITB
Revenue growth (1Y) – 41.4% 32.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 39.8% 9.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -85.8% 136.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 44.6% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -229.4% -5.2% 6.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -114.2% 63.1% 0.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -18.5% -18.5% -21.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 48.4% 62.9% -9.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -0.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -8.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -4.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -11.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBSACTIGRFITB
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 24.9% 71.3%
Operating margin – 23.8% –
Pretax margin – 22.9% 27.8%
Net margin – 17.4% 20.6%
FCF margin – – 23.8%
Operating cash flow margin – – 29.5%
Return on equity – 13.0% 7.6%
Return on assets 2,022% 1.2% 0.9%
Return on invested capital – – 11.1%
Return on capital employed – 36.2% –
Asset turnover – 0.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 2.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBSACTIGRFITB
Debt / assets 63.2% – 6.0%
Debt / equity 7.7x – 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x – -0.3x
Debt / FCF – – 6.5x
Liabilities / assets 91.8% 90.9% 88.9%
Equity / assets 8.2% 9.1% 11.1%
Interest coverage – 2.3x 1.7x
Current ratio – 1.1x –
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.1x –
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – 0.32 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBSACTIGRFITB
Dividend yield 4.5% – 3.0%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 4.5% 0.0% 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBSACTIGRFITB
Forward P/E 11.6xFY2026 7.5xFY2026 17.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.84FY2026 $0.53FY2026 $3.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.7%FY2026 -47.5%FY2026 -10.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.5% +35.8% +61.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.07BFY2026 $591.32MFY2026 $12.18BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.8%FY2026 -3.4%FY2026 +34.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.1% +7.5% +23.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBSACTIGRFITB
Held by institutions 0.2% 2.2% 90.8%
Institutions holding 157 117 1,307
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.7% +6.6% +3.9%
Institutions buying 82 65 692
Institutions selling 51 36 409
Buyers to sellers 1.61 1.81 1.69

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BSACTIGRFITB
BSAC 1.00 0.36 0.32
TIGR 0.36 1.00 0.15
FITB 0.32 0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BSAC, TIGR and FITB?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) $415.59B, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) $698.26M, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) $49.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, BSAC, TIGR and FITB?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 0.0x, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 5.8x, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 20.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) is cheapest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 11.6x, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 7.5x, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 17.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) +41.4%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +32.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) has the highest net margin (UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 17.4%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 20.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) returned the most: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +16.6%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) -61.1%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +29.8%. Over five years, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) compounded fastest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) +12.1%/yr, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) -10.3%/yr, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) +4.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) has the highest dividend yield: Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 4.47%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 0.00%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 2.96%. UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) has been the steadiest (Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) 29.4%, UP Fintech Holding (TIGR) 57.8%, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) 25.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BSAC, TIGR and FITB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.